Secular Science proves the Bible?

[Barabbas]

This is a snippet of an article I've run across that would appear to be secular science supporting the Bible. I did not post a link to the entire article or post much of it because I'm not sure how welcomed that would be here.

Six clay seals unearthed in Israel could prove that Kings David and Solomon actually existed.

For years scholars have dismissed these two biblical figures and their kingdoms as mythological, but now the discovery of six clay bullae, which were unearthed during a dig at Khirbet Summeily in Israel, has offered the first direct evidence that there was a ruler in the region during the 9th and 10th centuries BC.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

... Six clay seals unearthed in Israel could prove that there was something bigger than just a tiny farming village in the middle of nowhere about 14 miles east of present-day Gaza, possibly related to a previously unknown kingdom in the area, but frankly any attempts to suggest these poorly described fragments of clay somehow prove that the Biblical kings David and Solomon really existed are but fanciful, wishful thinking by some who would wildly grasp at any straw to support their chosen delusion....

FTFY.

The TCs will run with it, ofc.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

This is a snippet of an article I've run across that would appear to be secular science supporting the Bible.

I neither desire nor require such shaky-legged support.

For years scholars have dismissed these two biblical figures and their kingdoms as mythological...

Not any biblical scholars I'm familiar with.

[Barabbas]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

I neither desire nor require such shaky-legged support.



Not any biblical scholars I'm familiar with.

I apologize Brother Zechariah. It wasn't my intention to offend. I only thought perhaps is the Atheist Scientists proved the existence of Kings David and Solomon (of course we know the Bible already has) then it might be a small victory for the True Christians.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

Mr. Barabbas,

As you probably know, True Christians are subjected to constant ridicule and persecution by the 'scientific' commienity. That is why Creation Science needs to be very careful with proper referencing and citations. A snippet is not a proof unless the actual source is cited. It becomes hearsay and assertions. Creation Science is based on the Bible and the Good Book actually agrees with secular researchers on the importance of proper references.

Romans 13:7
Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

It is our duty to spread the Word to unbelievers. This is not an easy task. You have to be able to assess the reliability of a source, cite it in a correct manner AND provide a sound Biblical basis to harmonize the findings with the literal reading of God's Message.

Q.E.D.



Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Barabbas]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

Mr. Barabbas,

As you probably know, True Christians are subjected to constant ridicule and persecution by the 'scientific' commienity. That is why Creation Science needs to be very careful with proper referencing and citations. A snippet is not a proof unless the actual source is cited. It becomes hearsay and assertions. Creation Science is based on the Bible and the Good Book actually agrees with secular researchers on the importance of proper references.

Romans 13:7
Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

It is our duty to spread the Word to unbelievers. This is not an easy task. You have to be able to assess the reliability of a source, cite it in a correct manner AND provide a sound Biblical basis to harmonize the findings with the literal reading of God's Message.

Q.E.D.



Yours in Christ,

Elmer

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...entury-BC.html

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

I'm mildly interested. How does this relate to Scripture?

Matthew 22:29
Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Ex-soccer player]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

I only thought perhaps is the Atheist Scientists proved the existence of Kings David and Solomon (of course we know the Bible already has) then it might be a small victory for the True Christians.

True Christians do not need support by "secular science" and atheists to gain a "small victory". It's the other way round, it's a victory for secular scientists when their findings are supported by the Holy Bible because that means that they are right for once!

Imagine you have a machine to use. The builder of the machine has provided a detailed manual. You read the manual carefully, and then you see that the machine works exactly in the way described in the manual. What would be the point to have a "scientist" disassemble the machine and check if the manual is accurate? You KNOW that the manual, written by the builder himself, is right because it proves itself in regular use.

Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. - Psalm 119:105

[Mrs. Elizabeth Johnson]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

Well, secular scientists are liars. Just look at Darwin and his monkeys and evilotion. It never made any sense to me, or more importantly, my pastor and Ph.D. of a husband.

[OverlyAttachedJaviera]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

Well, secular scientists are liars. Just look at Darwin and his monkeys and evilotion. It never made any sense to me, or more importantly, my pastor and Ph.D. of a husband.

Just because you don't understand something, that's doesn't mean is a lie, maybe if you read some science books you and your husband could understand it, there's nothing wrong with wanting to learn something new

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Secular Science proves the Bible?

Just because I don't understand something, that's doesn't mean is a lie, maybe if I read the KJV (1611) I could understand it, there's nothing wrong with wanting to learn something new

ftfy