[JennyD]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

Again it just depends on the definition of consume, because everything is so technical within in this online community. If your definition of consumption is ingestion, then you just contradicted yourself.

No, I applied both the primary and secondary definitions of the word YOU chose. Consume. I've already posted the definition. I've also asked if I was supposed to be a mind reader and guess at which definition YOU intended, since you were unable to say what you intended.

If you are unable to outline a legal agreement (that is, your wager) concisely and accurately and in terms we or any reasonable person can understand, that is your problem and not ours. Will you cheat Jesus over your own incompetence and limited grasp of vocabulary?

Jesus hates those who cheat Him. Do you wish to spend eternity in Hell over your ridiculous and unfounded pride?

By the way, BlingThing, The Real World is technical. If you can't manage here, you won't be worth much out there. Time to grow up and learn from your mistakes instead of whining about others expecting you to say what you mean and mean what you say. Pathetic pansies don't make it in The Real World.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

Again it just depends on the definition of consume, because everything is so technical within in this online community. If your definition of consumption is ingestion, then you just contradicted yourself.

Are you sure you aren't a joo? Because you sure wriggle like one.

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

We've already established that, according to your secular "science", it is physically impossible for me to "consume", that is, use up, any volume of DHMO.

It is, as you know, impossible to avoid ingesting this substance, which the UN has released into the atmosphere, by which it has contaminated all water supplies throughout the world. DHMO is even found in Antarctic ice!

However, I never have, and never will, consume any DHMO.

Again it just depends on the definition of consume, because everything is so technical within in this online community. If your definition of consumption is ingestion, then you just contradicted yourself.

[JennyD]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

When I said "Root of All Evil" I meant Christianity. Without manipulating the core of the idea, JennyD had to go one week without consuming any DHMO, and because there is no proof I can only assume she did.

The benefits of DHMO outweigh the potential risks it has.

We've already established that, according to your secular "science", it is physically impossible for me to "consume", that is, use up, any volume of DHMO.

It is, as you know, impossible to avoid ingesting this substance, which the UN has released into the atmosphere, by which it has contaminated all water supplies throughout the world. DHMO is even found in Antarctic ice!

However, I never have, and never will, consume any DHMO.

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

My apologies LDD, and it’s not often you’ll find any cause for my saying that (but then as you know we here at Landover are nothing if not humble, upright, straightforward and honourable.) I see that the sum is $100,000, which is more of a man’s bet than the insignificant, girly sum of $10,000 I posted.

Well, I’m agreeing with you insomuch as that you and I both know that honouring a wager is the right thing to do. it would appear that you have defined the term of the wager and thus defined the term “consume” and thus what should happen to the DHMO. “Consume” does mean “to destroy” as in “to consume by fire” and you will be the first to admit that there was no destruction.Damn generous of you sir, I see the shiny button beckoning! what you are intending to quote is, 1Tm:6:10: For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. And thus, as you have said that the amount is irrelevant, I can assume that you have no “love of money”, thus it will be a Godly gift and you may donate without sinning.

Finally, can I take it that you now accept that DHMO is a major cause of death the world over?

When I said "Root of All Evil" I meant Christianity. Without manipulating the core of the idea, JennyD had to go one week without consuming any DHMO, and because there is no proof I can only assume she did.

The benefits of DHMO outweigh the potential risks it has.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

When it comes to Christian extremists you, Ahimaaz Smith, are my favorite, because you are the only one that seems to have the capability with challenging my statements with intelligent retorts.

I'm certainly no more extreme than the folks who wrote the Bible. There are plenty of Landoverites who are smarter and more knowledgeable than I am, but they probably don't want to bother arguing over trivialities like a $10,000 bet, whereas I have no shame and will discuss anything.

However I did not lose the bet, because I specifically stated that there would have to exist proof for me to know for sure that JennyD did not consume any DHMO.

I knew it. You just want to see Sister JennyD naked. Well, my friend, you and me both, but it ain't never gonna happen.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

My apologies LDD, and it’s not often you’ll find any cause for my saying that (but then as you know we here at Landover are nothing if not humble, upright, straightforward and honourable.)

If you go one week without consuming any DHMO, I'll donate $100,000 to the Landover Baptist Church.

I see that the sum is $100,000, which is more of a man’s bet than the insignificant, girly sum of $10,000 I posted.

I'm not sure if you're agreeing with me or not.

Well, I’m agreeing with you insomuch as that you and I both know that honouring a wager is the right thing to do.

