X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Isabella White
    replied
    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    I'm thinking there is real progress in leftist England. Harry is returning from California, but without Megan. Why would this be happening?

    I always say, connect the dots. There is a new King, King Charles. He has a white wife. I think King Charles has banned interracial marriage and Harry and Megan cannot be present together.

    Prince Harry won't reunite with King Charles during UK visit (msn.com)
    Well, apparently, confidential sources from the Palace say that Me-Again is afraid to set foot in London, in case she gets booed again!

    Meghan Markle may not want to accompany Prince Harry to Invictus Games event in London because she is afraid of being booed by UK crowds, royal expert tells PALACE CONFIDENTIAL

    The mother-of-two is worried about coming back because she does not want to feel unwelcome by royalists at St Paul's for the second time, according to Richard Eden.

    Meghan and Harry went to the historic landmark in 2022 to participate in celebrations for the late Queen's Platinum Jubilee.

    But when they exited the car, they were greeted by some smiles, cheers and applause - but also booing.

    Speaking on Palace Confidential, the Daily Mail's Richard Eden said: 'She does not want to return to Britain in a hurry. There are many people here who won't be sad about that.

    'Meghan will be wary of getting booed at St. Pauls'.
    Prince Harry, 39, is set to fly to the UK next week for the event but he will not be joined by Meghan Markle. Instead the Duchess of Sussex, 42, will fly from the US to Nigeria to meet her husband afterwards.


    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    I'm thinking there is real progress in leftist England. Harry is returning from California, but without Megan. Why would this be happening?

    I always say, connect the dots. There is a new King, King Charles. He has a white wife. I think King Charles has banned interracial marriage and Harry and Megan cannot be present together.

    Prince Harry won't reunite with King Charles during UK visit (msn.com)

    Leave a comment:


  • Dennis Lukes
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    I don't know why this couple keeps trying to pretend their interracial marriage is acceptable to God. We know, and surely they know, it is not. They should go on a world tour begging for forgiveness instead of doing media work portraying themselves as victims.
    The Bible tells us that Negroes have special requirements for their salvation, namely servility. The products of interracial spawning will become gradually more white over time as the recessive white genes flood out the one darkie ancestor. Meghan Markle looks like a quadroon, making Archie and Lillibet octoroons. Meghan looks more Mediterranean than Congoid, and her children could pass a purebred whites. This is a problem. If they were unaware of their ancestry, they would have no way of knowing that God expects them to serve white people and salvation would be cut off to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    I don't know why this couple keeps trying to pretend their interracial marriage is acceptable to God. We know, and surely they know, it is not. They should go on a world tour begging for forgiveness instead of doing media work portraying themselves as victims.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dennis Lukes
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Jeremy Clarkson should be Prime Minister of the UK, instead of that wog.

    Leave a comment:


  • handmaiden
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Some British TV personality recently made a rather colorful comment about Meghan Markle.

    “At night, I’m unable to sleep as I lie there, grinding my teeth and dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of Britain while the crowds chant ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her."

    What this man did wrong was to reference some childish nonsense from a British "Dungeons and Dragons" fantasy show. This makes him look small and silly. If one wishes to express contempt for another person, or if one is actively seeking to punish a wrong-doer, one needs to reference the Bible, not George R.R. Martin.

    The Bible commands that stones--not excrement--be thrown at a certain sort of woman to punish her for her sin. Furthermore, shouting "Shame!" is a puny substitute for the death penalty, which God's Righteous Word commands a lot.

    Another problem with this Jeremy Clarkson's comments is that it reveals that he is vividly thinking about another man's wife in her naked state. There is a Biblical commandment that expressly condemns this sort of thing.

    Finally, it is sad that anyone would lose sleep over such a minor matter. A high-minded person secure in their relationship with The Lord would say their prayers and rest easy upon their bed.

    I, for one, can go days without thinking of Meghan Markle (naked or clothed) and unless I have accidentally channel-surfed upon a nature documentary about chimpanzees, feces-flinging never occupies my thoughts in the least.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Anthony J. Toole
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Quietly staying in the news again, the Sussexes have dicreetly met with the Queen and Prince of England at Windsor Castle, as one does.

    Harry and Meghan ‘offer olive branch’ to Queen in low-key reunion

    [A] busload of tourists... saw the Sussexes looking “relaxed” and happily waving back to castle visitors.

    They reportedly flew to the Netherlands after the visit, where they are due to appear at the Invictus Games, accompanied by a Netflix crew for a documentary, Heart of Invictus, as part of the couple’s $100m (£76.5m) deal with the streaming company.

