[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I can't answer the first half of your question, Brother, but I do know the answer to this:

What are they going to do if some fierce winter is thrust upon them by God and they run out of food, are they going to grill Archie?

In our dreams, perhaps. But no, they will just send out their protection officers to pick up coffee and donuts.

As to sneaking across the border, it seems that they are already being warned off moving to Las Angelos. The justification for this is unclear - the self-styled "news anchor" quoted in that article doesn't make the most coherent argument. But at least if they move to LA, that's not really like moving to the USA, is it? I mean, it will soon be part of Mexico.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I was talking with some men in the Church last Sunday, nothing in particular other than thanking God for not killing us yet. When one of th guys wonder, is this soul-less red headed bastard of a child going to covert to eskimonian like his half breed 'wife'? What are they going to do if some fierce winter is thrust upon them by God and the run out of food, are they going to grill Archie? Also, why did the brits put him in Canada, where he could possibly cross the border like a messican right into the USA to get free benefits, would it not of been safer to of placed him in Austria like they did with all the other criminals?
I know, I know, this is like female gossip and if I were a woman, I should be 'shusshed and put in my place'.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

This reminds me of another British royal who married an American divorcee, forsook his birthright, and wound up in exile in the Americas.

And ultimately in Godless France - or was France part of the Americas back then? I don't know when/where it all started go wrong for the French, but allowing the wizened old Nazi and her husband to live there can't have helped.

There is some suspicion here that this may all be a ruse, with Meggxit designed to keep Breggxit off the front pages of the tabloids. If so, Britain could have expected to see this unappealing couple return quite soon. However, there seems to have been some miscalculation in their plan.

Everyone who matters is on tenterhooks (British upper-class code for really doesn't care) to learn whether the former HRH Harry will comply with Canada's fairly stringent immigration rules, what with him having no education and no discernible skills other than waving from cars and asking "And what do you do?". Perhaps he will be admitted as a dependent of his wife, who is able to teeter around in ill-fitting shoes and read a script. Oh well, whatever, never mind.

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Now the "lovely couple" is headed to North America under the cover of darkness. They will be here but no longer use their royal titles. This seems like they want to engage in secretive business with sinister ends.

To me, this is exactly what Satan does. He is secretive and deceptive. I'm anticipating the worst from this Meghan and Harry business.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/mega...192104894.html

This reminds me of another British royal who married an American divorcee, forsook his birthright, and wound up in exile in the Americas. That man was Harry's great great uncle Edward VIII.


See the family resemblance?




Clearly the rod was spared in this family (Proverbs 13:24). Charles would do well to crack open his dust-covered bible to Deuteronomy 21:18-21.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Now the "lovely couple" is headed to North America under the cover of darkness. They will be here but no longer use their royal titles. This seems like they want to engage in secretive business with sinister ends.

To me, this is exactly what Satan does. He is secretive and deceptive. I'm anticipating the worst from this Meghan and Harry business.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/megan-markle-prince-harry-lose-their-hrh-titles-as-they-are-no-longer-working-members-of-the-royal-family-192104894.html

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Just an update: although the ginger prince is to "step down" from his important duties as a senior royal, today he has bravely kept an appointment to meet some small rugby-playing catlick schoolchildren and host the draw for some tournament. (Rugby is a bit like True American™ football but played by girls.)

This important and senior royal work has involved shaking hands with some of the children and engaging them in conversation as follows:

"What do you do?" "I go to school."
"And what do you do?" "I go to school."
"And what do you do?" "I go to school."
"And what do you do?" "I go to school too. But what do you do?"

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I've been doing some detective work on this. I want to know why they are escaping England for North America. My suspicion is there is some kind of sin they want to engage in and cannot do it their under the watchful eye of the Queen.

The Queen, although a mere woman, is an experienced old broad and knows a bad'un when she sees one.



I guess they've chosen Canada to evade US taxes on the $$$$millions he gets from his dad? But once HM the Q carks it (as people in the British Isles and the Anti-Podes so charmingly put it), that money will dry up.

I wonder what will happen in a couple of years, when the "Duchess" has spent all their money on tasteless garments of mixed fabric and ill-fitting shoes. Will she live with her father after the divorce? Will Harry be allowed back into the UK, if it even still exists? So many questions ... so very little interest in the answers.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I've been doing some detective work on this. I want to know why they are escaping England for North America. My suspicion is there is some kind of sin they want to engage in and cannot do it their under the watchful eye of the Queen.

Whatever sin they are planning they will need protection from angry Christians like those of us here at Landover Baptist. President Trump, of course, will provide no protection for them. He stands against sin.

