Ockham's Principle of Economy:
This is clearly a conscious and wicked attempt to remove God from philosophy, science, and the mind of man.
We can account for many things in the natural world. By applying Ockham's Razor, we restrain ourselves from assuming more than is necessary to generate explanations of what we observe.
This may seem perfectly reasonable, but there is one problem with it: God represents an assumption additional to the entities observed in any observable cause and effect chain. If we accept Ockham's Razor, then we cannot import unnecessary assumptions like God into our theories and explanations. We would have to assume that only the men who wrote the Bible are responsible for its existence. We would have to assume that natural laws are sufficient to explain natural events, and that they are not guided by mysterious, praeternatural forces.
Therefore we must reject Ockham's Razor on principle. It is clearly designed for one thing: to slit the throat of the Baby Jesus, even as he layeth in the manger!
It is futile to do with more things that which can be done with fewer
We can account for many things in the natural world. By applying Ockham's Razor, we restrain ourselves from assuming more than is necessary to generate explanations of what we observe.
This may seem perfectly reasonable, but there is one problem with it: God represents an assumption additional to the entities observed in any observable cause and effect chain. If we accept Ockham's Razor, then we cannot import unnecessary assumptions like God into our theories and explanations. We would have to assume that only the men who wrote the Bible are responsible for its existence. We would have to assume that natural laws are sufficient to explain natural events, and that they are not guided by mysterious, praeternatural forces.
Therefore we must reject Ockham's Razor on principle. It is clearly designed for one thing: to slit the throat of the Baby Jesus, even as he layeth in the manger!

Comment