Whether or not $10,000 is considered a lot of money - I don't want to offend anyone - I still need proof that JennyD did not consume DHMO.

it would appear that you have defined the term of the wager and thus defined the term “consume” and thus what should happen to the DHMO. “Consume” does mean “to destroy” as in “to consume by fire” and you will be the first to admit that there was no destruction.

And plus it wouldn't matter if it was $10,000,000 or $0.

Damn generous of you sir, I see the shiny button beckoning!

it's the fact that it helps the ROOT OF ALL EVIL

what you are intending to quote is, 1Tm:6:10: For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. And thus, as you have said that the amount is irrelevant, I can assume that you have no “love of money”, thus it will be a Godly gift and you may donate without sinning.

Finally, can I take it that you now accept that DHMO is a major cause of death the world over?

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

Prove a negative? Oh, come on LDD, what's $10,000? It's less than the depreciation on a decent vehicle in a year. It's not as if it is BIG money, is it?

Press the shiny button and we'll say no more about it.

I'm not sure if you're agreeing with me or not. Whether or not $10,000 is considered a lot of money - I don't want to offened anyone - I still need proof that JennyD did not consume DHMO. And plus it wouldn't matter if it was $10,000,000 or $0.10 it's the fact that it helps the ROOT OF ALL EVIL.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

When it comes to Christian extremists you, Ahimaaz Smith, are my favorite, because you are the only one that seems to have the capability with challenging my statements with intelligent retorts. However I did not lose the bet, because I specifically stated that there would have to exist proof for me to know for sure that JennyD did not consume any DHMO. Because providing proof would cost well over the $10,000 I promised, it would be in your best interest not go through with this bet. But if you were to I would need to see an entire week's footage of JennyD not consuming any DHMO.

Prove a negative? Oh, come on LDD, what's $10,000? It's less than the depreciation on a decent vehicle in a year. It's not as if it is BIG money, is it?

Press the shiny button and we'll say no more about it.

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

Dude, you said if she does not consume any DHMO. As it happens, I have a bottle of the very stuff in my refrigerator, and Sister Jenny went nowhere near it (nor, for that matter, did anyone else). Since you gave us the choice of which particular DHMO Sister Jenny was not to consume by using the word "any," we chose that bottle.

So, even if you are right about the "consumption" part (and I'm not saying that you are), you still lose the bet.

When it comes to Christian extremists you, Ahimaaz Smith, are my favorite, because you are the only one that seems to have the capability with challenging my statements with intelligent retorts. However I did not lose the bet, because I specifically stated that there would have to exist proof for me to know for sure that JennyD did not consume any DHMO. Because providing proof would cost well over the $10,000 I promised, it would be in your best interest not go through with this bet. But if you were to I would need to see an entire week's footage of JennyD not consuming any DHMO.

[Dr. Ernest C. Ville, D.C.S.]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

This issue, to me, shows the direct bias in secular science today. Scientists can go yammering on and on for hours on the imagined effects of things like "evolution" and "global warming", but when good scientific facts like these are presented, they do nothing but laugh. It's saddening, but a true sign that we are in the End Times(r), for real this time.

[SUV]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

I think the real issue we should be getting at here is what the HELL happened to snottyduck's avatar, and what the HELL is this?

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

My definition of consumption exists in the dictionary that you provided. My definition is not obsolete among soceity. I don't see where I lied.

Dude, you said if she does not consume any DHMO. As it happens, I have a bottle of the very stuff in my refrigerator, and Sister Jenny went nowhere near it (nor, for that matter, did anyone else). Since you gave us the choice of which particular DHMO Sister Jenny was not to consume by using the word "any," we chose that bottle.

So, even if you are right about the "consumption" part (and I'm not saying that you are), you still lose the bet.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

I see they also deleted the part where I mentioned that site was a hoax, which I realized almost immediately.

And to think you actually had the gaul to challenge me to debates in the past. Why have you returned, witch? Has your desire to indulge in the holy contents of my most holy of pants been to great for you to ignore? It is never going to happen, witch? I am a happily married man!!!

[JennyD]

Re: Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide!

My definition of consumption exists in the dictionary that you provided. My definition is not obsolete among soceity. I don't see where I lied.

But, hypothetically, let's speak as though I did lie. I have no question that you fully comprehended my promise the first time you set your eyes on. However, you manipulated the situation for your favor and gain. I believe that your God would not be pleased for such immoral deceptioin.

You, little boy, are a liar and an imbecile.

Your mother must be proud.