Melania's Tradwife Image Needs a Little Improvement

[Johny Joe Hold]

I have to admit Melania has done well helping the President look good. When they appear together one can see he scored with a trophy wife.

I have some reservations, however, about Melania's publicity team. She has several White House employees working in her office but she herself has hardly been seen for some months. It seems to me she needs to invite the press into her kitchen while she bakes a pie. Or, maybe she could darn a hole in one of Barron's socks. It would be wonderful to see Melania and the President walking into church together. Anyone who knows a channel that can reach would be doing all of us a favor to pass this along.

My month in the tradwife world: ‘I can’t pretend I’m not enjoying myself at all ...’ | Women | The Guardian

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Women sell their feminine assets which are beauty and child-rearing. Men with masculine assets, such private islands and extreme sexual performance ability, purchase them. Duh, 2+2=4.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Women sell their feminine assets which are beauty and child-rearing. Men with masculine assets, such private islands and extreme sexual performance ability, purchase them. Duh, 2+2=4.

I'm thinking the women's group here at Landover Baptist could gift Melania an apron. I've never seen her wear one.

[MitzaLizalor]

That is a lovely idea. Can I suggest a fabric apron or pinafore (which ties all the way ’round from the waistline and may be longer) rather than one of those vinyl things? There are connotations, especially with the darker (black)(maroon) tones, perhaps better avoided. Christians have no interest in eroticism but next-door things could be otherwise, especially if she were gathering herbs outdoors.

I don’t have heaps in common with your stereotypical tradwife – I work full-time, I’m married to a woman and I’m about to enter my 30s without having had a child (unless you count my . . . cat)

I didn't read much past that but noticed some very suspicious clothing choices. Probably chosen by The Guardian and one of them was a mormon. A greater threat, however, lies in the so-called "equality" movement. Activists go on about equalities of opportunity, of employment, of going out to nightclubs or of hanging around bars: very feeble. And as a result, given that a population—of 100, say—requires only so much work to be done, such as making roads, growing potatoes, building houses and so on, employment opportunities are actually reduced!

Fifty of the hundred managed that very well, starting from Julius Caesar might as well he built a lot of roads and stuff, and things went swimmingly for eighteen centuries. Then someone invented The Novel, a form of literature dealing with issues. Nothing was off-limits; some authors were taken to court but prevailed and their ideas were disseminated widely. Another century or two and those ideas were implemented. Among the hundred, still only the same number of roads were required, houses, potatoes BUT now all one hundred expected employment opportunities. The outcome is obvious—was obvious at the time—that $ per person employed must necessarily halve. Same amount of work. Same number of potatoes. Twice as many people producing them. It gets worse.

Forget doubling the number of potatoes (who'd buy them?) the salient point is: who cares for the next generation as babies? Now creatures of The Guardian, a notorious commie rag, will celebrate new employment opportunities! Cleaners, to sweep the floor; sandwich makers, to prepare the evening meal; childminders, to care for the babies. All funded by household incomes now REQUIRING double incomes because everyone is earning half as much. (There's still only the same amount of work needs doing.)

And here we see such a good example, a wife not being a bus driver but attending to her affairs just as was the case when Julius Caesar built an empire on an equally solid base. I call it "equality of reality" but then I am not a Guardian reader.

Thank you Jesus.