X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by trexsikh View Post
    To all the above posters:

    1) Yes Sikhs are not muslims, the turban (if people started reading and stopped watching tv they would know) is exclusively worn by the Sikhs. Unshorn hair is an article of faith for us.

    2) It's not a knife, it's a kirpan. Sikhs are to be armed for self defence and protection of the weak. 0ur history very well demonstrates this. Well probably put all you internet warriors to shame.

    3) No, we are not emotionally vested in mosques, churches, libraries etc getting burned or people being shot. "Sarbat Da Bhala" Peace and well being of all mankind is a fundamental principle of Sikhi and unique to it. Unlike semetic religions we don't divide people into believers, non believers and then waste time spewing hatred.
    Again a Sikh equivocates.

    Leave a comment:


  • WWJDnow
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by trexsikh View Post
    Sikhs are to be armed for self defence and protection of the weak. 0ur history very well demonstrates this.
    How's that self-defense thing working out for you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by Zechariah Smyth View Post
    I love how the claim is made that the "kirpan" is not a knife...

    [ATTACH]19562[/ATTACH]

    Whatever.

    Oh what a fun game! I'm next!

    This is not a woman's boot:

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    I love how the claim is made that the "kirpan" is not a knife...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	terrorist_knife.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	14.6 KB
ID:	1916287

    Whatever.

    Leave a comment:


  • trexsikh
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by Bob4God View Post
    And you're so humble about it.
    If you insist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob4God
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by trexsikh View Post
    2) It's not a knife, it's a kirpan. Sikhs are to be armed for self defence and protection of the weak. 0ur history very well demonstrates this. Well probably put all you internet warriors to shame.

    And you're so humble about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • trexsikh
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by Zechariah Smyth View Post
    Because they are so peaceful and loving!



    History, Books, Common Sense. Look it up.

    Leave a comment:


  • trexsikh
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    To all the above posters:

    1) Yes Sikhs are not muslims, the turban (if people started reading and stopped watching tv they would know) is exclusively worn by the Sikhs. Unshorn hair is an article of faith for us.

    2) It's not a knife, it's a kirpan. Sikhs are to be armed for self defence and protection of the weak. 0ur history very well demonstrates this. Well probably put all you internet warriors to shame.

    3) No, we are not emotionally vested in mosques, churches, libraries etc getting burned or people being shot. "Sarbat Da Bhala" Peace and well being of all mankind is a fundamental principle of Sikhi and unique to it. Unlike semetic religions we don't divide people into believers, non believers and then waste time spewing hatred.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Originally posted by WWJDnow View Post
    Then why do you all carry knives?
    Because they are so peaceful and loving!

    Leave a comment:


  • WWJDnow
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by sick raghead terrorist View Post
    as mentioned, sikhs are a peaceful religion
    Then why do you all carry knives?

    Leave a comment:


  • sick raghead terrorist
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    the sikh reply to this question is

    NO, he should not have attacked any person

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure



    I know you are just an indian (not a woo-woo one) but have some backbone man! You all come off like a bunch of limp wristed fairies at halloween.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    Originally posted by sick raghead terrorist View Post
    I am one sikh and my views may not be shared by others.

    as mentioned, sikhs are a peaceful religion (like in all religions, not everyone is a true sikh so there are idiots who bring our name down by doing selfish hurtful acts). So to come to our temple with no warning and no motive apart from to scare us into going back to india was extremely hurtful - to me at least.

    In our religion, there is no such thing as 'eye for an eye' and we do not force the religion upon anyone.

    Should the gunman have attacked a mosque instead? well my personal opinion has many views on this - this is just one;

    as a retaliation for 9/11 - you are a bit late but if still bitter, it makes no sense to stoop to the level of alqaeda and try on take on a mosque with a gun. I am guessing that alqaeda would have been unfazed by an attack to muslims who are innocent. muslims who are opposed to alqaeda. in their eyes, you would have been doing them a favour - less work for them.
    What non answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • sick raghead terrorist
    replied
    Re: A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    I am one sikh and my views may not be shared by others.

    as mentioned, sikhs are a peaceful religion (like in all religions, not everyone is a true sikh so there are idiots who bring our name down by doing selfish hurtful acts). So to come to our temple with no warning and no motive apart from to scare us into going back to india was extremely hurtful - to me at least.

    In our religion, there is no such thing as 'eye for an eye' and we do not force the religion upon anyone.

    Should the gunman have attacked a mosque instead? well my personal opinion has many views on this - this is just one;

    as a retaliation for 9/11 - you are a bit late but if still bitter, it makes no sense to stoop to the level of alqaeda and try on take on a mosque with a gun. I am guessing that alqaeda would have been unfazed by an attack to muslims who are innocent. muslims who are opposed to alqaeda. in their eyes, you would have been doing them a favour - less work for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • A Question for our Sikh Vistors over the New York Massacure

    I have noticed that you Sikhs have protested over and over again that you are not Muslims. That Sikhs are peaceful, unlike Muslims. Does this mean you think gunman would be correct if he had attacked a New York mosque instead?

    Please enlighten us.
Working...