I remember growing up with this and enjoying it! Kindergarten and School encouraged it, of course. Those days are, luckily, long gone.
X
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
I remember growing up with this and enjoying it! Kindergarten and School encouraged it, of course. Those days are, luckily, long gone.
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
It called me a Heffalump. I feel I have grounds to sue.Originally posted by MisterM View PostThere is even Winnie-The-Poop personality test. They are trying to get innocent children to associate themselves to these monsters. Would you like you kid to think himself as depressed homersexual? I don't.
YiC M
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
There is even Winnie-The-Poop personality test. They are trying to get innocent children to associate themselves to these monsters. Would you like you kid to think himself as depressed homersexual? I don't.
YiC M
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
You are certainly right to be worried. Winnie the Pooh is nothing more than blasphemy sugar-coated with talking animals. The proper term for this kind of sin is "anthropomorphism," also colloquially known as "Furry Syndrome," and it's a deadly, sinful import from none other than African paganism, where every ape, lion, and gourd has a mouth. Biblically, either these animals have been given speech by the Lord (as in Numbers 22:28), or they have been possessed by demons (as in Matthew 8:30-32), and considering how these animals spend all their time talking about sharing and doing good to others, and none talking about the Lord God, I think we can safely assume that it is the latter.
In other words, Winnie the Pooh is a teddy bear possessed by a wicked demon, as are all the other talking animals. All of them should be rebuked in Jesus' name and probably burned, and Christopher Robin should be stoned as per Leviticus 20:27 simply for associating with evil spirits like that. He himself is no doubt a wicked sinner, perverting God's word and treating demons as friends.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
No, Disney is just another arm of the American Cultural Imperialist machine, like McDonald's and Starbucks.Originally posted by Alphonse Alban View PostOf course Disney invented these perverted stories and we know perfectly well why you are trying to defend Walt Disney. It is in Disneyland where you go pray to your meatballs.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
Of course Disney invented these perverted stories and we know perfectly well why you are trying to defend Walt Disney. It is in Disneyland where you go pray to your meatballs.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
That explains a lot CranksOriginally posted by Cranky Old Man View PostI have never used any medication, or visited a doctor for that matter, in my life.
You do understand the concept of transfer of copyright?And you are even more retarded than I already expected if you don't realize Winnie is a Disney invention. Alan Alexander Milne no doubt stole the idea for his books from Disney. Notice the small print in this image clearly states Disney, not Milne, owns the copyright.
A. A. Milne left the rights to Pooh, and his other characters, to five beneficiaries: The Garrick Club, Westminster School, The Royal Literary Fund, the A. A. Milne Family and the E. H. Shepard Family. Mrs. Milne sold the film rights to Disney in 1961. Christopher Robin Milne sold his rights to the other copyright holders before his death in 1996.
Sometime around 1998, the Garrick Club sold Disney the rights to all of A. A. Milne's characters until 2026 (when the copyright expires). On March 4, 2001, the Sunday Times of London reported that Disney paid an estimated $340-to-$350 million for the rights to the royalty stream, as well as future use of the characters in any media, from the A. A. Milne Trust.
Disney first bought rights to Winnie-The-Pooh (enabling it to use the Pooh characters freely in movies, television shows, theme parks and merchandising) in 1961 and has renewed those rights every year, paying twice-yearly royalties to a group of rights holders. Disney now has the rights to the Winnie-The-Pooh until the copyright expires in 2026. The copyright holders received lump-sum payments for their interests, rather than having to collect their money a bit at a time over the next 25 years. They will retain the publishing rights to the original A.A. Milne book.
Dutton Books was the original copyright holder for his published works, and have a copyright on the books and classic illustrations.
The heirs of Stephen Slesinger, who bought the US rights from "Pooh" author A A Milne in 1930 and began licensing them to Disney in 1961, claim the powerful firm has cheated them out of hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties.
Mr Slesinger's widow agreed to negotiate the rights deal with Disney after his death.
A first agreement was reached in 1961 and renegotiated in 1983.
