Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

We all know what it's like to live under tyrannical rule (Joe Biden). But which form of oppression is worse?

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

Canadians are oppressed people too. Don't ask me - ask Lauren Boebert.

“[W]e also have neighbors to the north who need freedom and you need to be liberated and we need that right here at home.”

That Northern border wall idea doesn't sound so stupid now, does it? At the very least we should be massing a liberation force ready to defend Canada's freedom.

[WWJDnow]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

The main reason Russia had to invade Ukraine was to free the Ukrainian people from their government's oppressive mask mandates. So the answer is easy: b.

[handmaiden]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

The main reason Russia had to invade Ukraine was to free the Ukrainian people from their government's oppressive mask mandates. So the answer is easy: b.

When this is all said and done, I certainly hope the illegally installed Ukrainian leadership are all brought up on war crimes charges.

[WWJDnow]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

Now that I see we have some new options, I think taking my money and assets is even worse than mask mandates. I wouldn't mind if it didn't all go to lazy minority welfare moms and their children who refuse to work for a living.

[Adam Fag]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

The main reason Russia had to invade Ukraine was to free the Ukrainian people from their government's oppressive mask mandates. So the answer is easy: b.

I don't mind if you know my vote. "A."

If you wear a mask you are free to come and go as you please. If you don't, you're not.

Karl Marx did not wear a mask and the reds are not free.

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

Definitely wearing a mask. After all, oppresion gives birth to new Saints, at least.

[Isabella White]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

Definitely wearing a mask. After all, oppresion gives birth to new Saints, at least.

Absolutely, dear Mr. Rovagnati! Being forced to wear a mask is a form of tyranny — there is simply no other way of saying it. I mean, look at all of the reports that we have read in the news, about people who were denied entry to a store, for not wearing a mask. If that isn't communist oppression, then I don't know what is.

And, it's not like the Red Army is made up of dictator-types who are out there on a "do as I tell you — or else" mission. Goodness, no. Why, most of them come across as being fun-loving types; people who are jolly and who love sharing their love of good times, as you shall see here:

[Roland]

Re: Which is worse: (a) being invaded by the Red Army (b) wearing a face mask

. Why, most of them come across as being fun-loving types; people who are jolly and who love sharing their love of good times, as you shall see here:

They are definitely not skipping ´leg day´ And it looks like fun, at least there they are not shooting people and blowing stuff up. Can we go back to that?