X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by paulhrobertson View Post
    I agree with you. After reading all these gender assignments I am seriously gonna have a headache.
    The correct term to use in conversation is now:

    2SLGBTQIA+

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Satan at the the last count had expressed 428. Hybrid genders are the latest abomination, resulting in an exponential increase it's difficult to accommodate in a simple chart. Working on it however. Think am going nuts but yes, that is what they say so will post soon.

    If only they'd read The Bible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cranky Old Man
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    There are only two genders. The superior male gender of God, Jesus and myself and the inferior female gender.

    I have no doubt it has been inferior females who came up with this utter nonsense of 100 genders.

    Leave a comment:


  • paulhrobertson
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    I agree with you. After reading all these gender assignments I am seriously gonna have a headache.
    Originally posted by WWJDnow View Post
    This is all going to get very confusing when we start assigning opronouns. That's why I suggest we stick with male, female, and sinful.

    Leave a comment:


  • WWJDnow
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    This is all going to get very confusing when we start assigning opronouns. That's why I suggest we stick with male, female, and sinful.

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Thank you for your question. I will include three descriptions and two flags, somewhat derivative; the sources are easy enough to locate so I won't link those.

    Perhaps the made-up word seeks to avoid onomatopœia or to distinguish itself from the disease? Who knows. For the zodiacgenderagenderfluid scene, however, their orientation is connected with the constellation. Supposedly it influences the vibes coming from the sun even though the sun is nowhere near that portion of the sky when the influence is occurring. Satan is responsible in that case as The Bible makes plain. For cancer's gender though I'm happy to provide a source (for reference purposes) but would recommend not reading if using public transport.

    The gender of cancer

    Today cancer is seen as a disease that affects both sexes roughly equally. This is, however, a relatively recent development. Until the mid-twentieth century, cancer was viewed as a pathology mainly affecting women, because female malignancies produced typical symptoms, and were easier to detect. In the twentieth century, women’s cancers – of breast and uterus – became the principal targets of public campaigns to promote the early detection of malignant tumours. From the 1950s on, the development of more efficient diagnostic methods and the increase in the prevalence of lung cancer, a disease found more often in men, put an end to the image of cancer as a female pathology. On the other hand, cancers of female reproductive organs continue to be more visible in public discourse and the media than those of male reproductive organs, and preventive – and mutilating – forms of surgery are more often proposed for women at risk from these pathologies.

    Keywords: I have decided not to include any keywords

    Outline (some of the topics) I have decided to list just one

    Mothers and sinners: female cancers in the nineteenth
    century

    That should explain the spelling. Cancegender and cancer gender are two different things. Just to make sure I checked three sources for the former:


    Cancegender or agenderfluid is a fluid gender identity that is mainly agender but can experience fluctuating or fluid feelings of gender correlating with their emotions. These feelings can be deeply upsetting to the individual experiencing them and can make their emotional state unstable, which can cause gender changes, though it typically returns to agender.

    Cancegender is a zodiacgender based on the constellation Cancer.
    Cancegender or Agenderfluid is a gender identity where one primarily uses agender as their “base” gender but can experience fluid and/or fluxing gender feelings in tandem with their emotions. These feelings may be confusing or upsetting to the individual and cause their emotional state to go unstable, resulting in gender changes. This term can alternatively be referred to as agenderfluid, but it is different in the sense that it is related to your emotions.

    Cancegender is a zodiacgender based on the constellation Cancer.
    Cancegender/Agenderfluid Agender as “base” gender but experiences fluid/fluxing gender feelings in tandem with their emotions. These gender feelings may confuse or upset the individual and cause their emotional state to go haywire, which causes more gender changes; A fluid gender identity where one’s “base” gender is agender. They may experience other gendered feelings, but they always return to feeling agender.
    I hope this is helpful.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • lukasekman
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Looks like those Tide Pod chewing SJWs spelled cancergender wrong. But that's what happens when atheists reject Jesus and accept cancer as the next way to evolve.



    "Thou shalt have no other gods before me."
    - Exodus 20:3

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by MitzaLizalor View Post
    MIN refers to the full gamut of masculinity. Thus panmingender comprises all (pan) the-range-of-masculine-genders (min) encountered as a gender experience (gender) but pangendermin is all-the-genders-available-to-one (pangender) when all of those genders fall-under-the-umbrella-of-attributes-primarily-related-to-masculinity (min) as that individual sees them.
    Thank you so much for the clarification, Sister. That is by far the least confusing explanation of gender-related nomenclature that I have ever seen. If only God had seen fit for you to be born a man, you would have made an excellent lexicographer.

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
    "they"
    Unfortunately when looking up my last answer I discovered several new pronouns. It takes a while to untangle definitions and cross-reference different sources. The panmingender/pangendermin example, for instance.

    There's another horrific trend being cooked up to factorially and exponentially increase the gender options; I'm trying to work out how to present that. It involves prefixes.

    I'll have to adjust pronouns in my next update too: they seem to be making up new cases and creating machiavellian charts. Thank you for taking an interest.
    Last edited by MitzaLizalor; 11-21-2020, 12:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by MitzaLizalor View Post
    The same as pangendermin. Pangender is a type of multigender, that is where someone experiences all genders. (It's worth noting that "experiences all genders" is a passive phenomenon whereas "expressing all genders" would be the active form.) Enter the concept of all genders available to one throughout one's life.

    Pangender [min] therefore applies to someone for whom only masculine genders are available. That means according to their perception of a] what's available and b] whatever they think masculine is.

    MIN refers to the full gamut of masculinity. Thus panmingender comprises all (pan) the-range-of-masculine-genders (min) encountered as a gender experience (gender) but pangendermin is all-the-genders-available-to-one (pangender) when all of those genders fall-under-the-umbrella-of-attributes-primarily-related-to-masculinity (min) as that individual sees them.

    Of course, simply by going to Cambodia or Indonesia one sees that attributes considered masculine are not in any way a constant. There are other elements to factor in but this reply is long enough.
    Good grief. This is too complicated. I need a drink now. Is there a gender for that?

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    What is panmingender
    The same as pangendermin. Pangender is a type of multigender, that is where someone experiences all genders. (It's worth noting that "experiences all genders" is a passive phenomenon whereas "expressing all genders" would be the active form.) Enter the concept of all genders available to one throughout one's life.

    Pangender [min] therefore applies to someone for whom only masculine genders are available. That means according to their perception of a] what's available and b] whatever they think masculine is.

    MIN refers to the full gamut of masculinity. Thus panmingender comprises all (pan) the-range-of-masculine-genders (min) encountered as a gender experience (gender) but pangendermin is all-the-genders-available-to-one (pangender) when all of those genders fall-under-the-umbrella-of-attributes-primarily-related-to-masculinity (min) as that individual sees them.

    Of course, simply by going to Cambodia or Indonesia one sees that attributes considered masculine are not in any way a constant. There are other elements to factor in but this reply is long enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by handmaiden View Post
    And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.
    Perhaps a plethora of gender identities is needed to satisfy the ego needs of a surfeit of demons inhabiting ones naughty parts? (Or one desperate little ego with a need to feel special?)
    The "plethora of gender identities" describes well the successful work of Satan as he spreads sin across our country.

    I saw a disturbing bit of false news recently. It claimed the handsome, manly and Christian son of President Trump, Barron, uses the word "they" when referring to another boy or girl among his contemporaries. Our Christian President would not tolerate such behavior in any of his children so we can disregard such nonsense.

    https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughi...0the%20change.

    Leave a comment:


  • handmaiden
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
    They were saying? Oh Sister Bas, for a moment there I thought you were pluralizing that strange woman, and wondered whether she had insisted that "her pronouns" were plural. It is a relief to realize that you were talking about both people in the conversation!


    All that I can think of now is the story in the Gospel of Mark in which a man is possessed by a great multitude of demons. (We can also read about him in Matthew and Luke. . . I'm not sure why John gave him a pass.)


    Sister Isabella just mentioned this very story recently in another thread.


    Mark 5:9

    And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.


    Perhaps a plethora of gender identities is needed to satisfy the ego needs of a surfeit of demons inhabiting ones naughty parts? (Or one desperate little ego with a need to feel special?)

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
    This is all very confusing. Once I overheard that nasty woman Dolores talking to some other person in her field of "science" (falsely so called, 1 Timothy 6:20) and they were saying that sex is biological and gender is cultural. In other words, sex is what people are born with and gender is made up.
    They were saying? Oh Sister Bas, for a moment there I thought you were pluralizing that strange woman, and wondered whether she had insisted that "her pronouns" were plural. It is a relief to realize that you were talking about both people in the conversation!

    Much as it goes against one's feminine intuition to pay Dolores and/or her associates any attention at all (and my husband tells me that the concept of feminine intuition is nonsense - like gender - and reliably wrong about 99% of the time), nevertheless the bit highlighted in blue looks correct. In the KJV (1611) the word is used as a verb meaning "beget", or sometimes, possibly, "cause". So there is no such noun as "gender", unless perhaps you are some sort of foreigner - which fortunately is not the case here.

    Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
    So basically, people who have enough time on their hands to come up with 400+ different genders are some sort of lazy bums who are not contributing members of the society.
    Indeed. I do very much appreciate Sister Mitza's work here, though, in documenting their folly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: 100 Gender Identities?

    This is all very confusing. Once I overheard that nasty woman Dolores talking to some other person in her field of "science" (falsely so called, 1 Timothy 6:20) and they were saying that sex is biological and gender is cultural.

    In other words, sex is what people are born with and gender is made up. So basically, people who have enough time on their hands to come up with 400+ different genders are some sort of lazy bums who are not contributing members of the society. (If they were contributing members of the society, they wouldn't have time to come up with 400+ gender classifications).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X