X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Actually, I've seen some of the stuff that's been posted on here, and I disagree with everything here, so that's why I'm leaving.
    What do you disagree with?

    Leave a comment:


  • GayBilly
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by Mary Etheldreda View Post
    Why leave in such a hurry? You might find you learn something?
    Actually, I've seen some of the stuff that's been posted on here, and I disagree with everything here, so that's why I'm leaving.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Forget it. I'm not gonna argue with you any more. It's pointless to try to get you to see the other side of the arguement, because you barely listen to what I have to say. I've only been on this website for one day, and I'm already leaving. Enjoy your life of nothing.
    It is so sad that someone isn't prepared to put in more than a days effort to secure their eternal salvation.

    Proverbs 20:4 The sluggard will not plow by reason of the cold; therefore shall he beg in harvest, and have nothing.

    YIC

    Jack

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Forget it. I'm not gonna argue with you any more. It's pointless to try to get you to see the other side of the arguement, because you barely listen to what I have to say. I've only been on this website for one day, and I'm already leaving. Enjoy your life of nothing.
    Why leave in such a hurry? You might find you learn something?

    Leave a comment:


  • GayBilly
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by WilliamJenningsBryan View Post
    Son, you appear to be the least qualified to comment on Brother Hatchet's scholarly exposition. For starters, it's called "Opera" – not "Oprah", which refers to a socialsit negress actress and talk show host who is not only an Obama voter, but is also spreading her own blasphemous "New Age" religion.

    The "dance number" you are referring to is from the ballet Bacchanal (Venusberg) music from Richard Wagner's opera "Tannhäuser" and is not used "quite a lot". To anyone cultured, we all know what a "Bacchanal" is – a drunken orgy of sexual promiscuity.

    I could go on – like your pretend innocence about the supposed noun "Pork", which in modern argot has become a verb – to fornicate. Maybe you would like to try explaining why young children today are all taking Ritalin due to a massive outbreak of ADD/ADHD. I suppose, as you say, "Speedy Gonzales" has nothing to do with this.
    Forget it. I'm not gonna argue with you any more. It's pointless to try to get you to see the other side of the arguement, because you barely listen to what I have to say. I've only been on this website for one day, and I'm already leaving. Enjoy your life of nothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    ...
    Porky is named that because he is a pig, and pigs are PORK. Also, in cartoons, most Animals that where clothing don't seem to wear pants. Why? I have no idea.

    ...

    Next, how does Speedy Gonzales encourage children to take drugs? He's a comedically "speedy" mouse, as most mice are quite jittery. Also, "¡Ándale! ¡Ándale! ¡Arriba! ¡Arriba!" is not reciting a recipe for making drugs, he's actually saying "Get up! Get up! Let's go! Let's go!" but in spanish, which reinforces the fact that he is "Speedy".

    ...

    Is a still frame taken from one of the most critically acclaimed Looney Toons shorts, "What's Oprah, Doc". It is hailed as being the greatest cartoon short of all time, and the still frame is taken from a dance number in the short that is used quite a lot in Oprah, where one dancer takes the hips of another and pretends to "bounce" them across the stage. You're card stacking here, as you are only showing the still frame where it looks like their doing something risque. I believe you're looking WAY to far into this. Just enjoy the shorts, nothing bad was intended in them.
    Son, you appear to be the least qualified to comment on Brother Hatchet's scholarly exposition. For starters, it's called "Opera" – not "Oprah", which refers to a socialsit negress actress and talk show host who is not only an Obama voter, but is also spreading her own blasphemous "New Age" religion.

    The "dance number" you are referring to is from the ballet Bacchanal (Venusberg) music from Richard Wagner's opera "Tannhäuser" and is not used "quite a lot". To anyone cultured, we all know what a "Bacchanal" is – a drunken orgy of sexual promiscuity.

