[Jo Freddie]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

If God had been able to write down how he wanted them to spell the words, don't you think he would have written the Bible Himself?

That is the point, according to the doctrine he DID.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

No Billy Booty Boy... Im just as much a fool as many of the people in here, from what i can read!

and it seems to me, that words has a powerful meaning to you, so read my words with the same laugh as i read yours... not Gods... yours!

Yes, it looks as though you are about the fool that Jo Freddie is, if not a little moreso.

[Sister Christina]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Yes they mean the same, but that is not the point of this discussion, the language of "God" is claimed to be American, the language of the KJV-CFT is clearly NOT American.

If God had been able to write down how he wanted them to spell the words, don't you think he would have written the Bible Himself?

[thimmer]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Good day, hellbound fool. Would you please make an introduction before making a fool of yourself elsewhere on our forum.

No Billy Booty Boy... Im just as much a fool as many of the people in here, from what i can read!

and it seems to me, that words has a powerful meaning to you, so read my words with the same laugh as i read yours... not Gods... yours!

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

The fact that the Brits have a fetish for providing words with an extra 'u', does not change the meaning of the Holy Scriptures.

So you are saying that the KJV-CFT is the product of a fetish? How would a perfect being using the scribes to produce a perfect book have let that happen?

Again if they had a fetish for adding a "u" what other things have they added to the work?

Are these statements not the same?:
The color of the rose is red.
The colour of the rose is red.

Yes they mean the same, but that is not the point of this discussion, the language of "God" is claimed to be American, the language of the KJV-CFT is clearly NOT American.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Pasta boy? Shut up you lovely little gay guy... You wish to have a cock so deep inside of you - but you will never admit it!

oh and something more polite... sorry for me outburst, but you really piss me off!

This huy is on to something afterall....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch1UBta1sg4

Good day, hellbound fool. Would you please make an introduction before making a fool of yourself elsewhere on our forum.

[Sister Christina]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Not the same case at all. lets us have a look at what Rev. Jim Osborne has to say about the KJV-CFT

If the "secretaries" got the spelling wrong then the book is not perfect.

Or do you feel that Jimmys is wrong and there is room to improve the KJV-CFT by correcting the spelling?

Jimmy is not wrong. The Holy KJV1611 Bible is perfect. God tells us through that, exactly how to live our lives. The fact that the Brits have a fetish for providing words with an extra 'u', does not change the meaning of the Holy Scriptures.

Are these statements not the same?:
The color of the rose is red.
The colour of the rose is red.

If you are able to misinterpret these two sentences and give them different meaning, then please share what you come up with.

[thimmer]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

A bit off topic again, aren't you pastaboy? Neither of the quotes comes from this thread. Two heathens in this thread, and neither can abide by common courtesy... telling...

Pasta boy? Shut up you lovely little gay guy... You wish to have a cock so deep inside of you - but you will never admit it!

oh and something more polite... sorry for me outburst, but you really piss me off!

This huy is on to something afterall....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch1UBta1sg4

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

So what you're saying is that if I was American and had a British secretary to take my notes, everything he/she noted would be false?

You are cracking me up, Jo!

Not the same case at all. lets us have a look at what Rev. Jim Osborne has to say about the KJV-CFT

Is the Bible too liberal? Some conservatives say Yes (but go about it the wrong way)

Source: AOL News

It has been recently been brought to my attention that there is a group of well-meaning, but wrong group of Conservatives that seek to create a new translation of the Bible for the 21st century with a Conservative slant, and eradicating former liberal errors. It is called the "Conservative Bible Project". Now, I can understand why they are angry. Newer translations like the TNIV have perverted the Word of God®, replacing the masculinity of God with gender-neutral terms and downplaying Jesus's divinity.

But, I ask, don't these conservative reformists realize there is a perfect version of the Bible already? It's the AV1611 King James Bible! Now, I sympathize with their hatred of how liberals have hijacked Christianity and twisted Scripture to suit their own needs, but they are not being part of the solution and only adding to the problem with this newer translation.

What I fear most is that Christians might be led astray with this new heretical text. What we need to do is reinforce the truth that the AV1611 King James Bible is the best and most perfect Bible in the world.

If the "secretaries" got the spelling wrong then the book is not perfect.

Or do you feel that Jimmys is wrong and there is room to improve the KJV-CFT by correcting the spelling?

[Sister Christina]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Rules for unsaved trash

1. Lisa is right
2. Unsaved Trash ALWAYS is wrong.

Fixed it for you, Sister Lisa.

[Lisa H]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

new rules
1. Jo is wrong
2. Lisa is right

Rules for unsaved trash

1. Lisa is right
2. Unsaved Trash is wrong.

[Sister Christina]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

A point I answered here

You can't have it both ways, either the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is American, then the KJV-CFT has misspellings in it and therefore not perfect.
Or
The KJV-CFT has no errors in it, meaning that the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is NOT American

So what you're saying is that if I was American and had a British secretary to take my notes, everything he/she noted would be false?

You are cracking me up, Jo!

[the DANE muhaha]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

Now Jo, remember the rules I gave you. You are wrong on this.
Lisa is right and you are wrong.

new rules
1. Jo right
2. Lisa wrong

[Lisa H]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

A point I answered here

You can't have it both ways, either the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is American, then the KJV-CFT has misspellings in it and therefore not perfect.
Or
The KJV-CFT has no errors in it, meaning that the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is NOT American

Remember the view of this "Church" is that the scribes of the KJV-CFT where but tools of god and corrected mistakes, they did not add anything of their own to the work.

Is Reb wrong?

Now Jo, remember the rules I gave you. You are wrong on this.
Lisa is right and you are wrong.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Cranky Old Man Is A Liar!

I've already answered your question here.

A point I answered here

You can't have it both ways, either the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is American, then the KJV-CFT has misspellings in it and therefore not perfect.
Or
The KJV-CFT has no errors in it, meaning that the language of the God of the KJV-CFT is NOT American

Remember the view of this "Church" is that the scribes of the KJV-CFT where but tools of god and corrected mistakes, they did not add anything of their own to the work.

Is Reb wrong?

The Perfect Word:

The King James Bible