X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Once again I say; you are a complete fool. Radio carbon dating is junk, utterly discredited.

    The Christian genius Dr. Kent Hovind will explain it all to you here:

    Sorry but his comment means nothing, he doesn't prove anything, he's just blabbing away with some graphs and texts. He's correct in saying that Cabon 14 is formed into the upper layers of the atmoshpere by means of cosmic rays but forget's to mention that it easily bounds with oxygen and then forms carbon Dioxide which in turn is absorbed by water, that's why the planet never reaches an equilibrium because the quantities that actually do form into cabon 14 are extremely small.


    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    Click on the underlined "cephalaspis". That is the link.
    Yes, I saw it too late.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Click on the underlined "cephalaspis". That is the link.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by snottyduck View Post
    Carbon-14 dating was discovered in 1949 and has been also applied to date things of which they know how old they exactly are (like Egyptian mummies) so they know it's a constant decay, did you ever see any nuclear science?? If you had you would have known that radioactive elements have a constant decay. I'm aware that the carbon-14 method has a limit of use but there are dozens of other ways to date something. It's too complicated to go into detail of every method they utilize for dating, it's enough to say that there is a whole arsenal of ways to date something.

    And it's not water that made dinosaurs go into fossil state but rather the pressure of the earth layers, that's a process that takes millions of years btw.
    Once again I say; you are a complete fool. Radio carbon dating is junk, utterly discredited.

    The Christian genius Dr. Kent Hovind will explain it all to you here:

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Here’s a picture of Crossoloricaria cephalaspis. As you will see on the site, it was taken in 2007, which makes it a few years short of what the so-called scientists say.

    Doubtless, there are those who will say, “More Research!”; OK, here it is:
    INGREDIENTS:
    • 6 whole cephalaspis, cleaned (about 1 to 1 1/2 pounds each)
    • Basting Sauce:
    • 4 ounces butter, melted (1 stick)
    • 2/3 cup lemon juice
    • dash of Tabasco sauce
    • 1 teaspoon prepared mustard
    • 2 tablespoons Worcestershire sauce
    • 1 teaspoon salt
    • 1 teaspoon freshly ground pepper
    • 1 teaspoon chili powder

    PREPARATION:
    Whisk together basting sauce ingredients. Place cephalaspison well-oiled grill or grilling basket over medium coals. Grill, basting frequently for about 20 minutes; turn and continue grilling for about 15 minutes or until fish flakes easily with a fork.
    Serves 6.
    Last edited by Ezekiel Bathfire; 06-29-2008, 11:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    Really? It's a constant factor?

    So, you're saying that radiocarbon dating has been in use for thousands of years, so the exact decay rate is known as a fact?

    Here I thought it had been around for a few decades, and the decay rate was a mathematical extrapolation of a precious few years of recorded observations. There is nothing to say that the decay rate of carbon-14 is not higher or lower earlier in its lifespan.

    Well, nothing except your fowl antichristian arrogance.


    Incidentally, feathered fiend, how do you propose dating things older than 50,000 years (the theoretical maximum for carbon-14 dating, were it actually able to do what your scienticians claim it does)? Supposedly, dinosaurs are millions of years old.

    At my church, we teach the truth. Those dinosaurs were killed in the Great Flood and covered in mud. The incredible pressure from the water hastened their transformation into fossils.

    Carbon-14 dating was discovered in 1949 and has been also applied to date things of which they know how old they exactly are (like Egyptian mummies) so they know it's a constant decay, did you ever see any nuclear science?? If you had you would have known that radioactive elements have a constant decay. I'm aware that the carbon-14 method has a limit of use but there are dozens of other ways to date something. It's too complicated to go into detail of every method they utilize for dating, it's enough to say that there is a whole arsenal of ways to date something.

    And it's not water that made dinosaurs go into fossil state but rather the pressure of the earth layers, that's a process that takes millions of years btw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by snottyduck View Post
    Some methods like Carbon dating offers a more stable pattern because the decay rates of radioisotopes are a constant factor.
    Really? It's a constant factor?

    So, you're saying that radiocarbon dating has been in use for thousands of years, so the exact decay rate is known as a fact?

    Here I thought it had been around for a few decades, and the decay rate was a mathematical extrapolation of a precious few years of recorded observations. There is nothing to say that the decay rate of carbon-14 is not higher or lower earlier in its lifespan.

    Well, nothing except your fowl antichristian arrogance.


    Incidentally, feathered fiend, how do you propose dating things older than 50,000 years (the theoretical maximum for carbon-14 dating, were it actually able to do what your scienticians claim it does)? Supposedly, dinosaurs are millions of years old.

    At my church, we teach the truth. Those dinosaurs were killed in the Great Flood and covered in mud. The incredible pressure from the water hastened their transformation into fossils.