    For their part, the Queen, Charles, and William will be mindful that Harry’s much-publicised memoirs are due to be published this autumn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by James Hutchins View Post
    For the life of me, I do not understand why there is a continued harassment (there, I said what we were all thinking) of Prince Andrew. I've met him multiple times while on vacation in the Caribbean. Not once did he make any sort of sexual advances towards me.
    No, he often was seen quietly going from his bungalow to the spa with the assistance of his young aide. At meal time, he was seen feeding the less fortunate, youngsters who looked like they had not eaten solid food in weeks.
    These people accusing him of wrong doing, I have never seen them in my life and I've said so in several depositions.
    It's really helpful to have your first-hand experience on this, Brother James. Prince Andrew has a right to a balanced view on his life and times. Really, whatever he does after working hours is no one's business but his.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    For the life of me, I do not understand why there is a continued harassment (there, I said what we were all thinking) of Prince Andrew. I've met him multiple times while on vacation in the Caribbean. Not once did he make any sort of sexual advances towards me.
    No, he often was seen quietly going from his bungalow to the spa with the assistance of his young aide. At meal time, he was seen feeding the less fortunate, youngsters who looked like they had not eaten solid food in weeks.
    These people accusing him of wrong doing, I have never seen them in my life and I've said so in several depositions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole View Post
    Apparently what she is doing is called a "curtsy". I thought she was swatting away the bird that landed on her head and passing gas. Well, here's how it's supposed to look (note the bag of sand on the head rather than a bird):
    Bird on a nest or a bag of sand, both women look rather uncomfortable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Anthony J. Toole
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Apparently what she is doing is called a "curtsy". I thought she was swatting away the bird that landed on her head and passing gas. Well, here's how it's supposed to look (note the bag of sand on the head rather than a bird):
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by handmaiden View Post
    Sarah Ferguson is blatantly many things. The words, "demur" "discreet" and "subdued" do not appear to be in her personal lexicon.
    That woman might also be color blind - purple shoes with yellow dress and blue-green hat/purse?!

    Leave a comment:


  • handmaiden
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    Interesting that she seems to be channeling her leprechaun heritage there, with that curious hat.


    [
    White, perhaps, but also blatantly a ginger.
    Sarah Ferguson is blatantly many things. The words, "demur" "discreet" and "subdued" do not appear to be in her personal lexicon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Interesting that she seems to be channeling her leprechaun heritage there, with that curious hat.


    [
    Originally posted by Isabella White View Post
    ]So, again, you are quite right, dear Sister — but I do think that Sarah still gets top marks for being white, like !
    White, perhaps, but also blatantly a ginger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Isabella White
    replied
    Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

    Originally posted by handmaiden View Post
    My dearest Sister in Christ, you know that I am loathe to contradict any member of our community, particularly one so esteemed as yourself. However much it pains me to do so, I feel the need to point out that, while Prince Andrew's former wife is, indeed, VERY white, (as evidenced by the extreme skin damage she has incurred despite a life lived under the perpetually cloudy skies of her native land) the question of how "fine" she may be is still available for debate. On the one hand, she has been very supportive of her ex-husband in general and seems to understand--like the Biblical Sarah and Leah--that an extra concubine or two is nothing to make a fuss over.

    On the other hand, she did engage in adultery and by both Biblical and British historical standards she should have been put to death. Still, Jesus, Himself, was willing to spare an adulteress that particular fate, provided she refrain from any future sin. Thus we can conclude that Andrew was satisfied with her penance and didn't feel the need to trouble his mother with plans for an execution.

    Of course, as you have so astutely pointed out, these matters are completely separate from the much more serious issue of marrying outside of one's race.
    Oh, dearie me! I do thank you, dear Sister Handmaiden, for pointing out those incidental issues with Prince Andrew's wife. Goodness, gracious; it's been so long since those things had happened, and I'd forgotten about them. But, you are quite right to bring them up again.

    I John 1:9 "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."

    I remember seeing photos of Sarah curtseying, and I may have assumed that she was asking for pardon at the same time. But, after studying the photographs again, I'm not sure if she was sincere with her motives.

    As you shall see, the following photo looks more like a "Hello, how do you do on this very fine, cheery day?" type of greeting. One would be hard-pressed to see this as a cry for mercy.


    And, this next photo looks more like a sporting event for dressy ladies; or, possibly a dance number instead of an acknowledgment of serious sin?


    Now, of course, if Sarah is being insincere, then we can see how her silliness extends even to some of the menfolk!


    So, again, you are quite right, dear Sister — but I do think that Sarah still gets top marks for being white, like !


    Leave a comment:

Working...
X