X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole View Post
    I swear every picture I see of them, she is ignoring him. Either he is as dimwitted as he appears or I think he is the racist.
    Is that a typo for she, Brother Dr Toole, Sir? Many people are racist against gingers but indicate this politely, in an acceptable way, by simply ignoring them.

    Originally posted by Dennis Lukes View Post
    As a registered Republican and dues-paying member of the NRA, I am torn between the necessity for an absolutely unregulated firearms industry and the desire to keep weapons out of the hands of foreign nationals...
    Is she Canadian then, Brother Lukes? Because she is not a British citizen. The Brits are not fussy, and all you need to do is live there for five years - ideally without libeling the monarch's immediate family . But it seems unlikely that she will ever fulfill even the first requirement, having never managed more than a couple of months at a time without jetting off on another exhausting holiday.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Anthony J. Toole
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    I swear every picture I see of them, she is ignoring him. Either he is as dimwitted as he appears or I think he is the racist.




    Talking of mystery dimwitted racists, really my money's on....


    Leave a comment:


  • Dennis Lukes
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:

    As a registered Republican and dues-paying member of the NRA, I am torn between the necessity for an absolutely unregulated firearms industry and the desire to keep weapons out of the hands of foreign nationals, gang members, and people of certain colors (all of which describe the mulatress in question). The Second Amendment is all about "the security of a free State," and I don't see how that end can be served by allowing a liberal colored woman (three strikes), who has renounced her citizenship in order to join a foreign organization with confirmed ties to the Third Reich, to own a gun. How is our safety assured by enabling those at whom we would point our guns, so as to secure our free State, point their own guns back at us? One of us might get shot! This is why I have long lobbied to have the secular 2nd Amendment repealed and replaced with the relevant scripture, Luke 22:36. Instead of allowing all citizens to own guns, the new amendment would make gun ownership mandatory for the followers of Christ and ban it for His enemies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Isabella White
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:
    Oh, yes, dear Brother Mayor Hold, and what better fashion accessory to have, than a coordinating gun. Why, with Easter just around the corner, one can think of several situations in which this would be so ever so suitable.






    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:

    Leave a comment:


  • Isabella White
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    Meghan and Harry just finished their $5 million interview with Oprah. Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse.
    Oh, this is such a sensible idea, dear Brother Mayor Hold -- one that must be lost on Meghan & Harry (or, as I think of them: Nutmeg & Ginger). Goodness knows that they have lived in the blessed long enough to know that they can walk into any gun store, and buy whatever they need.

    I'm wondering if I should put a call in to that lovely Lauren Boebert, to see if she would be interested in coaching Nutmeg in how to use a gun properly. If anybody knows her way around a firearm, it's dear Lauren!



    And, it's very important that the unhappy couple receive their marksmanship training from qualified individuals, and not from some dozy, old, sleepy Joe Burden type:

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse. Anyone who threatened them, bang, problem solved. There are such simple solutions right there at the gun store.
    Well exactly, Brother Mayor Hold, Sir! Former-Prince Harold is ex-military and served in Afghanistan, though whether he was allowed access to weaponry while being sheltered from harm by his soldiers is unclear. Maybe they let him have a gun but no bullets? But surely Mizz Marple must have learned how to handle a gun - if only Chekhov's - during her degree in Theater Studies?

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Meghan and Harry just finished their $5 million interview with Oprah.

    Here is what I can't understand. They said they were stunned when the Royals pulled their security. Harry assumed he was entitled to security by birth. They had to scurry around and figure out some other arrangement for security in California.

    Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse. Anyone who threatened them, bang, problem solved. There are such simple solutions right there at the gun store.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Isabella White View Post
    "Prince Harry bares his bunions: Duke may be suffering 'mild deformity' due to years of high impact training in the Army, podiatrist claims"
    Who knew that petulantly stamping your feet caused bunions? But is it not more likely that he caught them from his wife?Click image for larger version

Name:	meghanfeet.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	27.8 KB
ID:	1924971

    Leave a comment:


  • Isabella White
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    Oh, don't trouble yourself about Lilibet, Brother Hutchins. She's a tough old bird and she's used to it. Just look at her perfectly ghastly children - not to mention her prime ministers.
    Oh, good heavens, yes, dear Sister Joanna; yes, this is so very true. Even Princess Anne's father once compared her to the horses -- or something like that -- Her Royal Hayness, one supposes. And, now we're supposed to feel sorry for Her Majesty's ghastly grandchildren, as well? The papers today are full of stories about Prince Harry's bunions!

    "Prince Harry bares his bunions: Duke may be suffering 'mild deformity' due to years of high impact training in the Army, podiatrist claims"

    Last night the Duke of Sussex's bare feet sparked calls for the royal to 'buy some shoes and put them away' after he bared his soles in a photo announcing baby number two with wife Meghan.


    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Anthony J. Toole
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    I read that:

    I did not realize that they had been silent. They did it very inconspicuously.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    Oh, don't trouble yourself about Lilibet, Brother Hutchins. She's a tough old bird and she's used to it. Just look at her perfectly ghastly children - not to mention her prime ministers.

    I blame her father, who (a) married a lush and (b) allowed his daughter to marry a Greek.
    I thank God all my sons are just like me. Decent and morally superior as the Bibles says.

    If secular law had not stuck its' smelly nose where it does not belong, that Marbles girl would of lived by Christian values and her father would of been able to ensure a decent upbringing.


    As far as the entire brit population, well they are brits and fortunately for them, they are not irish, though honestly, they all seem the same to me. They all speak oddly and not one speaks proper English. All anyone has to do is read the KJV Holy Bible and all would be crystal clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by James Hutchins View Post
    While woman's issues do not concern me, I do have a sensation of empathy for the Queen. Imagine the shame she has to endure!
    Oh, don't trouble yourself about Lilibet, Brother Hutchins. She's a tough old bird and she's used to it. Just look at her perfectly ghastly children - not to mention her prime ministers.

    I blame her father, who (a) married a lush and (b) allowed his daughter to marry a Greek.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    Everyone knew that the first one was an anchor baby to help with her application for British citizenship (though only Satan knows why she would want it). This one is presumably intended to secure ex-prince-Ginger's status in the United States - or at least in California, which is very much not the same thing.

    Watch out for #3 - idiots used to claim that every third child born in the world was Chinese.
    Not being one to gossip, I heard this baby will have a soul but it is another mixed race creature. While woman's issues do not concern me, I do have a sensation of empathy for the Queen. Imagine the shame she has to endure!


    God makes examples of us all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    Now we learn she is pregnant again. Are they going to stay here and pollute our white country with endless race indeterminate children? I thought one child was too many. Now there is another.
    Everyone knew that the first one was an anchor baby to help with her application for British citizenship (though only Satan knows why she would want it). This one is presumably intended to secure ex-prince-Ginger's status in the United States - or at least in California, which is very much not the same thing.

    Watch out for #3 - idiots used to claim that every third child born in the world was Chinese.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X