X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    He's still alive, evil. I had dinner with him this month!
    Are you using the device common in newspaper headlines of using a comma as shorthand for "and"? If so, why would you want to have dinner with an evildoer?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    He's still alive, evil. I had dinner with him this month! And also, I'll say it again, I don't believe in Satan.
    Your "goddess" is none other than satan. Face reality, queer!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Is this before or after you lured him off into the woods and killed him as a sacrifice to Satan?
    He's still alive, evil. I had dinner with him this month! And also, I'll say it again, I don't believe in Satan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    Idiot, I said it was not sexual! I am still a virgin and happy at that. He looked upon me with regard and favor. He was a gentleman.
    Is this before or after you lured him off into the woods and killed him as a sacrifice to Satan?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by JennyD View Post
    So, you didn't reciprocate when your master used you sexually?

    And now you brag about it. Charming. Very ladylike, you are.

    ...


    And what about "diss"? That's pure Niglish!

    Idiot, I said it was not sexual! I am still a virgin and happy at that. He looked upon me with regard and favor. He was a gentleman.

    Leave a comment:


  • JennyD
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Bacon View Post
    I'm not jealous. I had a relationship with my choirmaster who was not part of the clergy. Not sexual in any way either. There are some that are non-reciprocating.
    So, you didn't reciprocate when your master used you sexually?

    And now you brag about it. Charming. Very ladylike, you are.

    ...

    Originally posted by Acrid: Smell of Burning
    Surley is a misspelling. A simple mistake that any human would make.
    And what about "diss"? That's pure Niglish!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    I'm not jealous. I had a relationship with my choirmaster who was not part of the clergy. Not sexual in any way either. There are some that are non-reciprocating.

    Fear is a sin? Since when? If you are a true Christian, you know that fear of the omnipresent God is what keeps you living the life you do. Therefore, I state, that you have incriminated yourself to the same sin that you claim the Jews have committed and therefore have falled from grace.

    Alright I admit I was doing this after being up for quite some time yesterday. The word funnest would be replaced with the most fun and dis would be replaced with refusal to consider. Happy!

    Surley is a misspelling. A simple mistake that any human would make.

    Leave a comment:


  • see_the_light
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    The only problems the Catholic Church has had with their clergy over the last few years is that they've been having inappropriate relationships with the choirboys. I was a choirgirl in all senses of the word. I wasn't eaten.
    I see...

    Well to be honest I don't, they eat choirboys, not choirgirls? Is that it? You are jealous? Or by the "in all senses" you mean they ... but then they didn't eat you? Are you calling them egoistic non reciprocating... something like that?

    enlighten me


    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    Although it may be true that the candles produce carbon dioxide, we produce 14 gallons/day of the same gas. Don't give me that without the proper research. Global warming was bound to happen with or without candles. I use candles in relaxation baths, does that make me evil? Just as you seem to be afraid of the cults forming around you, the Jews were afraid of the change Jesus brought. It's not a crime.
    Please feel free to use the link and find the research, the quote is not mine.

    BUT... "afraid of... Jesus" you are right, it is not a CRIME, it is A SIN! THE SIN, and in the joos case, their unforgivable sin.....

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    Go read Shakespeare! Get a Mariam and Webster's dictionary and look up the archaic words Child of Oden uses. Every educated person knows that the word, "art" is used as a verb and usually holds the meaning of our current word "are". Goth rockers are the funnest to play along with. Don't diss.
    My Webster seems lacking on some words... "funnest"??? "Diss"????

    PRAISE THE LORD!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    Surely is a word that has the derivative of sure as in certain. Surely is the adverb to it in which it describes the verb are in that sense.
    I know what surely means, I was asking about Surley.
    There is a translation for that holiday, but it's written in many dialects. I understand what you see, but you won't stop what you believe anyway. Also, it's a minority that MOLEST the children. We're coming on a society where that's becoming comonplace.
    I'm not sure which I'm more flabberghasted by - your assertion that most Jews who put little babies' winkies in their mouths are doing it in a perfectly nice, innocent way, or your claim that childmolesting is commonplace. Do you live in Massachusetts or something?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    I never claimed Joos ate Jew babies! That'd just be ridiculous.