    I could go on – like your pretend innocence about the supposed noun "Pork", which in modern argot has become a verb – to fornicate. Maybe you would like to try explaining why young children today are all taking Ritalin due to a massive outbreak of ADD/ADHD. I suppose, as you say, "Speedy Gonzales" has nothing to do with this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by Brother Harold Porter View Post
    My friend, I am an ex-Gay cured by the love of Jesus Christ. But looking back on when I decided to be a queer, it all began with Looney Toons every Saturday morning. Just as Warner Brothers intended, I would turn on the television, climb on the couch under a blanket and masturbate furiously to Elmer Fudd, a degenerate fag in his own right.

    From there, it was a fondness for disco music, designer jeans and fern bars. In no time at all, I was a predatory sodomite chasing innocent male rectums all over town. Even straight friends were not safe from my insatiable and carnal lust as I would solicit them for homo sex when anonymous strangers were in short supply. The shame, the disease and despair..

    It all began with "harmless" cartoons and the danger of the subliminal messages that you fail to recognize.

    You are in my prayers.

    In Christ
    Brother Harold Porter, if more men where as honest as you maybe this affront to morality would have been stopped years ago.

    I don't think I saw the characters as a child but nobody can tell me this man I nothing but a predatory homo. Just look at that mustache. I believe he is called something like 'sodomite Sam'.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Thomas Dalton
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Um, what? How does that have anything to do with Looney Toons? A Skunk and Cat being in love would never make any sane human being believe that they could "forcibly sodomize and murder all of my friends and burn down my parents house."
    And there have been plenty of murderers and arsonists before the 1940's, I'll have you know.
    I know that when I watched this... O so humorous... () cartoon I got a deep desire to do unspeakable things to that cat. Her shining fur, her "don't touch me" attitude, yet so soft and smooth urged me to do... things better left unsaid.

    If I didn't have my personal KJV bible at hand at that time, who knows what I might have done! I mean, if I stopped following the bible to go to my father's stables and "cosy up" to a horse, why wouldn't I start raping and killing people?
    That's what I never understand about atheists. They always say they have morals and such, while I know for a fact that I would have slaughtered three annoying people in my life already if I didn't believe I would burn in Hell for eternity when I did. What's to stop me when I lose my faith?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Harold Porter
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    I'm not saying that the Bible isn't meant to be taken seriously, not at all. My intentions aren't to attack the Bible, I'm just saying that this cartoon is just that. A humorous cartoon that was originally created to lift spirits and improve resolve during the 40's and 50's. A cartoon shouldn't be taken too seriously.
    Also, when has Looney Toons ever caused a child to incite wanton, lustful, debauched behavior? I've never heard of that happening from a cartoon
    My friend, I am an ex-Gay cured by the love of Jesus Christ. But looking back on when I decided to be a queer, it all began with Looney Toons every Saturday morning. Just as Warner Brothers intended, I would turn on the television, climb on the couch under a blanket and masturbate furiously to Elmer Fudd, a degenerate fag in his own right.

    From there, it was a fondness for disco music, designer jeans and fern bars. In no time at all, I was a predatory sodomite chasing innocent male rectums all over town. Even straight friends were not safe from my insatiable and carnal lust as I would solicit them for homo sex when anonymous strangers were in short supply. The shame, the disease and despair..

    It all began with "harmless" cartoons and the danger of the subliminal messages that you fail to recognize.

    You are in my prayers.

    In Christ

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Yes, while that may be true, it doesn't mean Looney Toons caused them to do what they did.
    My many children have never so much as heard of Bugs Bunny and they're responsible, respectful True Christians™. They would never hurt another True Christian™. In fact, I don't believe I've known one True Christian™ who has watched a Looney Tune except for educational purposes.

