[Didymus Much]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Like I said, you're retarded, learn what it mean in the context of science...

1) When are you going to realize that ad hominem attacks only make your argument look weaker?

2) For your attempted insults to mean anything to me, I'd have to respect your opinion. As you've relied on little but ad hominems, bad logic, misunderstanding of basic scientific and epistemology terms, ignorance of the scientific method, and a complete lack of understanding of the religious mind, why would I?

3) The word means the same in any context (or else it would have a separate definition listed, and it doesn't).

...I knew you would say '' BUT ONLY BAPTIST TRUE CHRISTIAN PRAYERS WORKS!!!!111''...

No, I didn't. I said that the Bible says that prayers of Catholics are worthless.

And go look up "Strawman Fallacy", because that's what you just did (fallacious arguments just make your case look even weaker).

...But stangely, religiontards mind, including yours...

Another ad hominem? *yawn*

How many times to I have to tell you that I'm atheist?

...Meanwhile, no amount of prayers you'll ever do will make that sky wizard slap my face right now...

Because that would be PROOF of His existence, and He doesn't do that. He wants your faith, which is incompatible with proof. If you have one, you have no need of the other.

...no prayers will repeat the miracles that jesus did ( healing the blind with a hand wave )...

He never did that (not even in the Bible). Keep showing your ignorance.

...Give me one scientific evidence that God exists and I will believe.

No, you wouldn't. You'd KNOW, not believe.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Every time a pope falls ill and dies Satan and his minions get ready for one more anus to scrape, grab, plunge into, and otherwise slop their demonic spooge into for eternity!

Praise Jesus!

[Kewlcat]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Of COURSE secular scientists change their ideas as time goes by, they just keep trying to get closer and closer to the truth, because everyone knows how far they are from it

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Originally Posted by Steph Leia
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-physicist-slower-thought.html_

Secular scientists just can't stick to one idea, can they?

There was Einstein pronouncing that the speed of light is constant relative to the observer and then these physicists start treating it as an absolute value.

Even the arch-polemecist acknowledging differences between an obsessive compulsion and Historical Records preserved for us by God in The Bible finds the latter to be of greater interest.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNGwVTxn7TA&t=500

In one of the linked articles:

http://phys.org/news/2014-05-does-light-experience-time.html#inlRlv_
Just think about that idea. From the perspective of a photon, there is no such thing as time. It's emitted, and might exist for hundreds of trillions of years, but for the photon, there's zero time elapsed between when it's emitted and when it's absorbed again. It doesn't experience distance either.

Prevaricating, the physicist when questioned might say "..er ..do you mean what would it be like if you were sitting on the photon?" but of course that would not be what I meant I'd have been asking what would it be like if I actually was the photon and they'd dodge around going "if you were the photon ..when, exactly?" and I'd reply when you thought I was sitting on it.

No wonder Hitchens found religion more interesting. Even a tapeworm would!

[Jim Farmer]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Here's another one - sickular scientists changing their mind:

Black holes do not exist

Black holes — the most dense objects in the universe that do not even let light escape — do not exist, a physics professor in the US has claimed. Laura Mersini-Houghton at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the College of Arts and Sciences, has proven, mathematically, that black holes can never come into being in the first place.

from here.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Secular scientists changing minds...again...

Here's another one - sickular scientists changing their mind:

Black holes do not exist

from _http://www.firstpost.com/living/black-holes-are-mathematically-impossible-says-a-new-study-1735633.html

They are certainly a confused lot.

here we go with the first trough of pigswill:

For decades, black holes were thought to form when a massive star collapses under its own gravity to a single point in space - imagine the Earth being squished into a ball the size of a peanut - called a singularity, researchers said.

According to their own lexicon a "single point in space" (having I must suppose the mass of what they claim stars weigh) is in no way equivalent to the weight of the earth, as they present it, whether reduced to the size of a peanut or not. Addidionally, a peanut is nothing like either "a point in space" or "a singularity" grunt slobber

An invisible membrane known as the event horizon..

An "event horizon" is not a membrane..

surrounds the singularity and crossing this horizon means that you could never cross back. It's the point where a black hole's gravitational pull is so strong that nothing can escape it, they said.

..and even if it were a membrane is not a point. In order for something to be a membrane, regardless of shape, it needs to have area. To be a certain size. To have dimensions such as length and width or perhaps in non-Euclidean settings other characteristics enabling its area to be calculated. From early antiquity it has been recognised that points do not have ANY dimensions.

If a point sprouted a dimension it would become a line. If it sprouted two, it might become an infinite plane or perhaps curl up into a hollow sphere. Three dimensions are required for solid spheres and four for it to roll downhill. Like a pea into the pig's trough wallow snort

Thank you Mr Farmer for this update.