[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Do YOU have any proof that everything in the bible IS right?

Are you too stupid or too lazy to read everything I have already provided?

http://www.allabouttruth.org/how-do-we-know-the-bible-is-true-faq.htm

How Do We Know the Bible is True?

How do we know the Bible is true? This is a simple, but profound question. The Bible uses different types of literary forms to speak about relationship between either man and man or God and man. In the Bible, we find history, poetry, parables, and narrative. Are these fact or fiction? Even though all Scripture is inspired, it should be read according to its genre. "The Bible is a truly human document with history, context, and style."1

Jesus used parables to try to reveal a difficult or elusive truth. He used many figures of speech and imagery to bring about understanding to His hearers. He used imagery such as the way (the road), the vine and the branches, and the sheep and the shepherd to help His hearers understand His relationship with His followers.

Archaeology and secular historical records have been invaluable in substantiating the historical information found in the Bible. As we read the poetry in the Psalms and the practical advice found in Proverbs, it rings true in our own human experience.

How do we know the Bible is true? The Bible is God's revelation. "It is revelation because inspiration is that activity and influence by God upon the Scripture writers such that what they wrote was genuinely the Word of God, preserving the divine revelation."2

"'The Bible, when correctly interpreted in light of the level to which culture and the means of communication had developed at the time it was written, and in view of the purposes for which it was given, is fully faithful in all that it affirms' (Erickson, 233-34)."3

How do we know the Bible is true? It has influenced countless numbers of people over time to live and die with their highest aim being that of pleasing their Lord and being found faithful in His sight.

Keep Studying Is the Bible True!

[horusonur]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

You can't help yourself from going after balls? That is more than I needed to know, you pervert.

Oh you do? Which books? Please, let me know. And make sure they are only books that you have read - otherwise how can you know they are trustworthy? And what are the arguments they make?

I'm waiting.

You can't help yourself from going after balls? That is more than I needed to know, you pervert.

Oh you do? Which books? Please, let me know. And make sure they are only books that you have read - otherwise how can you know they are trustworthy? And what are the arguments they make?

I'm waiting.

http://www.amazon.com/God-Failed-Hypothesis-Science-Shows/dp/1591024811

knock yourself out...

This is without a doubt the book that explains it all, and yes i have read it, cause i read much. And you'll maybe be like: " No he does not! He just babbles back and forth of something he knows nothing about!!" but i actually do.

But you are just to arrogant to look at other peoples explanations.


And srsly....this will be my last post since i am going away x'D
But keep on whining Two camels in a tiny car..

[Kindinn]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

I just showed you quite a lot of proof, and you ignored it. I guess you were too lazy or stupid to read it. In my opinion, saying something is not true is hating and mocking it.

I know the bible is really I mean I can write things down too but is it true !?!?! You can't proof that?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Sorry Greeks, and no I find harry potter Boring. Well i know alot of History and can you pleas stop calling it a fairy tale, it's not you know? And i'm seeing this list for the first time now so No i'm not ignoring it because i'm a fraid or stupid.

According to Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_tale

Fairy tale is an English language term for a type of short narrative corresponding to the German term Maerchen, the Swedish saga, or the Italian fiaba.

Nice try, liar.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Oh balls, i just can't help myself....

Son you need to REPENT and do it now! Homersexurals will go to HELL

Lev.18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Lev.20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Rom.1:26-27 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

[Kindinn]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

According to Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_tale

Nice try, liar.

In our storys WHIC is saga in icelandic (Story=saga) It says that the thins written in the Books are really!!! we've found ruins and Graves just by following the books !

[GOD=life]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

But you are just to arrogant to look at other peoples explanations.

And srsly....this will be my last post since i am going away x'D But keep on whining

Okay, so:

• Not considering other people's views is wrong... agreed
• You announce that you will not read any responses... hey, but that's wrong!
• You call us whiners... again, wrong: you have to consider our views

So according to your own logic, you are a failure

[Kindinn]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Swedish and Icelandic is a little bit different.

Saga means Story
Ævintíri means Fairy tale

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

http://www.amazon.com/God-Failed-Hyp.../dp/1591024811



knock yourself out...

This is without a doubt the book that explains it all, and yes i have read it, cause i read much. And you'll maybe be like: " No he does not! He just babbles back and forth of something he knows nothing about!!" but i actually do.

But you are just to arrogant to look at other peoples explanations.


And srsly....this will be my last post since i am going away x'D
But keep on whining Two camels in a tiny car..

