People who follow discussions on Christianity may wonder who is arguing from a True Christian™ perspective and who is arguing from a pseudo-Christian, fluffy-bunny perspective. There is an easy way to tell the two apart, namely, the completely different approaches that the two take to the Bible.
True Christians™ approach God's Word with no preconceived notions of what God meant to say. We read Bible teachings in the context in which they appear and also in the context of the entire Bible, which, being God's Perfect Word, never contradicts itself. We read them for their literal meaning unless they are clearly identified as parables or the like. In short, we have enough faith in the Lord that we trust Him to get His point across.
By contrast, liberal false Christians start the analysis with their own personal opinions of what God should want. They pick and choose Bible verses, or even fragments of Bible verses, that, when taken out of context, appear to back up those personal opinions. They often have to "interpret" those verses beyond recognition to make them fit. When a True Christian™ quotes another Bible verse that refutes their "interpretation," they answer with that all-purpose scathing rebuttal known as "La la la, I can't hear you." In short, they imagine that they know what God wants than better He does.
That assumes that liberal false Christians even bother to quote the Bible at all. They may ask rhetorically, "Doesn't the Bible say ...?", in which case the answer is almost always "No." Alternatively, they may assert that God whispers into their ears, giving them special revelations denied to the rest of us.
The next time you encounter a thread in which members of this church discuss Scripture with others, please bear the above in mind. You will soon see who is proclaiming God's Truth and who is parroting the devil's lies.
True Christians™ approach God's Word with no preconceived notions of what God meant to say. We read Bible teachings in the context in which they appear and also in the context of the entire Bible, which, being God's Perfect Word, never contradicts itself. We read them for their literal meaning unless they are clearly identified as parables or the like. In short, we have enough faith in the Lord that we trust Him to get His point across.
By contrast, liberal false Christians start the analysis with their own personal opinions of what God should want. They pick and choose Bible verses, or even fragments of Bible verses, that, when taken out of context, appear to back up those personal opinions. They often have to "interpret" those verses beyond recognition to make them fit. When a True Christian™ quotes another Bible verse that refutes their "interpretation," they answer with that all-purpose scathing rebuttal known as "La la la, I can't hear you." In short, they imagine that they know what God wants than better He does.
That assumes that liberal false Christians even bother to quote the Bible at all. They may ask rhetorically, "Doesn't the Bible say ...?", in which case the answer is almost always "No." Alternatively, they may assert that God whispers into their ears, giving them special revelations denied to the rest of us.
The next time you encounter a thread in which members of this church discuss Scripture with others, please bear the above in mind. You will soon see who is proclaiming God's Truth and who is parroting the devil's lies.



<--- Very Masculine,
Comment