    Correlation 100% - No Looney Tunes = No violence and sexual depravity

    Leave a comment:


  • GayBilly
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by Mary Etheldreda View Post
    Charles Manson
    Ted Bundy
    The Zodiac Killer
    Son of Sam
    Ru Paul

    Every single one of these people grew up watching Looney Toons. And the list goes on.
    Yes, while that may be true, it doesn't mean Looney Toons caused them to do what they did.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Also, when has Looney Toons ever caused a child to incite wanton, lustful, debauched behavior?
    Charles Manson
    Ted Bundy
    The Zodiac Killer
    Son of Sam
    Ru Paul

    Every single one of these people grew up watching Looney Toons. And the list goes on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    Where do I begin.
    Okay, first off, Looney Toons is a CARTOON. It's for entertainment, and not meant to be taken seriously.
    It's precisely this attitude that is the problem.

    This perversion is directed squarely at impressionable children, who then accept these depravities as normal because they haven't yet learned God's Law.
    Porky is named that because he is a pig, and pigs are PORK.
    Then why is he talking and wearing clothes instead of being eaten?
    Also, in cartoons, most Animals that where clothing don't seem to wear pants. Why? I have no idea.
    To encourage Furryism. Why else?
    Next, Pepe le Pew is a French Skunk, and French are stereotypically seen as great lovers. So, what else then to have him comically chase a Black and White cat around, thinking she's a skunk. Again, it's COMEDY.
    Yes, this pro-interracial-rape message is really funny.
    Next, how does Speedy Gonzales encourage children to take drugs? He's a comedically "speedy" mouse, as most mice are quite jittery. Also, "¡Ándale! ¡Ándale! ¡Arriba! ¡Arriba!" is not reciting a recipe for making drugs, he's actually saying "Get up! Get up! Let's go! Let's go!" but in spanish, which reinforces the fact that he is "Speedy".
    Because he's on SPEED.
    Great, Bugs Bunny. (sigh) Nothing is being "Glorified" here, all Bugs is doing is probably trying to mess with the antagonist of whatever short it is. Usually he'll dress like someone the antagonist is trying to get after, usually a woman, and will mess with them in some sort of antics.[/quote]
    That's exactly what Old Man Hatchet said. Did you bother to read his commentary, or just look at the pretty pictures?
    This image: Is a still frame taken from one of the most critically acclaimed Looney Toons shorts, "What's Oprah, Doc". It is hailed as being the greatest cartoon short of all time, and the still frame is taken from a dance number in the short that is used quite a lot in Oprah, where one dancer takes the hips of another and pretends to "bounce" them across the stage.
    Um, when was Bugs Bunny on Oprah?

    And since when do they dance on her show?



    You're card stacking here, as you are only showing the still frame where it looks like their doing something risque.
    Let's see: Male dressed in drag, dancing with another male, in a romantic scene.

    No, they're pretty much doing exactly that. Promoting transvestism and sodomarriage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Originally posted by willo10 View Post
    I'm not saying that the Bible isn't meant to be taken seriously, not at all. My intentions aren't to attack the Bible, I'm just saying that this cartoon is just that. A humorous cartoon that was originally created to lift spirits and improve resolve during the 40's and 50's. A cartoon shouldn't be taken too seriously.
    Also, when has Looney Toons ever caused a child to incite wanton, lustful, debauched behavior? I've never heard of that happening from a cartoon
    So we are to exempt cartoons from God's law just so as not to upset you. Anything else we ought to ignore so your lusts can be satisfied?
    Posted via Mobile Device

    Leave a comment:


  • GayBilly
    replied
    Re: Looney Tunes: Pornographic, Drug-Pushing, Gay Filth

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    The Holy Bible is, however, meant to be taken seriously.
    Luke 12:5 But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.

    Very seriously indeed.

    Inciting our children into wanton, lustful, debauched behaviour with no consequences for outrageously sinful actions is plain wrong.
    Colossians 3:5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:

    I'm not saying that the Bible isn't meant to be taken seriously, not at all. My intentions aren't to attack the Bible, I'm just saying that this cartoon is just that. A humorous cartoon that was originally created to lift spirits and improve resolve during the 40's and 50's. A cartoon shouldn't be taken too seriously.
    Also, when has Looney Toons ever caused a child to incite wanton, lustful, debauched behavior? I've never heard of that happening from a cartoon

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X