X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

    Mr Taylor, your post has made me wonder about the original poster, Mr Beleifs. He says he comes from Indiana. Do you think this might be autocorrect for India? It would explain a lot.

    Have the hindoos now given up on using the telephone for their marketing scams and adopted the use of internet forums? I think we should be told!
    Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

      Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
      Mr Taylor, your post has made me wonder about the original poster, Mr Beleifs. He says he comes from Indiana. Do you think this might be autocorrect for India? It would explain a lot.

      Have the hindoos now given up on using the telephone for their marketing scams and adopted the use of internet forums? I think we should be told!

      Miss Joanna, I believe that this is, in fact, the case. The stilted use of the English language and the terrible spelling settled it for me. Having worked among the Hindaloos for many years I should have noticed it earlier.
      Isaiah 66:15

      For behold, the Lord wil come with fire, and with his charets like a whirlewinde, to render his anger with furie, and his rebuke with flames of fire.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

        Do not mix me up with the OP (original poster)...
        I live in Canada....
        If anyone wants to know more about Bible prophecies that are being fulfilled in the last few decades, and even in the last few years, take a look at some videos by ( Israeli news live )...

        Take for example, Isis was destroying many of the valuable ancient statues, in Syria and Iraq, using sludge hammers, heavy equipment, and any other means, only a couple years ago... This area is in the area of ancient Babylon. It was pointed out that one of those prophecies was that idols in Babylon would be broken to pieces, and this fulfilled another prophecy in great detail ...

        Prophecies are being fulfilled faster now then any time in the last thousand years.... Condescending remarks are not beneficial....

        Gilbert Schmidt...
        ================================================
        These are not my words. These are not Isaiah's words. These are God's words.
        Thus saith the Lord, behold, the Lord WILL come with fire, and with his chariots. Those eating swine’s flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed Isaiah 66:15-17

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

          Originally posted by docscience View Post
          Take for example, Isis was destroying many of the valuable ancient statues, in Syria and Iraq, using sludge hammers
          The sludge hammer sounds like the least effective implement ever invented.

          Originally posted by docscience View Post
          Condescending remarks are not beneficial....
          Try to calm down, dear. And do stop hijacking the OP's personal introductory thread for your own purposes - you have a perfectly good one of your own. If anyone does want to know more about whatever it is you are on about, I'm quite sure they'll ask you there.

          All the very best, dear
          In Him
          JL-V
          Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

            Originally posted by docscience View Post
            Take for example, Isis was destroying many of the valuable ancient statues, in Syria and Iraq, using sludge hammers, heavy equipment, and any other means, only a couple years ago... This area is in the area of ancient Babylon. It was pointed out that one of those prophecies was that idols in Babylon would be broken to pieces, and this fulfilled another prophecy in great detail ...

            Prophecies are being fulfilled faster now then any time in the last thousand years.... Condescending remarks are not beneficial....

            Gilbert Schmidt...
            Skeptics will of course point out such things as WWII and the Napoleonic Wars also taking pot shots at ancient Babylon, and the fact that in years past news was passed by word of mouth, not video-recorded and shared in real time so we can't really compare today with yesterday. But naysayers know nothing but sin and deserve nothing but an eternity of excruciating pain and suffering because they refuse to believe the stories in the Holy Bible are true, despite being so fantastic they require blind faith to accept as true. Shame on them.

            They shall be damned for all eternity and we shall praise Jesus! We will praise Jesus for slaying His enemies and allowing us to dance the victory dance in their blood (Psalm 68:23)! We'll stomp around their intestines like Lucile Ball stomped around those grapes! We'll glorify Christ as we pick up the eyeballs and spleens of those poor, stupid children who never heard the Gospel, and we'll let our children play games with them, like marbles and hopscotch and egg toss. We'll pick their veins and sinew from our teeth as we grin in victory, for Satan shall never triumph, and those who do his work will become like Soylent Green for the Christian soul!

            Glory!


            How happy we will be to stomp on the hearts of our enemies!

            Thank you Jesus!
            Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

              Originally posted by docscience View Post
              They have given sum figures for die off events for each year, at the one site that I listed....

              That site has information from
              • Marine biologists
              • Russian Academy of Scientists
              • Coral Bleaching Scientists
              • Biology Journals
              • "The New Scientist"
              • the journal "Nature"
              • the Journal "Science"
              • Zoological Society of London

              to name but eight. That last one is actually celebrating Charles Darwin and sees no shame in that as their blurb displays quite well!

              To honour the man who has influenced so many of us at ZSL and celebrate his birthday on 12 February (1809) we're highlight the close relationship that Darwin had with the society during his lifetime.
              According to these scientists 99.9999% of all species had already gone extinct before the decades you refer to had begun.

              Why do you accept this "scientific method" when you announce about the amount of animal deaths being far in access of anything that has happened in the decades before but not on other matters? In fact you make claims which scientists oppose. Either you have faith in science or you have faith in Jesus. Which is it?

              Please help to settle my confusion.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

                I only use the websites because it gives a good description of the recent die off figures, with links to the source references. When you look over the die off events, you can see that many are extreme in nature.
                What ever else he writes, I just have to ignore, because it is the die off figures I need. Do I have to write a disclaimer, when I reference something . I am just making a statement, not really looking for an answer to that. I do not wish to add more to this thread. Thankyou for your concerns.
                ================================================
                These are not my words. These are not Isaiah's words. These are God's words.
                Thus saith the Lord, behold, the Lord WILL come with fire, and with his chariots. Those eating swine’s flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed Isaiah 66:15-17

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Not an Introduction; a Questioning

                  Originally posted by docscience View Post
                  I only use the websites because it gives a good description of the recent die off figures, with links to the source references. When you look over the die off events, you can see that many are extreme in nature.
                  What ever else he writes, I just have to ignore, because it is the die off figures I need.
                  You have not explained why you accept the word of scientists only sometimes. But not at other times. And why you accept only some of their claims but not others. I do read scientific material now and then so if there's a handy mnemonic you could leave for me so I know which bits of science are accurate and reliable and which bits I should ignore I would appreciate that.

                  Do I have to write a disclaimer, when I reference something . I am just making a statement, not really looking for an answer to that. I do not wish to add more to this thread. Thankyou for your concerns.

                  A disclaimer would only be necessary if you expected people to read the link and see what the sources were.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X