Tweet
Yes, the Bible says a great deal about God directing us to kill homers, but apart from that, I also disagree with the term "homersexuality" completely, and I will explain why just through the use of common sense.
Just look at lesbians: If this was a "sexuality" where a woman was somehow attracted to another woman, then why do lesbians dress male, act male and cut their hair short like males? Instead of acting all butch, aren't lesbians supposed to act feminine and womanly in order to attract a lesbian partner?
Lesbians clearly don't want other women. They really want men, but they're confused, because in these times there's a big shortage of men who act like actual men. In these times men has not only abandoned God, but also believes in feminism, equality and "getting in touch with ones feminine side". They're essentially women.
Meanwhile women are encouraged to take charge and work for a living and essentially fill the male shoes of the absent males. No wonder that unsupervised women get confused over this, and left without guidance, their attempts at knowing what to do often fail miserably, and we end up lesbians trying to grab on to what they recognize as male.
Besides the male homers who act feminine (and fall into the reverse category described above) we also have the male butch homers, who dress in black leather. Are there any doubts that their real attraction is actually to BDSM? While I don't believe in evolution, or that humans and animals share any genetical ties, in nature we see male animals having sex with other male animals, but even science documents this as a method of dominance, where the recieving animal is submitting to the dominant animal. Even evolutionists admit that there is no "love" going on there.
I believe that male butch homers are the product of the real manly men who see women "fall in love with" other women, and are left without a woman. Frustration builds, until they see other males as "in the way" of finding a woman, and having watched ungodly nature shows, they begin to imitate monkeys, dominating other men by sodomizing them, and in the end trying to make not men, but WOMEN out of them.
That's why I don't recognize homers as being "alternative" to normal sexuality. That's why I just see them as confused and in need of the Bible.
Just look at lesbians: If this was a "sexuality" where a woman was somehow attracted to another woman, then why do lesbians dress male, act male and cut their hair short like males? Instead of acting all butch, aren't lesbians supposed to act feminine and womanly in order to attract a lesbian partner?
Lesbians clearly don't want other women. They really want men, but they're confused, because in these times there's a big shortage of men who act like actual men. In these times men has not only abandoned God, but also believes in feminism, equality and "getting in touch with ones feminine side". They're essentially women.
Meanwhile women are encouraged to take charge and work for a living and essentially fill the male shoes of the absent males. No wonder that unsupervised women get confused over this, and left without guidance, their attempts at knowing what to do often fail miserably, and we end up lesbians trying to grab on to what they recognize as male.
Besides the male homers who act feminine (and fall into the reverse category described above) we also have the male butch homers, who dress in black leather. Are there any doubts that their real attraction is actually to BDSM? While I don't believe in evolution, or that humans and animals share any genetical ties, in nature we see male animals having sex with other male animals, but even science documents this as a method of dominance, where the recieving animal is submitting to the dominant animal. Even evolutionists admit that there is no "love" going on there.
I believe that male butch homers are the product of the real manly men who see women "fall in love with" other women, and are left without a woman. Frustration builds, until they see other males as "in the way" of finding a woman, and having watched ungodly nature shows, they begin to imitate monkeys, dominating other men by sodomizing them, and in the end trying to make not men, but WOMEN out of them.
That's why I don't recognize homers as being "alternative" to normal sexuality. That's why I just see them as confused and in need of the Bible.
Comment