From my research, I have learned Canada will provide the couple with government paid guards. So, I still have not discovered what they will be up to but I've learned they need protection from angry Christians and Canada will provide it. If others here have figured out the sinful direction they are taking it would be helpful to share it here.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/3-financial-reasons-meghan-and-harry-are-smart-to-choose-canada-over-the-us-2020-01-14?mod=home-page

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There



What kind of message are they trying to send here?

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I have to say that I too am of the opinion that this is likely some kind of disinformation campaign. I have strong suspicions that they harbor designs to get ahold of California at least and then possibly America. Continued vigilance is what is required here. That and plenty of ammunition on hand.

Oh, yes, dear Brother Moss -- I do think you have hit the nail very squarely on the head here. There is a scheme underway with that pair, and it has nothing to do with goodness. Of that, we can be most certain!

I was speaking with my sister Agatha just a few moments ago, and she referred me to an article that has an excerpt from some comments that were made by that dear Sean Hannity. My, isn't he handsome, though? Oh, how he reminds me of that heart-throb, Clark Gable, even though I never watched worldly entertainment; although, I never miss watching Sean's broadcast. Anyway, Sean's friend in the discussion said Meghan is "uppity", and that Prince Harry is an "idiot". I will leave a link to their good comments here so you can judge for yourself.

https://www.mediamatters.org/sean-hannity/hannity-radio-producer-calls-meghan-markle-very-uppity

Now, then, another point that makes me wary of those two is the fact that Meghan is the mother of a boy who joins the English line of succession for the English throne. I'm no expert on any of these foreign matters, heavens above, but it does seem very strange to me that they (the Queen, in particular) would have allowed nigra blood to infiltrate their royal bloodlines. What were they thinking when they made the decision to allow Meghan into the family? Do they really want to risk a situation similar to that in the attached photo?

A blessed evening to you, Dear,
Sincerely, Isabella W.

[Alvin Moss]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I have to say that I too am of the opinion that this is likely some kind of disinformation campaign. I have strong suspicions that they harbor designs to get ahold of California at least and then possibly America. Continued vigilance is what is required here. That and plenty of ammunition on hand.

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Finally a little bit of good news has come along about the Meghan and Harry crisis. The Toronto Star published an editorial welcoming them to Canada. It said they will not be bothered with the race-baiting press of England. Keep them in Canada, let their sin filled lives influence you there and let Jesus guide the U.S.A.

Canada gets dibs on Meghan and Harry
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/edit...-our-gain.html

Oh, if only we could be assured that this couple will stay in Canada, dear Brother Mayor Hold, but I have a suspicion that they will infiltrate our blessed and be here more than they are up there. I mean, what's up there in the first place? Oh, I know people will rave about the "wide, open" spaces and how "natural" it is there. Well, that bound nation might have a population of what, 35 million or so scattered over a vast amount of land, but "natural" is the last thing that it is. With a homersexualism-loving Prime Minister, that country is anything but natural.

Mark my words, dear Mayor; the day will come (and very soon, too) when we will hear of Meghan & Harry schmoozing in with the likes of that Con-yay West and that dull wife of his.

A blessed day to you, Dear,
Sincerely, Isabella W.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Finally a little bit of good news has come along about the Meghan and Harry crisis. The Toronto Star published an editorial welcoming them to Canada. It said they will not be bothered with the race-baiting press of England. Keep them in Canada, let their sin filled lives influence you there and let Jesus guide the U.S.A.

Canada gets dibs on Meghan and Harry

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2020/01/10/harry-and-meghan-britains-loss-would-be-our-gain.html

[James Hutchins]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

It is the perversion of mixed race people and animals that infuriated God to create the Great Flood. The rampant homsexurality and the intermingling of races is damaging God's Plan®. The so called 'Climate Change' is God's way of warning His Children of the impending doom and a call to arms to prepare for a Earth Cleansing.
Some evangelical teachers today are claiming that Noah's flood did not cover the entire Earth nor all the mountains of the day. Further, they claim that Noah and the animals floated on a shallow, temporary inland sea caused by the flood, somehow covering only the Mesopotamian region. Thus, they must claim that the Earth’s entire human population was limited to this area, or that not all humans were killed in the flood. Is there really biblical evidence for claims of this nature?

