[Alvin Moss]

Re: What should we call fags?

You know what you cracker *** potty language *** ! I have worked hard in life to become what I am now and i'm not gonna just sit here and watch you judge me cause of who I love. Me Castiel are in love and plan to get married on Christmas. I went to college, got my degree, and make 700,000$ a year so ya'll wanna call me a fag cause i'm gay fine. Just remember unlike ya'll mother *** potty language *** who think you all are good people cause you preach the lord but in reality i'm getting salvation and ya'll goin to hell cause it says in the bible Love thy neighbor and as long as i'm yo neighbor in the mortal realm you better *** potty language *** love me. Peace homies, im making waffles!
Sincerely, Gavin Weiss

You seem angry, Negroe.

I hope you won't reveal your profession, because if the servant class was to find out that a near illiterate can make $700,000 a year doing it, we would never get our lawns mowed.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: What should we call fags?

Here are a few I've come across: bum bandit – bum chum – butt hugger – chickenhawk – Fairy – flamer – fruit – gaylord – homo – homo thug – jobby jabber – lemon – nellie – Peter Puffer – pole smoker – poof – Poofter - queer - skin flute player - Anal assassin - Back door bandit - Fudge packer - Knob jockey - nancy boy - Pansy - Pillow biter - Rump Ranger - Turd burglar...

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go take a good long shower.

[Wide-Open]

Re: What should we call fags?

Tallywhacker snacker seems appropriate, but when you see one he might have raped you before you are at the snack part.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: What should we call fags?

Friends in Christ,

While this post is most necessary, I also am exceedingly sorrowful that it has come to this. Why are posts such as this one needed? It should be obvious that all names we use to describe homers are correct as long as they are relevant to the actual MISSION, winning souls for Jesus! If the names we use cause irritation, anxiety or bad feeling among the sinners, the better it is - or SHOULD BE. You can never, NEVER, damage a pervert homer more with words than the damage he is actually causing himself and his potential immortality by allowing the entrance of another thickly corrupted male organ into his nether gates. All the upset we might cause is ultimately for the GOOD as it contains the possibility of repentance and ultimate TRIUMPH for CHRIST! Thus, the worse a name feels to a homer, the more GOOD it might cause! It like a wake-up call from JESUS!

Oh, I miss the old times. It aches as I miss them so much. Men were men, women were submissive and fluffy bunnies were animal members of the rabbitkind that were good and reasonably bloody targets for practise shooting!

All this is persecution and harassment of True Christians™. We no longer may call SIN A SIN without lieberals suing and persecuting. It is the worldwide scheme of SATAN and his minions.

Isaiah 32:5-6
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said [to be] bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thristy to fail.

I think that using any name a True Christian™ comes up in Christian LOVE with regards to homertrash is in concert with God's Master PLAN. After all, it is all for the benefit of these unclean godless homers who MUST finally WAKE UP and ask for God's forgiveness!

Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: What should we call fags?

Homosexuality is so repulsive that any term for it will eventually become a slur. When I hear fag and dyke, I recoil—not because the words are offensive, but because they bring to mind the most gruesome images of unnatural copulation. And so it is with gay. This was supposed to be a benign term to hide everything un-gay about sodomy, but it didn't work. Children, uncorrupted and honest, recognized that gay is wrong and began using it as a playground taunt, leading to the monumental efforts of today's propagandists to cleanse them of good sense. If gay is irreparably tainted, they'll come up with something even more pleasant-sounding while they burrow deeper into the mire of sin.

So while I would rather not talk or think about them at all, that's not a luxury we have right now. There's no reason not to call them by the harshest possible names.

Bubonic butt-blasters will do just fine.

[ExGay Alex]

Re: What should we call fags?

I am partial to referring to the penivores as "boofers." It kind of combines two words (one an anatomical reference, the other a verb) that are redolent of gay anal sex.

[Jerome Jefferson III]

Re: What should we call fags?

Ass pirates.

[Jerome Jefferson III]

Re: What should we call fags?

and what about them lesbians?

[ExGay Alex]

Re: What should we call fags?

and what about them lesbians?

Vagitarians.

[WWJDnow]

Re: What should we call fags?

"Sodomite" is a good word to use, since it's in the King James Bible.

I also tend to favor the Biblical term sodomite. In mixed company, I often use the formulation that the Apostle Paul preferred, those who:

leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. Romans 1:27

If I'm being lazy, I usually just call them homos.

[ExGay Alex]

Re: What should we call fags?

I also tend to favor the Biblical term sodomite. In mixed company, I often use the formulation that the Apostle Paul preferred, those who:

leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. Romans 1:27

If I'm being lazy, I usually just call them homos.

I find it inspiring to use the Bible to help us find answers. I like this verse, Romans 1:27, and it brings to my mind some new terms that I am just now inventing. Such as "bumluster" and "man-receptacle".

[TheLittleBoy]

Re: What should we call fags?

I believe homosexuals and lesbians should have the same amount of respect as heterosexuals in a civilized society.

Giving out names like this while being adults is very derisive as it is a very childish thing to do.

Reading you guys remind me these studies, saying that homophobic people are more likely to be gay themselves: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/op...f=opinion&_r=0

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_fuel2.htm

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2012/04/homophobic_maybe_you_re_gay_the_new_york_times_on_a_new_study_of_secret_sexuality_.html

[Steph Leia]

Re: What should we call fags?

I believe homosexuals and lesbians should have the same amount of respect as heterosexuals in a civilized society.

Giving out names like this while being adults is very derisive as it is a very childish thing to do.

Reading you guys remind me these studies, saying that homophobic people are more likely to be gay themselves: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/op...f=opinion&_r=0

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_fuel2.htm

http://www.slate.com/articles/health...exuality_.html

No true Christian (which is 90% of the people on this site) is going to be a homosexual. If they were, then they would not be a true Christian, because homosexuality is against the bible, and if they were then they are not true Christians. And no one on this site is a homophobe, meaning they hate gay people. Instead, the true Christians care for gay people, so they try and save them from an eternity in the pits of hell. If that is not an act of love, then what is?


Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 20:13
1 Timothy 1:10 kinda
1 Corinthians 7:2
Genesis 38:9-10 again, kind of not exactly.

[TheLittleBoy]

Re: What should we call fags?

No true Christian (which is 90% of the people on this site) is going to be a homosexual. If they were, then they would not be a true Christian, because homosexuality is against the bible, and if they were then they are not true Christians. And no one on this site is a homophobe, meaning they hate gay people. Instead, the true Christians care for gay people, so they try and save them from an eternity in the pits of hell. If that is not an act of love, then what is?


Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 20:13
1 Timothy 1:10 kinda
1 Corinthians 7:2
Genesis 38:9-10 again, kind of not exactly.

Act of love? Leviticus 20:13 ?

If you guy really care about homosexuals, you wouldn't combine your effort to find new pejorative terms to call them with.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: What should we call fags?

I believe homosexuals and lesbians should have the same amount of respect as heterosexuals in a civilized society.

Who cares what you think? Your unsaved opinions aren't worth a bucket of warm spittle. All we care about is what Jesus says.

He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.
Proverbs 28:26