Is that the best you've got? That book has been refuted time and again:

http://dmitrychernikov.com/blog/2007/03/06/victor-stenger-imposes-a-convention-on-science/

Victor Stenger Imposes a “Convention” on Science

Here is how our author defines the different versions of naturalism:

The self-imposed convention of science that limits inquiry to objective observations of the world and generally seeks natural accounts for all phenomena is called methodological naturalism. We have also noted that methodological naturalism is often conflated with metaphysical naturalism, which assumes that reality itself is purely natural, that is, composed solely of material objects.
Methodological naturalism can still be applied without implying any dogmatic attachment to metaphysical naturalism. (God: The Failed Hypothesis, 29)

Stenger writes that he will “use the words natural and supernatural as synonymous with material and nonmaterial.” (14) This is rather confusing. If metaphysical naturalism is equivalent to materialism, then it suffers from all the problems identified with materialism. But if, say, substance dualism is true, are not animal souls entirely “natural”? Are human actions guided by intelligence supernatural? What of the immaterial numbers and sets and propositions and possible worlds and so on? Must we delete them from our ontology simply because we are committed to materialism? Is every “special science” merely applied physics? Are praxeology and economics not legitimate sciences? Clearly, materialism, apart from other unlovely things about it, inevitably leads to the most crude form of scientism, that is, the view that the correct methodology of every science must imitate the methodology of physics. I don’t know why Stenger would want to import materialism, with all its liabilities, into his unsuccessful search for God.
Suppose now that metaphysical naturalism is false. Should we nonetheless still abide by methodological naturalism? But why? If there are immaterial entities both immanent and beyond this universe, why must we deny them all causal efficacy? Who imposed this rule on what we can and cannot do in science? Should we not go where the evidence leads us? If our investigation leads us to postulate a designing intelligence, then shouldn’t we do just that? Stenger agrees with this position; his point is that the “hypothesis” of the existence of God is falsifiable and, in fact, falsified. This is a welcome change from the views of those atheists who refuse to countenance the idea that nature can, at least in principle, yield insights about God.

Try harder next time, k?

[James Dewitt]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

In our storys WHIC is saga in icelandic (Story=saga) It says that the thins written in the Books are really!!! we've found ruins and Graves just by following the books !

So what you are saying is that you need ruins to prove the Bible is real. Have you ever looked at a map and seen Jerusalem, Egypt. Have you some how missed them in History class. Try reading the Bible many of the places found in its teachings are still here today!

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

I know the bible is really I mean I can write things down too but is it true !?!?! You can't proof that?

Man alive, you are ignorant! Haven't I just showed you mountains of proofs in support of the Bible? Are you possessed by a retard demon?

http://www.faithfacts.org/search-for-truth/questions-of-christians/how-do-you-know-that-the-bible-is-true

How do you know that the Bible is true? Isn't it just a bunch of fables?