On 19 February 2007 Disney lost a court case in Los Angeles which ruled their "misguided claims" to dispute the licensing agreements with Slesinger, Inc. were unjustified, but a federal ruling of 28 September 2009, from Judge Florence-Marie Cooper, determined that the Slesinger family had granted all trademark and copyright rights to Disney, although Disney must pay royalties for all future use of the characters. Both parties have expressed satisfaction with the outcome.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
They are all "boys", why they are hugging and smiling like that?!? I have seen similar kind of images on web sites that are full of pornographic material. And only meant for gaysexuals.Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post

YiC, M
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
I have never used any medication, or visited a doctor for that matter, in my life.Originally posted by Jo Freddie View PostPardon Cranks? have you been neglecting your medication again? ... bla bla bla ...
And you are even more retarded than I already expected if you don't realize Winnie is a Disney invention. Alan Alexander Milne no doubt stole the idea for his books from Disney. Notice the small print in this image clearly states Disney, not Milne, owns the copyright.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
Pardon Cranks? have you been neglecting your medication again?Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View PostWhen Walt Disney created this Winnie The Poop bear.
During the first World War, troops from Winnipeg (Manitoba, Canada) were being transported to eastern Canada, on their way to Europe, where they were to join the 2nd Canadian Infantry Brigade. When the train stopped at White River, Ontario, a lieutenant called Harry Colebourn bought a small female black bear cub for $20 from a hunter who had killed its mother. He named her 'Winnipeg', after his hometown of Winnipeg, or 'Winnie' for short.
Winnie became the mascot of the Brigade and went to Britain with the unit. When the Brigade was posted to the battlefields of France, Colebourn, now a Captain, took Winnie to the London Zoo for a long loan. He formally presented the London Zoo with Winnie in December 1919 where he became a popular attraction and lived until 1934.
The bear was also very popular with Christopher Robin, son of author A.A. Milne. It was his favourite animal at the Zoo, and he often spent time inside the cage with it. The bear was Christopher Robin's inspiration for calling his own teddy bear Winnie... Winnie the Pooh (this teddy bear started out with the name of Edward Bear). The name Pooh originally belonged to a swan, as can be seen in the introduction of Milne's 'When We Were Very Young'.
Pooh meets Tigger outside his house
A.A. Milne started to write a series of books about Winnie the Pooh, his son Christopher Robin, and their friends in the Hundred Acre Wood. These other characters, such as Eeyore, Piglet, Tigger, Kanga and Roo were also based on stuffed animals belonging to Christopher Robin. The characters, Rabbit and Owl, were based on animals that lived, like the swan Pooh, in the surrounding area of Milne's country home, Cotchford Farm in Ashdown Forest, Sussex. It is this area on which the 100-Acre-Wood was based.
'Winnie-the-Pooh' was published by Methuen on October 14th, 1926, the verses 'Now We are Six' in 1927, and 'The House at Pooh Corner' in 1928.(History of Winnie the Pooh)The Pooh-books had also been favourites of Walt Disney's daughters and it inspired Disney to bring Pooh to film in 1966.
Leave a comment:
-
Which pooh story I do not recall. All I remember is my mom making me watch this while she rubbed cream in her chest ( something about a pearl necklace). I just hope I never have tO see felicity covered in ..... ThisOriginally posted by MisterM View PostVery disturbing evidence. The honey seems to have more symbolic meanings here
. From which Poop story is the second picture, I haven't seen him before?
YiC, Miikkael
Stay away from poo!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
Very disturbing evidence. The honey seems to have more symbolic meanings hereOriginally posted by JustGotSaved View PostNO way is pooh good for kids!!!!
FELICITY--dont look!! Or if you DO look, do NOT understand!!
. From which Poop story is the second picture, I haven't seen him before?
YiC, Miikkael
Leave a comment:
-
-
Re: Is Winnie The Pooh really suitable for the Children?
When Walt Disney created this Winnie The Poop bear he clearly had the total destruction of our innocent children in mind. Also talking pigs and bears are a direct insult to God. Everyone knows only snakes and donkeys can talk, as is clearly explained in His Holy Bible!
The talking snake: Genesis 3:4-5 "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
The talking donkey: Numbers 22:28-29 "And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass, and she said unto Balaam, What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times? And Balaam said unto the ass, Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee."
And that's it! No other talking animals are mentioned in the Bible.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: