X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Iiwategtnac View Post
    Like I said a page back, normal people don't read bibles that promote violence towards one's wife nor does it promote racism.
    A small education upon the Godly Chastisement of womenfolk:

    We see in the Book of Jeremiah this:

    Jer:31:18: I have surely heard Ephraim bemoaning himself thus; Thou hast chastised me, and I was chastised, as a bullock unaccustomed to the yoke: turn thou me, and I shall be turned; for thou art the LORD my God.
    Jer:31:19: Surely after that I was turned, I repented; and after that I was instructed, I smote upon my thigh: I was ashamed, yea, even confounded, because I did bear the reproach of my youth.
    Jer:31:20: Is Ephraim my dear son? is he a pleasant child? for since I spake against him, I do earnestly remember him still: therefore my bowels are troubled for him; I will surely have mercy upon him, saith the LORD.

    And in 1 Corinthians unto us is revealed this wisdom:

    1Co:11:3: But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

    And having accepted, without question, the Word of God, we thus see that

    (i)God is to man as Man is to woman.

    (ii) God chastises man and therefore

    (iii)it is a man’s duty to chastise a woman such that she follow a Godly path of obedience to her master, who is man.

    Let us have no more dissent! The Lord has spoken! Can I have an AMEN!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ebenezer Wright
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Nobar King View Post
    What college do you go to where they have courses in ignorance?
    Yes Brother King he has his B.S. degree in ignorance. And I am not talking about bachelor of science degree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nobar King
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    That sir is a textbook example of ignorance.
    What college do you go to where they have courses in ignorance?

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaner
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    What I said about knowing more about the book more than you was a simple analogy showing you how little you actually know.
    I know your scriptures better than you... sad
    That is not a simple analogy, that is a direct statement with a little snippet on the end attempting to demean and belittle.

    I am willing to admit I cant quote directly from the book nor will I take anytime to do so because you guys already know every word you wrote into it.
    ...and if it was an attempt to show me how little I know about the Bible, why did you just admit that we know more than you?

    I dont see anyone asking earlier about sources. Ask me to source something and I will find the source I got it from. I know you guys are trying to make me sound ignorant but reread the lower 1st and all 2nd page. Where was your guns then?
    Why re-read it? Facts are not what you spew out of your mouth, you have to prove them. You have done nothing of the sort. We've proven you're deceitful and will say almost anything to win your argument. Why should we listen to anything you have to say?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gregg the Troll
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    That sir is a textbook example of ignorance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    I know you guys are trying to make me sound ignorant but reread the lower 1st and all 2nd page. Where was your guns then?
    We don't have to, freind. You're doing a fine job of that on your own.

    By the way; Jesus always wins.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gregg the Troll
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    What I said about knowing more about the book more than you was a simple analogy showing you how little you actually know. I am willing to admit I cant quote directly from the book nor will I take anytime to do so because you guys already know every word you wrote into it. I dont see anyone asking earlier about sources. Ask me to source something and I will find the source I got it from. I know you guys are trying to make me sound ignorant but reread the lower 1st and all 2nd page. Where was your guns then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaner
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Iiwategtnac View Post
    Well I prefer to not read fiction novels, so I haven't read the KJV.

    That's why I was wondering if it talked about people beating their wives or its just something you enjoy doing?
    Idiot. Enjoy Quarantine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaner
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    I am sticking to my guns but yet I still keep getting mixed messages from you. Its like you think your winning the debate.
    Sticking to what guns??? That you claim to know scripture but here we are twenty minutes later and you've done nothing but give excuses? A chimp could see I'm winning the debate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iiwategtnac
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Deaner View Post
    You have no idea what you're talking about either do you? This has already been asked but because of your density problem I'll say it again. Where did I say the KJV directly speaks of beating women? You just like to slander people. I have you both cornered like the rats you are.
    Well I prefer to not read fiction novels, so I haven't read the KJV.

    That's why I was wondering if it talked about people beating their wives or its just something you enjoy doing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaner
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    I am not going to quote from a book I do not agree with. That would be promoting your message of hate. Im having a hard time understanding how you make it seem like its ok to do wrong. Why do you question my knowledge while im questioning yours. I dont remember you guys speaking up when I shot you down with facts.
    First of all, you're still being evasive. Why would you not repeat what you have claimed you know everything about? You're being an idiot and I see right through you. You're not only a liar, you're a coward.

    Second, what facts? You've done nothing but shoot your mouth off. I haven't seen one link, quote etc. to back up anything you said. You're just spewing stuff out your ass just like telling me how much you know about scripture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    I am sticking to my guns but yet I still keep getting mixed messages from you. Its like you think your winning the debate.
    This is NOT a debate forum, Mr. troll. Take a look at THIS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gregg the Troll
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    I am sticking to my guns but yet I still keep getting mixed messages from you. Its like you think your winning the debate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Gregg the Troll View Post
    I am not going to quote from a book I do not agree with. That would be promoting your message of hate. Im having a hard time understanding how you make it seem like its ok to do wrong. Why do you question my knowledge while im questioning yours. I dont remember you guys speaking up when I shot you down with facts.
    So then you admit that you're just talking out of your ass. We follow Jesus Christ, Savior of all Mankind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaner
    replied
    Re: I'm pink therefore I am spam

    Originally posted by Iiwategtnac View Post
    Satan who's that?

    He is dense, I was wondering if KJV talked about what do with women and if promoted beating them. If it didn't and thats his own choice then hes a sick person.

    Then he makes a comment about the bible not talking about man on man sex or smoking crack and if it makes that right? Well if the bible doesn't talk about wife beating does that make it right? No it doesn't..
    You have no idea what you're talking about either do you? This has already been asked but because of your density problem I'll say it again. Where did I say the KJV directly speaks of beating women? You just like to slander people. I have you both cornered like the rats you are.

    Leave a comment:

Working...