    Leave a comment:


  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Dr. Santiago Solo View Post
    Don't blame your ignorance in dear old PBR, he has more knowledge of science in his Bible-holding pinky that you in your whole gas masked-fetished head
    Well, he didn't have the facts straight in that post he wrote (but neither did I and I dare to admit that).

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Santiago Solo
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by snottyduck View Post
    You are right about that, I just copied Meiosis out of the post by Pastor Billy-Reuben because I assumed he got the terms right but it seems faulty. It must indeed be Mitosis as our dear Dr Santiago Solo pointed out. (That'll teach me not to copy out of texts next time)
    Don't blame your ignorance in dear old PBR, he has more knowledge of science in his Bible-holding pinky that you in your whole gas masked-fetished head

    Leave a comment:


  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Dr. Santiago Solo View Post
    Meiosis of bacteria??? Are you insane????? Bacteria reproduce asexually, hence they only divide through mitosis.
    You are right about that, I just copied Meiosis out of the post by Pastor Billy-Reuben because I assumed he got the terms right but it seems faulty. It must indeed be Mitosis as our dear Dr Santiago Solo pointed out. (That'll teach me not to copy out of texts next time)

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Santiago Solo
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by snottyduck View Post
    That very nice explained but also very theoretically and there is more to it than just math, Calculating the meiosis of bacteria is hardly worth anything because it's all related towards ecological differences. The rate of reproduction in bacteria is prone to temperature for instance, in colder climates it doesn't go that fast and some bacteria are a part of the foodchain (some bacteria even eat other bacteria). Calculation something on such a base is prone to fail because of the inconsistency of the model you use to calculate things like that. Some methods like Carbon dating offers a more stable pattern because the decay rates of radioisotopes are a constant factor.
    Meiosis of bacteria??? Are you insane????? Bacteria reproduce asexually, hence they only divide through mitosis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wide-Open
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    It makes total sense!

    God invented a fish. And then He waited 399,994,000.00 years to create water.

    Yup, that's it.

    Reality check anyone?

    Monkey worshippers believe just about EVERYTHING as long as it is an insult to Baby Jesus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Tell it to satan while he's anally raping you for all eternity in the pits of hell. You monkey worshipers will have alot to answer for when you appear in front of Jesus on Judgement day. You've worked so hard to turn people away from Christ that it makes Him weep.

    I'm glad I'm not you.
    You seem to spend an awful lot of time visualizing various kinds of rape - anal seems to be a favorite of yours. Why is that?

    Leave a comment:


  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Tell it to satan while he's anally raping you for all eternity in the pits of hell. You monkey worshipers will have alot to answer for when you appear in front of Jesus on Judgement day. You've worked so hard to turn people away from Christ that it makes Him weep.

    I'm glad I'm not you.

    What's the matter?? can't you handle a perfectly sound explanation?? That's the problem, you people launch a theory that earth is only 6,000 years old without any reasonable backup, the Bible does not provide any dates and thus it cannot be used to calculate how old this planet really is. It doesn't matter how old earth is, or if dinosaurs walked the planet before us. The reason why some people can't accept that there where animals and other life before the human race is just because of there own Ego, nothing more. Why would it matter, Dinosaurs where just animals, they didn't invent anything, they are just like the animals today only different in appearance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by snottyduck View Post
    That very nice explained but also very theoretically and there is more to it than just math, Calculating the meiosis of bacteria is hardly worth anything because it's all related towards ecological differences. The rate of reproduction in bacteria is prone to temperature for instance, in colder climates it doesn't go that fast and some bacteria are a part of the foodchain (some bacteria even eat other bacteria). Calculation something on such a base is prone to fail because of the inconsistency of the model you use to calculate things like that. Some methods like Carbon dating offers a more stable pattern because the decay rates of radioisotopes are a constant factor.
    Tell it to satan while he's anally raping you for all eternity in the pits of hell. You monkey worshipers will have alot to answer for when you appear in front of Jesus on Judgement day. You've worked so hard to turn people away from Christ that it makes Him weep.

    I'm glad I'm not you.

    Leave a comment:


  • snottyduck
    replied
    Re: Cephalaspis or Jesus? You Decide - A Poll!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Duck, you're a fool. The proof is in the Bible plain as day. Take a look at THIS thread, where the true age of the earth is explained clearly by our own Pastor Billy-Rueben.

    It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, than for a man to hear the song of fools.
    For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool: this also is vanity.
    Ecclesiastes 7:5-6
    That very nice explained but also very theoretically and there is more to it than just math, Calculating the meiosis of bacteria is hardly worth anything because it's all related towards ecological differences. The rate of reproduction in bacteria is prone to temperature for instance, in colder climates it doesn't go that fast and some bacteria are a part of the foodchain (some bacteria even eat other bacteria). Calculation something on such a base is prone to fail because of the inconsistency of the model you use to calculate things like that. Some methods like Carbon dating offers a more stable pattern because the decay rates of radioisotopes are a constant factor.

    Leave a comment:

Working...