    Oh, so they're completely fine and they've got no problems at all, bar the minor detail that they rape kids?


    That's nothing to boast about.


    And Surley? What does Surley mean?

    Which is dumber - misspelling the name of a cult or bothering to spend your time looking up information on a bunch of penny-pinchers who are going to hell anyway? For your information, there is no "correct" spelling of Chanukkah, since the word itself is only a rough transliteration of whatever demon characters it was originally written in.
    That certainly doesn't sound like a lame excuse for a Jew pervert to give little babies herpes by putting their johnsons in his mouth at all.
    Surely is a word that has the derivative of sure as in certain. Surely is the adverb to it in which it describes the verb are in that sense. There is a translation for that holiday, but it's written in many dialects. I understand what you see, but you won't stop what you believe anyway. Also, it's a minority that MOLEST the children. We're coming on a society where that's becoming comonplace.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    If they ate the children, then explain why the Germans of WWII had a problem with them for being in almost every business. Children took and still take over the family businesses in Jewish families.
    I never claimed Joos ate Jew babies! That'd just be ridiculous.
    The other christians eat chicken or pork or beef. We're human, not animals. If they eat choirboys, then why are they trusted. The only problems the Catholic Church has had with their clergy over the last few years is that they've been having inappropriate relationships with the choirboys.
    Oh, so they're completely fine and they've got no problems at all, bar the minor detail that they rape kids?

    I don't think you actually know a furry, but I do.
    That's nothing to boast about.

    Go read Shakespeare! Get a Mariam and Webster's dictionary and look up the archaic words Child of Oden uses. Every educated person knows that the word, "art" is used as a verb and usually holds the meaning of our current word "are".
    And Surley? What does Surley mean?
    Originally posted by Child of Odin View Post
    No, she is simply misinformed. By the way, the original poster of this thread spelled both the Jews' name and the name of their holiday wrongly. Dumbass.
    Which is dumber - misspelling the name of a cult or bothering to spend your time looking up information on a bunch of penny-pinchers who are going to hell anyway? For your information, there is no "correct" spelling of Chanukkah, since the word itself is only a rough transliteration of whatever demon characters it was originally written in.
    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    It was in a desparate attempt to stop the bleeding from a circumscision that a doctor would suck (and subsiquently spit out) the blood from the wound. Is that clear yet?
    That certainly doesn't sound like a lame excuse for a Jew pervert to give little babies herpes by putting their johnsons in his mouth at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Are you a filthy joo and an alcoholic too? Son, you are really lost.
    The original name was Aki meaning fall in Japanese. I have knowledge of Jewish traditions as well as many others. My favorite is Greecian. I can't stand the smell let alone the taste of alcohol and drink only when my parents and doctors tell me that I would benefit from it which is only when I've been eating too little.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by Alky: Child of Baccus View Post
    Alright brother, cool it just a little.

    It was in a desparate attempt to stop the bleeding from a circumscision that a doctor would suck (and subsiquently spit out) the blood from the wound. Is that clear yet?
    Are you a filthy joo and an alcoholic too? Son, you are really lost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alky: Child of Baccus
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Alright brother, cool it just a little.

    It was in a desparate attempt to stop the bleeding from a circumscision that a doctor would suck (and subsiquently spit out) the blood from the wound. Is that clear yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • Child of Odin
    replied
    Re: JOO Hanukkia CONSPIRACY

    Originally posted by VictoryOS View Post
    So they suck the blood out of the wound with...the mouth of the wound? The mouth itself actually has a wound, and another mouth pops out of the wound and starts sucking...something or somebody?

    ...in which they suck out the blood from the wounds with the mouth from the wound...

    That's the part that gets me. The mouth sucks itself after it wounds itself? I'd research it if I could figure out just what the hell you're saying. How does a wound have a mouth? Or is the mouth a figurative wound? I don't get it.

    But since you brought up the subject of research, perhaps you should do your own research into our Church. Maybe read the FAQ or the TOS...
    No, she is simply misinformed. By the way, the original poster of this thread spelled both the Jews' name and the name of their holiday wrongly. Dumbass.

    Leave a comment:

Working...