X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wait_what
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    The point, the thing you have totally missed here, that Scott Randolph was making is that the GOP gives more respect, privileges and legal rights to "faceless corporations that will rule your life" then it does to people.
    And demoncrats give more rights to terrorists, Obama administration gave citizenship to 2 convicted terrorists, than they do to the unborn child of a law abiding citizen.

    When you vote Demoncrat, this is what you are voting for:

    Implementation of Sharia law
    Loss of jobs
    Racism
    Baby Killing
    Terrorist Harboring (Did you know that in an early morning session in which Republicans were told last minute about, Obama signed in an addendum to a bill granting Asylum to Hamas fighters?)
    Polarization of the people
    Abuse of Personal and Civil Rights (Which POTUS has used, abused, and expanded the "powers" of the Patriot Act? Which one was behind an ammendment to the intial knee jerk act, limiting government power?)
    Spitting on The Constitution (Obama issued a decree a few weeks ago that allows him to hold indefinitely any person, citizen or not, even after they have been found NOT GUILTY by a jury of their peers.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Free Market Fred
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Twiggy View Post
    No silly, a uterus is PART of a woman!
    Didn't you study that in school?
    Sister Twiggy, sounds to me like you went to one of those commie public schools where they teach the sex education hoax, along with the evolution hoax and the global warming hoax. I'm sorry that at a young, tender age, you were forced to believe in the uterus myth and all that other so-called "science." Back then, liberals were in charge of the educational system, but fortunately that's all changed.

    I want to make it clear that good Christians have a duty to home-school their kids. If the parents don't have time, they can always handcuff the kids to a port-a-potty in front of the TV and set the dial on one of the Christian stations. Just leave some dogfood and water within reach, and you can disappear for a few days without worry. If the brats start acting out, a little bit of Prozac mixed with the dogfood should calm them down.

    Don't worry about your kids not learning how to read. Reading is dangerous, and can cause your kids to become gay. We are lucky to live in an age when modern technology has made books and newspapers obsolete - my company sells all the important educational materials as "audio books," so they can listen to the Bible, the Left-Behind series or Atlas Shrugged on an iPod or DVD player. We even sell a "smart chair" which wakes the brats up with a mild electric shock, lest they fall asleep during their important lessons from Glenn Beck University.


    Teach your kids to love Jesus, or else!

    And best of all, in conservative states like Texas where they privatized schooling, you can get vouchers to pay for all the teaching equipment. Really, educating kids has never been easier, or more profitable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Twiggy
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Seth Campbell View Post
    So now a uterus is the same as a person? Really? Is that all you think of your wenches as? You liebral scum are always talking a good game about "respecting women" but then you come out with stuff like this.
    No silly, a uterus is PART of a woman!
    Didn't you study that in school?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Go for it Sisters!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Seth Campbell View Post
    So now a uterus is the same as a person? Really? Is that all you think of your wenches as? You liebral scum are always talking a good game about "respecting women" but then you come out with stuff like this.
    Is the whole point of this such a difficult concept for you to grasp?

    Let me try and spell it out yet again and we shall see if you mind can understand it.

    The GOP show more respect to companies then to a person, the only way that the GOP would respect a woman's rights over her own body would be if she was to make part of it a company.

    Some how I think this is still going to go way over your head Seth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Seth Campbell
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    The point, the thing you have totally missed here, that Scott Randolph was making is that the GOP gives more respect, privileges and legal rights to "faceless corporations that will rule your life" then it does to people.
    So now a uterus is the same as a person? Really? Is that all you think of your wenches as? You liebral scum are always talking a good game about "respecting women" but then you come out with stuff like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Seth Campbell View Post
    Your depth of perversion sickens me. Now you don't even see women as living beings you want them to be nothing but faceless corporations that will rule your life.

    Been keel-hauled once too often there pasta boy?
    The point, the thing you have totally missed here, that Scott Randolph was making is that the GOP gives more respect, privileges and legal rights to "faceless corporations that will rule your life" then it does to people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Seth Campbell
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    Such a misogynistic standpoint would not be benefited by incorporation, in fact if such a ridiculous case did not get laughed out of court the incorporated uterus would be able to avoid having to pay out much more easily then an individual.

    That after-all is part of the point that Scott Randolph was making.
    Your depth of perversion sickens me. Now you don't even see women as living beings you want them to be nothing but faceless corporations that will rule your life.

    Been keel-hauled once too often there pasta boy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Free Market Fred
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Well, I think I'm in a good position to know about this uterus stuff. My company's has a thriving business in human organ transplants. We work closely with government prison officials in China. Thus, we can almost always find a suitable organ donor for our clients. We've tried to introduce this same public-private partnership in combined prisons/hospitals in America, but them damn liberals kicked up a fuss. Fortunately, with the trend towards privatized prisons, we expect to solve that problem soon enough.


    In China, we even sell
    these at 7-Eleven


    Anyway, I just want to say that we have never had a request for a uterus transplant. Heart, kidneys, livers and eyeballs - yes, these are all marketable items. But a uterus? Absolutely not! It's a totally worthless thing. So it's not surprising that those libtards want to incorporate it. LOL!

    Jeeesh, them dumb lefties just don't understand business.

    Leave a comment:


  • wait_what
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    Because it is suitable for work, women and children.
    Maybe for your heathen work, women, and children. There is no hope for you or the people around you though. Good luck. I hope one of them can find the truth and escape the Hell you have condemned them to by not acknowledging your pornography and propaganda for what it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Benedict A. Davis View Post
    Why is there no NSFW, or preamble to keep children and women from looking at this thread. I am disgusted by your actions in this matter!
    Because it is suitable for work, women and children.

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Why is there no NSFW, or preamble to keep children and women from looking at this thread. I am disgusted by your actions in this matter!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    That after-all is part of the point that Scott Randolph was making.
    .
    Originally posted by Representative Scott Randolph
    The point is that Republicans are always talking about deregulation and big government. But I say their philosophy is small government for the big guy and big government for the little guy. And so, if my wife's uterus was incorporated or my friend's bedroom was incorporated, maybe the Republicans would be talking about deregulating.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    Such a misogynistic standpoint would not be benefited by incorporation, in fact if such a ridiculous case did not get laughed out of court the incorporated uterus would be able to avoid having to pay out much more easily then an individual.

    That after-all is part of the point that Scott Randolph was making.
    Why don't you and your gay lover Scott Randolf go sodomize a plate of spaghetti?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Incorporate Your Uterus?

    Originally posted by Schibbolet View Post
    If a mans wife would "incorporate" her uterus would that not mean that he would be able to sue her if she don't provide him with lots of small Christian soldiers? The purpose of a uterus is to serve as a place where women grow babies for their husband is it not? So being childless would be a breach of contract if she is "incorporated".

    Genesis 3:16
    Such a misogynistic standpoint would not be benefited by incorporation, in fact if such a ridiculous case did not get laughed out of court the incorporated uterus would be able to avoid having to pay out much more easily then an individual.

    That after-all is part of the point that Scott Randolph was making.

    Leave a comment:

Working...