From many years of study, we have become convinced that the Bible is true and trustworthy—and that the skeptics are incorrect in their challenges. There are many evidences that confirm that the Bible is reliable. First, history and archeology confirm the biblical record. Over 25,000 sites have now been discovered that pertain to the Bible. As Nelson Glueck, renowned Jewish archaeologist said, "It may be stated categorically that no archeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference." Even though archeology does not prove spiritual truth, archeological confirmation is an amazing testimony to the accuracy of the Bible.
As a comparison, the religion of Mormonism makes many claims as to history, especially about the Americas. Yet none of its claims have been or can be verified by archeology, seriously damaging its credibility.
Another fascinating and unique aspect of Christianity is the accuracy of biblical prophecy. There are over 2,000 accurately fulfilled predictions in the Bible including some 300 specific details and implications about the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. For example, Isaiah 53 beautifully describes the life of Christ 700 years before it took place! Even the town of Jesus' birth was foretold in the Old Testament (Micah 5:2). And there are no prophetic failures.
The Bible contains page after page of history written in advance. The skeptic must come to grips with this evidence.
Concerning the New Testament, it is helpful to appreciate that all of the New Testament writers were of the generation of Jesus. Each writer was either an eyewitness to Jesus or was an interviewer of eyewitnesses. Three of the writers were Jesus' disciples—Matthew, John, and Peter.
Another key fact is the manuscript evidence itself. Recognizing that there are no known original manuscripts in existence for the Bible or for any other ancient writing, let's examine the Bible. For the New Testament, there are over 24,000 handwritten copies or portions thereof from antiquity now extant. This is far more than other ancient books. For example, the second most available ancient manuscripts are from Homer's Iliad, for which there are 643 manuscript copies, while most ancient documents have fewer than 25 existing copies.
Important is the time interval between the actual events, the date of writing, and the earliest known manuscript copy. For the Bible, manuscript copies or portions thereof exist that were written within 35 to 160 years after the originals. Recent dating of one manuscript of a portion of the Gospel of Matthew (the so-called Magdalen text) suggests that it was written in about A.D. 50—a mere 17 years after the crucifixion of Christ. If these findings hold up, it means that the Gospel of Mark, which predates the Matthew Gospel, was written as early as A.D. 40—only seven years or so after the crucifixion.
The interval between the historical events and the written evidence is far better for the New Testament than any other ancient manuscript. For example, the first account of Buddha's life was written 700 years after his death. The earliest copy of Caesar's works is 950 years after being written, and the earliest available copy of Plato's works is dated 1250 years after the original. Yet we do not question the authority of these other works!
Even more impressive is the degree of textual variance in existing copies. Considering the enormous number of ancient New Testament manuscripts, there are only nominal differences in the various copies. The data for the New Testament is impressive. Only 40 lines, or one fifth of one per cent are in question, and none of these variants effect Christian doctrine. This compares to large textual variances in other ancient writings. For example, the New Testament is 25 times more accurately copied than the Iliad, which was also "sacred" and is considered one of the best copied works of antiquity.
The large number of preserved copies without disagreements in content increases the chances that the Bible we have has preserved the original texts unmarred by heretical additions. The books of the New Testament were widely circulated among the earliest Christians, and could not have been corrupted without a great outcry on the part of orthodox Christians.
Further support for the Bible comes from the fact that events of the New Testament are supported by writings outside the Bible. Corroboration is available from several secular and Jewish historians of antiquity. (Examples: Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, Epictetus, Lucian, Aristides, Josephus, etc.)
Another interesting thing is the thousands of quotations found in writings of the early Church Fathers (A.D. 100-450). Even if all the New Testament manuscripts disappeared, it would still be possible to reconstruct almost the entire New Testament with quotes from the Church Fathers.
Thus, in his book, The Bible and Archaeology, Sir Frederic G. Kenyon, former director and principal librarian of the British Museum, stated about the New Testament: "The interval, then, between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact, negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed. Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established."
In addition to its being externally verified, significant further evidence of its reliability is the internally consistent nature of the Bible. It is truly an amazingly consistent document. The messages of approximately 40 different writers of the 66 books of the Bible, written over 1,500 years, in three different languages, all fit together like the pieces of a giant jigsaw puzzle. There is one continual theme throughout—God's plan of salvation from sin won for the whole world by the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This consistency itself attests to the miracle of this book.
Its mere endurance speaks for itself. For thousands of years people have explored every nook and cranny of the Bible. Alleged difficulties have been systematically answered. Upon examination, there are no errors or contradictions in the Bible. (A good reference is When Critics Ask, A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties, by Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe.)
Moreover, part of the testimony of the Bible's power and truth is the evidence of changed history and changed human lives. We might add that people come to believe the Bible freely without compulsion. Compare this to the religion of Islam, which has been spread by the force of the sword and political might.
The Bible has answers for today's problems. The relevance of biblical truths becomes evident to those who study it. People become convicted and changed.
The more one studies without bias the teachings found in the Bible, the more he or she will see that they conform to the truths of experience and human nature. It is just as powerful to the lives of people today as to those thousands of years ago.
The Bible has proven to be trustworthy, powerful, and significant. See also our article MAPS.
Here is a link to another site that has some helpful articles about the Bible and its history: Bible History.
A related question is, "Does the Bible Apply to Me Today?" Check out this link about how to interpret the Bible: Hermeneutics

[Kindinn]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

So what you are saying is that you need ruins to prove the Bible is real. Have you ever looked at a map and seen Jerusalem, Egypt. Have you some how missed them in History class. Try reading the Bible many of the places found in its teachings are still here today!

Yes I know that i'm not saying the lands and the citys and towns in the bible aren't real i'm just saying the Sagas are just as tru as the bible ! A story can be about something that's real but is it telling the truth about it or not !

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

In our storys WHIC is saga in icelandic (Story=saga) It says that the thins written in the Books are really!!! we've found ruins and Graves just by following the books !

So you admit the sagas are just stories and not real? Thanks. Which ruins and graves have you found exactly? And who else was with you?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Swedish and Icelandic is a little bit different.

Saga means Story
Ævintíri means Fairy tale

Okay, fine. It's not a fairy tale, it's a novel. What's the difference?

[Kindinn]

Re: Lazytown, pedophilia sex show.

Man alive, you are ignorant! Haven't I just showed you mountains of proofs in support of the Bible? Are you possessed by a retard demon?

OHH for the last time I'm not saying the history of the book isn't really!!! i mean it fist into the timeline and everything ... but NO ONE CAN PROOF that god had any kind of relations with the men and inspired them to writte about him That's what i'm trying to say... The people might have been real but everyone can lie and writte about anything they like!!!