Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

[Isabella Abbey]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

No, then they wouldn't be agnostic. They would be some other misguided cult.

Get saved or get thine awful flavor out of the mouth of the Lord.

But, Agnostics aren't a cul ----

Ah, skip that for now. The Lord is already having a hard time with my flavor in His mouth, and He's showing that by making me really sleepy.

Off to get forty winks.....

[Isabella Abbey]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Why are you showing respect for Islamist terrorists, Aztek heart-eaters, thugee strangers, and similar filth? I say their beliefs are untrue. Even atheists says those beliefs are untrue.

Yet you won't discount allegiance to them and their baby-bombing, heart-chomping, throat-ringing ways.

Ah, Jeb. One thing that's easy to respect is your passion.



Even if it were to interfere with your reading comprehension.

Have you ever had a plate of lasagna with pomodoro sauce, sweet Italian sausage, and lots of basil, Jeb?

[Levi Jones]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

From an Agnostic perspective, there are equally fervent representatives of equally meritorious (to them, of course) claims to God's good favor.

More so than the Word of God as written in His perfect work to man?
Allow me to introduce you to the shame finger.

An Agnostic might submit that other editions of the Judeo-Christian Bible,

No, then they wouldn't be agnostic. They would be some other misguided cult.

for example, more closely translate the original text than KJV1611.

Erasmus' second edition of the Textus Receptus is perfect as it pulls from sources not tainted by the men with the pointy hats in Rome.

This might lead them to check the "undecided" box at the polls, so to speak, for reasons based as much in the sincerity of exactly the worship you mention as their own comfort.

No that's just being intellectually lazy.
Revelation 3:16 tells us.

So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

So there it is. Get saved or get thine awful flavor out of the mouth of the Lord.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Is it possible that Agnostics have strength and integrity, but they see merit in more than one belief and are showing respect by not claiming a whole-body, consummate allegiance they haven't yet cultivated?

Why are you showing respect for Islamist terrorists, Aztek heart-eaters, thugee strangers, and similar filth? I say their beliefs are untrue. Even atheists says those beliefs are untrue.

Yet you won't discount allegiance to them and their baby-bombing, heart-chomping, throat-ringing ways.

[Isabella Abbey]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Please post the Scripture that advocates for such fuzzy-headed "respect." God commands us to worship Him. What more is there to "cultivate?"

From an Agnostic perspective, there are equally fervent representatives of equally meritorious (to them, of course) claims to God's good favor. An Agnostic might submit that other editions of the Judeo-Christian Bible, for example, more closely translate the original text than KJV1611. This might lead them to check the "undecided" box at the polls, so to speak, for reasons based as much in the sincerity of exactly the worship you mention as their own comfort.

'Agnostic' is actually a relatively new word, as you certainly know. Before its etymology, the eternal "we" and "they" was much more strict and, accordingly, deceptively separatist...

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Is it possible that Agnostics have strength and integrity, but they see merit in more than one belief and are showing respect by not claiming a whole-body, consummate allegiance they haven't yet cultivated?

No.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Is it possible that Agnostics have strength and integrity, but they see merit in more than one belief and are showing respect by not claiming a whole-body, consummate allegiance they haven't yet cultivated?

Please post the Scripture that advocates for such fuzzy-headed "respect." God commands us to worship Him. What more is there to "cultivate?"

[Levi Jones]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Is it possible that Agnostics have strength and integrity, but they see merit in more than one belief and are showing respect by not claiming a whole-body, consummate allegiance they haven't yet cultivated?

That would be unitarianism. Agnostics endlessly straddle the fence.

There's that thinking I warned you about.

[Isabella Abbey]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Is it possible that Agnostics have strength and integrity, but they see merit in more than one belief and are showing respect by not claiming a whole-body, consummate allegiance they haven't yet cultivated?

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

It seems we have not talked about agnostics lately.

Basically an Agnostic says "I don't know or care if religion is true, I'm neutral, I'll await proof of which religion is true, if any."

So that means agnostics are saying "I don't know if highjacking a plane and flying it into a skyscraper sends you to a paradise filled with virgins."

They're saying "I'm neutral about the Cathaginian belief that murdering children on altars is how you keep the rain falling."

They're saying "I can't disprove the Thuggee belief that strangling random people by the roadside keeps the world in balance. I don't know or care if it's right or wrong.

Agnostics are nothing but spineless cowards who are trying to escape responsibility for their inactivity in the face of evil.

Any agnostics here that have enough spine to disagree with me?

Was that gutless unbelief system founded in Switzerland?

[Jenni111]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Y
This is where the ease of conversion comes in. Since they are in a frail, emotional state, they are not using logic or reason. This is perfect for getting them to convert to Christianity. I have converted many weak-willed agnostics using this method over the years.

That was nice of you

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Yes, agnostics are all those terrible things you have said, Brother Jeb, and I wholeheartedly agree. However, on the positive side, since they are so weak-willed and mentally clouded, they make good potential candidates for being converted. Their psychological makeup means they are primed for re-education and indoctrination.

The key is getting an agnostic to break down. When they fall onto their own emotions, they have nothing to stand on. A Christian will fall back on his faith, an atheist will fall back on "logic" or "reason", but an agnostic has nothing. They reach an existential predicament where they see a looming chasm underneath them. They realize they need to fill that chasm with something -- anything.

This is where the ease of conversion comes in. Since they are in a frail, emotional state, they are not using logic or reason. This is perfect for getting them to convert to Christianity. I have converted many weak-willed agnostics using this method over the years.

[David Goldman]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Agnostics are nothing but spineless cowards who are trying to escape responsibility for their inactivity in the face of evil.

Any agnostics here that have enough spine to disagree with me?

I can see their answer now:
"Well, maybe we are cowards, and maybe we're not. Which answer are you looking for?"

And you are right -- I think that's the root of their problem. They try to come across as sophisticated intellectuals standing above the fray, reserving judgment until all of the "facts" are in -- while there is no pressure on them.

But tie them to a wooden stake or put them before a firing squad, and I think that they would either deny or embrace God in a heartbeat -- whichever choice would let them keep their pathetic life for the moment.

I have never heard of an agnostic being martyred for their "maybe faith".

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Agnostics: irresponsible, spineless cowards for Satan

Any agnostics here that have enough spine to disagree with me?

I seriously doubt it, Brother Jeb. They are a spineless bunch. They don't even have the guts to defy Jesus directly, like the atheists do. They are a bunch of lazy cowards.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

It seems we have not talked about agnostics lately.

Basically an Agnostic says "I don't know or care if religion is true, I'm neutral, I'll await proof of which religion is true, if any."

So that means agnostics are saying "I don't know if highjacking a plane and flying it into a skyscraper sends you to a paradise filled with virgins."

They're saying "I'm neutral about the Carthaginian belief that murdering children on altars is how you keep the rain falling."

They're saying "I can't disprove the Thuggee belief that strangling random people by the roadside keeps the world in balance. I don't know or care if it's right or wrong.

Agnostics are nothing but spineless cowards who are trying to escape responsibility for their inactivity in the face of evil.

Any agnostics here that have enough spine to disagree with me?