Originally posted by lilith
View Post
'Cos she's a really fast runner?
-
Re: Why Liebrals Hate Marriage
Then she should have run to Jesus and a Godly marriage in Alabama by 14!! -
Re: Why Liebrals Hate Marriage
Well, much as I'm sickened by this latest example of lieberal Jewish media bias, I don't really see why that bit about including 16-year-olds is relevant. Why shouldn't a 16-year-old girl be married?Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View PostLeave a comment:
-
Re: Why Liebrals Hate Marriage
Thank you for that very intelligent bit of information, Brother Zeke. I know we women tend to have simple thoughts, but I had always assumed lieberals were homosexuals and closeted homers (like that ex-gay minister from the New Life Church in Colorado Springs . . . wasn't his name Ted Faggard?) Anyway, no matter what the false Christians and lieberal demons do, I'm sure Elmer and I will be together till the final round is spent!Attached FilesLeave a comment:
-
-
Why Liebrals Hate Marriage
The latest in a long line of Jew York Times editorials disguised as "news" stories was a recent article suggesting that most American women today do not have husbands. Partly this was based on census data - but much more so on creative definitions. By which I mean, they lied, as usual.
The liebrals at the Times defined "women" to include females as young as 16 and counted widows, who of course could not be widows unless they had once had a husband. Wives whose husbands were away in the military, or in prison, were also counted among women not living with a husband.
With such creative definitions, it turned out that 51 percent of "women" were not living with a husband. That made it "most" women and created a "news" story.
What was the point? To show that marriage is a thing of the past. To destroy marriage, one trumped-up story at a time.
Negative depictions of marriage and family are common not only in our newspapers but also wherever the left is concentrated, whether in secular schools and colleges or on television or in the movies of hellywood.
The Jew York Times was not the first outlet of the left to play fast and loose with statistics in order to depict marriage as a relic of the past. Innumerable sources have quoted a statistic that half of all marriages end in divorce - another conclusion based on creative manipulation of words, rather than on hard facts.
The fact that there may be half as many divorces in a given year as there are marriages in that year does not mean that half of all marriages end in divorce.
It is completely misleading to compare all the divorces in one year - from marriages begun years and even decades earlier - with the number of marriages begun in that one year.
Why these desperate twistings of words and numbers by the left in order to discredit marriage? Partly it is because marriage is a fundamental component of God's order that the left opposes. Moreover, marriage represents social restrictions on individual free choice and a perceived chink in the armor of Jesus.
Marriage and family are also barriers to the left's desire to create a society built to their own specifications. Those specifications include allowing sodomites to marry each other, legalized pornography, mandatory abortions, bestiality and the complete dissolution of the family unit.
In one way or another, however, the left has for more than two centuries tried to undermine families - including today redefining the words "marriage" and "family" to include whatever kind of perverts want to live together in whatever way for whatever reason.
If "marriage" can mean anything, then it means nothing. That is why Jesus MUST prevail in 2008. He will guide us to the right, White male GOP candidate. It is vital that we listen carefully and follow His direction, now more than ever.
Leave a comment: