X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by John Creeser View Post
    And Osama Obama isn't? He's so doped up he needs a teleprompter to read from everywhere he goes..or he just stands there and smiles.
    Please Brother, we're talking about successful people like Limbaugh and President Bush. Of course B HUSSIEN Obama is stoned like Muslim he really is.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Creeser
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    Why are you trying to derail this topic? I just stated that he too was on medication.
    And Osama Obama isn't? He's so doped up he needs a teleprompter to read from everywhere he goes..or he just stands there and smiles.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by BelieverInGod View Post
    Don't you have a ship to plunder or something?
    Nope I'm not busy just at the moment, It is a Holiday after all.

    Leave a comment:


  • BelieverInGod
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    As I said....
    I was asking if it that qualified him for a an asterisk, he had pharmaceutical assistance as did, Rush Limbaugh and Joese Canseco.
    Don't you have a ship to plunder or something?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    I see, and I bet you would like the blame the Obama recession on Bush to?
    Why are you trying to derail this topic? I just stated that he too was on medication.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    As I said....
    I was asking if it that qualified him for a an asterisk, he had pharmaceutical assistance as did, Rush Limbaugh and Joese Canseco.
    I see, and I bet you would like the blame the Obama recession on Bush to?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    As I said....
    I was asking if it that qualified him for a an asterisk, he had pharmaceutical assistance as did, Rush Limbaugh and Joese Canseco.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    The prescription drugs, administered by Col. Richard J. Tubb, the White House physician, can impair the President’s mental faculties and decrease both his physical capabilities and his ability to respond to a crisis, administration aides admit privately.

    Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports as anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid meglomaniac” and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad” showcase Bush’s instabilities.

    But we are going off topic here, I was asking it that qualified him for a an asterisk.
    So you think just because Bush was so persecuted by the Liberal Main Stream Media for his successes he was left no choice by to resort to medical aid, under doctors orders, he should be labeled a drug user? NO of course not!
    The man had Muslim TERRORISTS to face! This isn't like some losers the Empire of Japan in the 1940s, these were stone cold killers determined to die crashing their airplanes into Americans.

    As certian as Ronald Regan the Maximus is our first president and defeated communism GW Bush is our of Greatest President EVER(r). Nothing can detract from that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Do you have some proof of this accusation against the Greatest President Ever®?
    The prescription drugs, administered by Col. Richard J. Tubb, the White House physician, can impair the President’s mental faculties and decrease both his physical capabilities and his ability to respond to a crisis, administration aides admit privately.

    Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports as anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid meglomaniac” and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad” showcase Bush’s instabilities.

    But we are going off topic here, I was asking it that qualified him for a an asterisk.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by BelieverInGod View Post
    Well considering something like 25% of the population takes anti-depressants, I doubt it. Have you considered giving it a try?
    Anti-depressant use went up by 75% from 1996 to 2005, 5.84 percent of the population to 10.12 percent. Over the same period there was a marked increase in the percentage of this spending that was devoted to direct-to consumer advertising, from 3.3 percent ($32 million) to 12 percent ($122.00 million). So I think 25% is still a High estimate. Also people being treated for such conditions tend not to be the Commander in Chef of a Nuclear power.

    I don't have any problem with depression or paranoia, no erratic behaviour, nor is there any family history of such conditions. so I think I will give them a Ms BIG.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    While in office George W. Bush was taking powerful anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behaviour, depression and paranoia. Does he get a star too?
    Do you have some proof of this accusation against the Greatest President Ever(r)?

    Leave a comment:


  • BelieverInGod
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    While in office George W. Bush was taking powerful anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behaviour, depression and paranoia. Does he get a star too?
    Well considering something like 25% of the population takes anti-depressants, I doubt it. Have you considered giving it a try?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    While in office George W. Bush was taking powerful anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behaviour, depression and paranoia. Does he get a star too?

    Leave a comment:


  • BelieverInGod
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    Hmm..... seems I'm out numbered. I did vote that it's a performance enhancing drug. I think it stops him from caring what his ratings, or the liebrals think of him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: Should Rush Limbaugh get the asterisk?

    I believe this is the second time Brother Rush has been accused of being addicted to drugs.

    Both times, there were perfectly good excuses. These were that the pain was too great and he did not like to go to liberal doctors for treatment. He medicated himself.

    This proves that his drug use is a nonissue.

    Leave a comment:

Working...