[Didymus Much]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

that would be an option if youtube wasn't my only way to watch mlp episodes

By violation of copyright laws.

If a God-fearing Christian wanted to watch MLP (just exactly why, we won't get into here), he'd get himself a job and subscribe to the network package offered by his cable or satellite provider that includes the channel that MLP is broadcast on in his/her local area.

Never mind the ridiculousness of being forced to pay for thousands of hours of other programming that you'd never even think of watching being tacked onto that package for no other reason because the bean counters have determined that their customers are such meek little sheep that they'll take tranche "B" (for example) because it has the one show that they want to watch, buried as it might be, like the MotoGP broadcasts on TSN (so conveniently scheduled at 4:45AM on Tuesday) that Cogeco was nice enough to only offer in a package that also included 12 cooking channels, 14 home shopping outlets, and the Wetaskiwin-Penetanguishene local high school football channel.

Why? Because it's the law (and multinational conglomerates can afford more lawyers than you, so what they say is the law is actually the law), and Christians are commanded by God to obey the law.

So you're not a Christian.

Why do you enjoy injecting marijuana in your furry butt?

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

That'd be the one on your end, as the vBulletin software does not allow Landover to have a bespoke one for this specific site.

Unfortunately, that means your computer is hopelessly infested with demons. You'll have to give it away (to an atheist, of course, don't want to pass demons on to a good, God-fearing Christian) and stay off the internet forever.

that would be an option if youtube wasn't my only way to watch mlp episodes

[Didymus Much]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

...also the spell checker needs an update it just redlined me for typing in the word christ.

That'd be the one on your end, as the vBulletin software does not allow Landover to have a bespoke one for this specific site.

Unfortunately, that means your computer is hopelessly infested with demons. You'll have to give it away (to an atheist, of course, don't want to pass demons on to a good, God-fearing Christian) and stay off the internet forever.

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

Are you a retarded? Are you capable of reading? It says "If though buy an Hebrew servant", not "If thou buy the servant of a Hebrew". Does your caregiver know you're on the Internet?

so let me get this straight your saying that the fact that jews could keep each other as slaves justifies racial slavery, even though that demonstrates slavery knew no gender or race, hebrews, the chosen people of God, were just as likely to become slaves as a pagan. which means if your interpretation is right and God does condone slavery along racial lines, we're all meant to be slaves. which in reality we are, but to Christ not each other. also the spell checker needs an update it just redlined me for typing in the word christ.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

oh wait i read that wrong, that ones talking about a jewish slave owning a jewish slave

Ah, so you are capable of reading! You posted this while I was praying (as I always do before I click Submit Reply), so I didn't see this before my last reply.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

that post has nothing to do with race, if a servant of a hebrew serves 6 years he's released if he so wishes. and also cranky old man the bible doesn't condone selling slaves, that passage is talking about a human king dealing with his own slaves, it's not saying you should strive to own them, and its not saying slavery its wrong, it's just using a social situation to illustrate the concept of forgiveness.

Are you a retarded? Are you capable of reading? It says "If though buy an Hebrew servant", not "If thou buy the servant of a Hebrew". Does your caregiver know you're on the Internet?

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

that post has nothing to do with race, if a servant of a hebrew serves 6 years he's released if he so wishes. and also cranky old man the bible doesn't condone selling slaves, that passage is talking about a human king dealing with his own slaves, it's not saying you should strive to own them, and its not saying slavery its wrong, it's just using a social situation to illustrate the concept of forgiveness.

oh wait i read that wrong, that ones talking about a jewish slave owning a jewish slave

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

Explain Exodus 21:2 then. "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing." Seems to me there's a racial component there. Did you even read the scripture before you started spouting off? All your posts on this subject so far have been so riddled with errors I have to question if you've even read the Bible or at least the first post in this thread. Did you see the thread title and feel your liberal anger so enraged that you came storming in to post without looking to see if any of your nonsense has already been rebutted?

that post has nothing to do with race, if a servant of a hebrew serves 6 years he's released if he so wishes. and also cranky old man the bible doesn't condone selling slaves, that passage is talking about a human king dealing with his own slaves, it's not saying you should strive to own them, and its not saying slavery its wrong, it's just using a social situation to illustrate the concept of forgiveness.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

no it isn't and frankly according to the kind of slavery the bible was talking about you or I would be as liable for slavery as anyone because biblical slavery is non-racial based

Explain Exodus 21:2 then. "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing." Seems to me there's a racial component there. Did you even read the scripture before you started spouting off? All your posts on this subject so far have been so riddled with errors I have to question if you've even read the Bible or at least the first post in this thread. Did you see the thread title and feel your liberal anger so enraged that you came storming in to post without looking to see if any of your nonsense has already been rebutted?

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

that passage is talking about a human king who owns a slave, and forgave him and didn't sell him. so explain to me in what way God is saying to them "i encourage you to own slaves"

You're changing the subject. A trick I am going to ignore.

Just look at your own flawed logic for a second. If the Bible tells us to sell slaves, how can it not condone buying slaves? How can you sell something if no one is buying it?

According to your flawed logic allowing sales of cocaine would be fine since promoting the sales of cocaine has nothing to do whatsoever with people buying it.

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

You are, as usual, mistaken. Slavery is the Biblical solution for people refusing to pay their bills.

Matthew 18:25
King James Version (KJV)

25 But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.


Case closed.

that passage is talking about a human king who owns a slave, and forgave him and didn't sell him. so explain to me in what way God is saying to them "i encourage you to own slaves"

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

no it isn't

Let me see if I understand.

You're suggesting the Holy Bible doesn't condone slavery even though it condones the "proper" application of slavery?

How does that work, dear?

and frankly according to the kind of slavery the bible was talking about you or I would be as liable for slavery as anyone because biblical slavery is non-racial based

You've never actually read the Holy Bible, have you?

Spoilers: Race counts.

and nobody has the right to own a slave even if slavery especially racial slavery weren't a grievous violation of human rights they would be a serious luxury

More spoiliers: Nobody has any rights except what the gives them (Romans 9:20-23). Some have the right to personal freedom. Some don't. And it's okay, because in the end, everyone has the option to freely choose to accept the conditional saving grace of , or burn forever (Revelation 20:15).

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

dude don't the bible may not ever explicitly ban slavery but it never condones it either

You are, as usual, mistaken. Slavery is the Biblical solution for people refusing to pay their bills.

Matthew 18:25
King James Version (KJV)

25 But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.


Case closed.

[dudemon223]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

"I don't condone slavery, but here's how to treat them!" Providing a code of conduct IS condoning!

no it isn't and frankly according to the kind of slavery the bible was talking about you or I would be as liable for slavery as anyone because biblical slavery is non-racial based

and nobody has the right to own a slave even if slavery especially racial slavery weren't a grievous violation of human rights they would be a serious luxury

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: BRING BACK SLAVERY!!!

dude don't the bible may not ever explicitly ban slavery but it never condones it either, in fact it's only statement on slavery is a code of conduct for the slave, a code of conduct for the master, a bill or rights for the slave, and stating that all slaves that choose to be must be freed every 7 years and every 50th year

"I don't condone slavery, but here's how to treat them!" Providing a code of conduct IS condoning!