1. All the Mountains Were Covered. The tops of all the high mountains under the entire heavens were at least 20 feet beneath the waters surface (Genesis 7:19-20). It would be absurd to think that a flood covering the highest mountains of the Middle East would not affect the rest of the world. In addition, the waters remained at this awesome, mountain-covering height for five months! (Genesis 7:18-24, 8:1-5).
2. The Ark Was Huge. The ark was necessary to prevent the extinction of humans and animals. If the Flood were merely local, God could have sent them to a safer part of the world. God warned Noah about the Flood 120 years prior to its start. Surely, Noah and his family could have traveled a great distance in that time. Also, if the Flood was local, the ark was unnecessarily large. Until the first metal ships were constructed in modern times, the ark was the largest ship ever built. It was big enough to house representative pairs of every created-kind of air-breathing, land animal on Earth.
3. Humans Populated the Entire World. After more than 1600 years of habitation on Earth, the planet's population was surely large (millions or billions). The Bible confirms that (a) Man had multiplied upon the face of the Earth (Genesis 6:1), (b) Violence and corruption filled the Earth (Genesis 6:11-12). The Bible is clear that man could not have existed only in the Mesopotamian region—a region too small to support such a large population, especially considering the natural dispersion affect of a violent society.
4. All Humans Were Killed. The Bible clearly teaches that all flesh died…every man (Genesis 7:21). Genesis 9:1 confirms that only Noah's family was saved and that every person living today is descended from his family.
5. All Air-Breathing, Land Animals Killed. The world's entire population of air-breathing, land animals died, except those taken into the ark (Genesis 7:21) - “everything on Earth” (Genesis 6:17) - "all living creatures of every kind on the Earth" (Genesis 9:16). If only those animals in a specific geographic location died, it would seem unnecessary for God to protect pairs in the ark for the express purpose of preventing their extinction. Surely there would be representatives of their kinds in other areas. If, on the other hand, there were some unique kinds of animals in the local flood's path, then it would seem more logical for God to send representative pairs out of the area, rather than to the ark, as He did. The Bible is clear that all the air-breathing, land animals perished during the flood, except those preserved with Noah - from which all modern animals are descended.
6. A “Cataclysm,” Not a Mere Flood. Both Hebrew (Old Testament) and Greek (New Testament) use words to describe Noah's flood which are different than the ordinary words for flood. In this way, Noah's flood was represented as a totally unique occurrence. [Hebrew: “Mabbool” / Greek: “Kataklusmos” (cataclysm)].
7. God’s Rainbow Promise. God promised never again to send a global flood (Genesis 8:21, 9:8-17). This promise is demonstrated by the symbol of the rainbow, a sign for God's promise to all the Earth. The rainbow is a sign to every living creature, mankind and animals. If this promise was not made to all creatures on Earth, then God has broken His promise. Local floods have repeatedly killed hundreds and even thousands of humans and animals since Noah's time.
8. Why Stay in the Ark a Year?! Noah was in the ark for more than a year, not just 40 days (Genesis 8:14). 53 weeks is absurdly long to stay in the ark for a local flood, since dry land would have been just over the horizon. After the flood waters had been going down for 4 months, the dove could still find no suitable ground (Genesis 8:9). This does not seem to fit the circumstances for a local flood in which the dove could fly to dry land. However, these situations are consistent if the Flood was global.
9. The Whole Earth Was Devastated. God said, "I am surely going to destroy both them (the people) and the Earth" (Genesis 6:13b). The global extent of the Flood is referred to more than 30 times in Genesis 6-9 alone! In Isaiah 54:9, God states, "I swore that the waters of Noah would never again cover the Earth." Peter delivered a clear global warning, confirming that God created the Earth, devastated it by the Flood, and will one day destroy it again by fire (2 Peter 3:5-7). Peter certainly did not mean that just a local area on Earth would be burned. Just as the Flood was global, so will be the final judgment.

The Bible specifically teaches that the Flood of Noah's time was global in extent and that all air-breathing, land animals and all humans were killed, except those saved in the Ark. How could the Bible be any more clear concerning the global nature of the Flood?! Or, if this was actually a local flood, how could the Bible have been any more misleading about its extent?!


Don't come crying to me when you heathens wake to find the water of God's Righteous indignation lapping at your box spring.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Reliable sources are slowly revealing the real reasons behind Prince Harry's escape plan to Godless Canada. A newspaper informs us what Harry is planning to do and it is nauseating.



Even in Godless England under the watchful eyes of the unnaturally Old Queer Elizabeth they still must know some pivotal verses of the Bible.

Deuteronomy 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

Will Prince Harriet continue in an unnatural relationship with Ms. Meghan or woo the rainbow-wielding Canuck PM Mr. Trudeau? We'll be following this news source which is apparently at least as reliable as Bloomberg or the FOX News which are as reliable as the KJV Bible.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer