[Jo Freddie]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

A rant that shows why The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is better then the Bible

Thank you Ezekiel, you rant is clear evidence that my religion is more suited to humanity then yours.

RAmen Brother

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

Get out and don't come back you fagot

As a Pastafarian if you want to insult me you need to try harder, meat balls are Holy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(food)

[Tertius The Scribe]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

As a Pastafarian if you want to insult me you need to try harder, meat balls are Holy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(food)

So I take it you're changing your name to "Jo Feddie And Peas" or "Mr. Brain's Jo Feddie" now, right?

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

As a Pastafarian if you want to insult me you need to try harder, meat balls are Holy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(food)

Now then, there will be no insults on THIS board. We are Christians after all and respect everyone except non-Christians.

You are missing the point, Jo Freddy. We have a book that explains our religion and Rachael Ray didn't write it. You have nothing but empty pasta boxes. Anyone can immediately see that our religion is deep and meaningful and yours is a sieve. No one can possible sleep at night believing some disgusting glob is going to touch then with a noodly appendage! Please get serious. It is obvious that the Holy Ghost 'came upon' Mary and produced JESUS but belief in a flying spaghetti-o is just nonsense.

Please, won't you take off that pirate hat and make a small donation to Landover for the sake of your soul? We ask for nothing, really. A thousand Euros now and again will be sufficient to save you. Well, and maybe a few doses of the electrodes.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

Please, won't you take off that pirate hat and make a small donation to Landover for the sake of your soul? We ask for nothing, really. A thousand Euros now and again will be sufficient to save you. Well, and maybe a few doses of the electrodes.

I have no intention of taking off my Holy Pirate hat, and any spare cash I have goes to the Churches ship building fund.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

I assure you we got nothing in common. No Catholic will ever admit to the horrible crimes his church has commited. He will also never admit that some of the most wicked men in history have been popes. He will turn a shade of white at the mention of the Vatican Ratlines that helped Nazis escape to South America to avoid trial. A Catholic will piss his pants if you so much as mention that they worship the Virgin Mary or idols. NO Catholic has ever believed in the biblical doctrine of justification. The "Church" of Rome does not allow it and calls it heresy. Many good men have been murdered by the so called "Church". Answer for her crimes papist.

So you do not believe in the things that I mentioned?

[David Goldman]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

So you do not believe in the things that I mentioned?

You are replying to a post almost 3 months old. You are a little late if you are expecting an answer.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

You are replying to a post almost 3 months old. You are a little late if you are expecting an answer.

I've been busy lately.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

I've been busy lately.

Did they let you out early for good behavior?

What's your parole officer's name?

[sr korgul]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

3. The divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ

Why do you prefer worshipping dead catholics then?

6. The infallible, inerrant Scriptures.

This show just how much you belive in the infallible, inerrant Scriptures

http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/num6.htm

Some interesting quotation from that papist attack to the Bible

(2) Scripture alone is not perspicuous enough (cf. 2 Peter 3:16) to resolve major doctrinal disputes or moral teachings

So scripture for you is not enough. It's interesting that the catholics quote a passage of the Scripture that warn against the evil practice of "interpretating" and use it to "prove" that we should just listen to their interpretation.

(1) the fact of over 20,000 Protestant denominations and sects in contrast to the unity of faith (Eph 4:5) in the Catholic Church

How specious can they get: Using such logic you could also say "In fact there are over 20000 non-mormon bapyist denomination in contrast to the unity of the faith of the mormon cult"

(4) SS implies nobody is bound to any interpretation but their own since all "churches" and any "traditions" are fallible

(4) Scripture alone -- being an inanimate object -- can't make any infallible and binding decisions concerning either canon or any (mis)interpretation -- Scripture is simply assumed by definition to be "self-interpreting" and "self-authenticating" without need of any infallible Church -- this begs two important questions

(a) How do I know the Bible *IS* the Word of God?

(b) How do I know *MY* interpretation of Scripture is correct?

a) Because the Bible itself say so

b) Why on Earth you should have an interpetation? You have to follow the bible You have not to "interpret" it.
All Catholic arguments are based on that false and absurd assumption.

7. Moral issues.

I'm not aware of children buggering being counted among the moral issues of any baptist church.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

Sr. Korgul wrote,

Why do you prefer worshipping dead catholics then?

I beg your pardon. The only One we worship is the Triune God.

This show just how much you belive in the infallible, inerrant Scriptures

I'm not going to go through all of that to show you all of the inconsistencies. I will look at the ones you point to:

So scripture for you is not enough. It's interesting that the catholics quote a passage of the Scripture that warn against the evil practice of "interpretating" and use it to "prove" that we should just listen to their interpretation.

The Scriptures never teach that it and it alone is the only authority. In fact, it says otherwise, e.g. 2 Thess. 2:14-15, Matt. 18:17-18

a) Because the Bible itself say so

1. Where does it say that it and it alone is the Word of God?

2. Where does it say what Books should even be in it?

b) Why on Earth you should have an interpetation? You have to follow the bible You have not to "interpret" it.

Elaborate please. I think I know what you are saying but I want you to clear it up for me.

I'm not aware of children buggering being counted among the moral issues of any baptist church.

What does "buggering" mean?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

What does "buggering" mean?

It's what your papist "fathers" do to altar boys every chance they get.

Don't play coy with us, ring-kisser.

[Nobar King]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

It's interesting that the origin of the verb 'to bugger' is from the Medieval Latin: Bulgarus, which is also known as a Bulgarian heretic. The Bulgarians were among the first adopters of the Catholic faith, and are considered a patriarchate. It's no wonder that they were the first to approve of the systematic molestation of young altar boys. Centuries later, you still can't trust the Bulgarians.

[Larry Lee]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

It's interesting that the origin of the verb 'to bugger' is from the Medieval Latin: Bulgarus, which is also known as a Bulgarian heretic. The Bulgarians were among the first adopters of the Catholic faith, and are considered a patriarchate. It's no wonder that they were the first to approve of the systematic molestation of young altar boys. Centuries later, you still can't trust the Bulgarians.

Fascinating. And to top it off, nowadays a lot of them are Mudslime.

[sr korgul]

Re: Some Things that we can agree upon

Sr. Korgul wrote,


I beg your pardon. The only One we worship is the Triune God.

I assumed that kissing the bones of dead catholics was an act of worship. It was a benevolent assumption. The only other possible explanation is necrophily. Are you suggesting that this is the true reason?

[QUOTE]The Scriptures never teach that it and it alone is the only authority. In fact, it says otherwise, e.g. 2 Thess. 2:14-15, Matt. 18:17-18/QUOTE]
Your quotations either talk about expedient tradition (wich, by the way, it's not law as per Mark 7:3,5) or the direct oral teaching of the apostles. Since the Bible was completed, oral teaching become useless.

[QUOTE]1. Where does it say that it and it alone is the Word of God?

2. Where does it say what Books should even be in it?/QUOTE]
Matthew 24:35 teaches that His Word will always be preserved. So we know that at least a trustful Bible come to us. All evidences point to the KJV 1611 (Praise!). By the way, Pastor Ezekiel has written an essay on the subject that clarify every possible doubt.

[QUOTE]Elaborate please. I think I know what you are saying but I want you to clear it up for me./QUOTE] God surely know how to speak clearly. You don't need interpretation of His Word. You just need to do as He says. It's pretty clear.