[Captain_Asshat]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

This is a thread about equality.

Hey, asstard! Who cares bout equality? What matters is keepin God happy, an bein like him an shit. Jus look at me, I wanna be as fat as God so he luv me mor than u.

Think of it this way, assface. I'm twice the size of u, dickhat! Ya know what that mean, huh?? It mean I eat twice as much as ya, I drink twice as much as ya, so I mus be twice as smart as ya!

Don't take no degree in burger-fixin' to see which one of us gunna go to Heaven!! I wonder if they hav Big Macs there?? Praise!





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

YOU TOO CAN BE FAT FOR JESUS !

Did you know that baby Jesus fed one big fat man with 500 loaves and 500 fishes?

In an attempt to re-create that miracle, I’m attempting to eat 500 loaves and 500 fishes in one sitting - for Charity! Yes, I hope to raise enough money to feed a starving African child on McDonalds burgers for 1 whole week! Glory!

… Go to www. LARD FOR THE LORD .com for more information ….

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

The only people who are inferior are those who think they're better than others.

So then you believe that all people are equal, even the retardeds? You are equal to a retarded?

You are also equal to an Olympic athlete?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

The only people who are inferior are those who think they're better than others.

Like joos and liebrals. Exactly.

[frothage]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

The only people who are inferior are those who think they're better than others.

[Warrior of God]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Possibly, Pastor Peter's motive for home-schooling are more to do with standards. Proper standards , that reflect achievemnt accurately.

You were very quick to boast of your straight A child and his problems as he becomes retarded.

However, have you thought about those A's...they are achieved in an environment of controlled mediocrity, where a diminshed return on input and reflected achievment is reagarded as the correct process.
Thus surely, and A awarded in such a sub-standard situation probably only equates to a D achieved in a situation where excellence is encouraged or demanded.
Perhaps you should remove your child from his inferior school so can you try to turn his disguised D's into real A's before he it is too late for him to catch up.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Another reason, of course, being so that you can beat and torture him without interference by "secular" police, eh?

You've got a lot of nerve, Bimbo Girl! We would never do anything of the sort to Little Ikey.

at least not given the current Republican definition of "torture"

[Bama_Girl]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Another reason, of course, being so that you can beat and torture him without interference by "secular" police, eh?

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Heck no. If I wanted to be politically correct I would tell you how piffleed up you are to believe we aren't all equal. But I know better. I don't say one race/religion/sexual preference or anything other large clump of people is any better than others, but I know damned good and well that we are NOT all "equal". To hell with political correctness. No way is my straight-A son "equal" to the dumb redhead kid in his class. Unfortunately, (vicious attack on our Divinely hand-picked President deleted), the rest of the class cannot move on and LEARN anything else because his retarded little brain can't seem to grasp the simplest of concepts on the first, or even the second or third try. Noooooo. Now the rest of the class has to sit around and wait for the little retarded brat to "learn" whatever it is before they can move on.
Equal? Hell no!!

That, dear Bonobo Girl, is one of the reasons why my grandson is being homeschooled.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Heck no. If I wanted to be politically correct I would tell you how piffleed up you are to believe we aren't all equal. But I know better. I don't say one race/religion/sexual preference or anything other large clump of people is any better than others, but I know damned good and well that we are NOT all "equal". To hell with political correctness. No way is my straight-A son "equal" to the dumb redhead kid in his class. Unfortunately, because of piffleing Bush's "no child left behind" crap, the rest of the class cannot move on and LEARN anything else because his retarded little brain can't seem to grasp the simplest of concepts on the first, or even the second or third try. Noooooo. Now the rest of the class has to sit around and wait for the little retarded brat to "learn" whatever it is before they can move on.
Equal? Hell no!!

Maybe your straight-A son can teach you about paragraph structure, eh?

Thank you for bringing up President Bush's masterpiece of equality, No Child Left Behind. As you can see from your experience as an awed parent, it's working wonders to ensure the complete and utter equality of the next generation. All children will graduate at exactly the same educational level, and none will have any advantage over any other. Isn't it wonderful?

[Bama_Girl]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Heck no. If I wanted to be politically correct I would tell you how fucked up you are to believe we aren't all equal. But I know better. I don't say one race/religion/sexual preference or anything other large clump of people is any better than others, but I know damned good and well that we are NOT all "equal". To hell with political correctness. No way is my straight-A son "equal" to the dumb redhead kid in his class. Unfortunately, because of fucking Bush's "no child left behind" crap, the rest of the class cannot move on and LEARN anything else because his retarded little brain can't seem to grasp the simplest of concepts on the first, or even the second or third try. Noooooo. Now the rest of the class has to sit around and wait for the little retarded brat to "learn" whatever it is before they can move on.
Equal? Hell no!!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

I wouldn't want to be considered "equal" to you people.
I am better than you. Period.

Then I assume you do not believe in the American public's myth of "equality"?

[Bama_Girl]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

I wouldn't want to be considered "equal" to you people.
I am better than you. Period.

[Pinecone]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

Equality? Doesn't exist.

Equality is only present in homagenous systems.

The day we are all truly the same is the day we are all equal.

[Pinecone]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

My "u" key didn't work on that first Jesus. Imagine my embarasment.

Is there a moderator that can possibly fix that?

Maybe add an "o" to pivotal...

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are we all "equal"?

As a point of order, Jess Christ did not die temporarily. His remnance in a state of death was a temporary affair, but to die is a singular event, the pivtal point between life and death.

Jesus Christ died, then rose from death, then ascended into heaven.

If you want to highlight the miracle of the ressurection, dimuning his death with a parenthetical remark afterwards is not a fitting tribute.

This is a thread about equality.