[Basilissa]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

There is only supposed to be one not though

Please stop changing the subject. I'm still waiting for your reply to my last post:

I haven't seen you addressing Scripture I have cited.

The only talking points I take are directly from the Bible. You can keep calling me names, that doesn't bother me. In fact, I feel blessed by your persecution.

Luke 6:22 - Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you [from their company], and shall reproach [you], and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.

So is the Bible lying in the verses I cited?

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I made a correction, in nod to your preference for double negatives!

There is only supposed to be one not though

[Jim C. Lombardo]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I'm not not a pervert

I made a correction, in nod to your preference for double negatives!

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Yes you are, yes it is, and yes it does!


All this sass from a heathen who won't even accept that God wrote the Bible!


In what world is it acceptable for depraved parents to dress their daughters in flesh-colored spandex to dance some erotic contortions choreographed by a hopelessly sick Frenchy for the pleasure of some Larry Nassar type who calls himself OneFailure? Certainly not in the one created by God!


Please post the phone number of your ballet studio so I can call and warn them they have a sex criminal enrolled as a student.

People in ballet dont wear spandex and ballet isnt erotic at all. Your think of a dance entity different from the dance form I know about

I'm not enrolled for sick reasons! I'm enrolled to learn how to dance! I'm not a pervert

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Yes you are, and yes it does. I have debunked the myth of macho ballet dancers yet. Look at my earlier posts.

I dont follow the catholic religion! I never said I did. Also their are plenty of Male ballet dancers who are straight and not girly whatsoever. The stereotype is so old and overused and has been proven wrong so many times

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I'm not a papist and ballet isnt perverted either nor does it make men sissies

Yes you are, yes it is, and yes it does!


All this sass from a heathen who won't even accept that God wrote the Bible!


In what world is it acceptable for depraved parents to dress their daughters in flesh-colored spandex to dance some erotic contortions choreographed by a hopelessly sick Frenchy for the pleasure of some Larry Nassar type who calls himself OneFailure? Certainly not in the one created by God!


Please post the phone number of your ballet studio so I can call and warn them they have a sex criminal enrolled as a student.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Yes, and it is when the person knows what he is doing, otherwise you are just a ring kisser papist scum.

Absolutely, Brother Gonz! There are far too many unfortunate people who have been "baptized" as infants - the despicable Anglican church (no more than papists by another name) also does this - at a time when they have nothing but their own selfish desires in their black hearts. Some (sadly, very few) of these people see God's Divine Truth in later life and may possibly be lucky enough to be accepted for baptism a second time, when they are deemed to be Saved(tm). But decisions on this are a matter for our beloved pastors.

[Brother Gonzalez]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I'm not a papist and ballet isnt perverted either nor does it make men sissies

Yes you are, and yes it does. I have debunked the myth of macho ballet dancers yet. Look at my earlier posts.

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Yes, and it is when the person knows what he is doing, otherwise you are just a ring kisser papist scum. Stay away from the kids, you perverted ballet dancer, sissy boy.

I'm not a papist and ballet isnt perverted either nor does it make men sissies

[Brother Gonzalez]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Baptism is needed only one time in a persons life. Once a person has been baptized he or she never has to repeat this process

Yes, and it is when the person knows what he is doing, otherwise you are just a ring kisser papist scum. Stay away from the kids, you perverted ballet dancer, sissy boy.

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Well it matters if your taking a calvanist talking point and making it your own.

Unbaptized babies are innocent of sin they dont have the capacity to sin

Also child baptism does work so stop. Second baptisms are not required

Baptism is needed only one time in a persons life. Once a person has been baptized he or she never has to repeat this process

[Basilissa]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Look back at my posts debunking it!

I haven't seen you addressing Scripture I have cited.

Well it matters if your taking a calvanist talking point and making it your own.

The only talking points I take are directly from the Bible. You can keep calling me names, that doesn't bother me. In fact, I feel blessed by your persecution.

Luke 6:22 - Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you [from their company], and shall reproach [you], and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.

Unbaptized babies are innocent of sin they dont have the capacity to sin

Also child baptism does work so stop. Second baptisms are not required

So is the Bible lying in the verses I cited?

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I don't want to research Calvinism. I don't care what the Calvinists believe. I just care about what the Bible says.

That's a lie, you only copied a text authored by someone else, and I have properly rebuked it with Scripture.

Dear, adult baptism (and, by extension, damnation of dead babies) it is the fundamental belief which separates Baptists from non-Baptists.

From Wikipedia:
For your reference, I'm copying the relevant verses again:

Romans 5:12 - Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: -> That means, we are all born sinners.

John 3:5 - Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. -> That means, only the baptized people can go to Heaven, because baptism cleanses us of our sins (including the original sin we inherit from Adam and Eve). Babies and fetuses which died unbaptized go to Hell.

Acts 2:41 - Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls. -> That means you have to accept Jesus as your Savior first before you are baptized. That means child baptism does not work, which means babies who died after being baptized in their infancy also go to Hell.

And they will burn in Hell for believing against what the Bible says.

Well, since there is no evidence in the Bible, the "evidence" you provided is meaningless.

Well it matters if your taking a calvanist talking point and making it your own.

Unbaptized babies are innocent of sin they dont have the capacity to sin

Also child baptism does work so stop. Second baptisms are not required

[OneFailure]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

Where? Quote and show, with relevant links and scripture.

Look back at my posts debunking it!

[Basilissa]

Re: It's not me torturing you, it's my inability to make a valid argument

I don't need to you can do that yourself just do some research on calvanism and the subject of infant destination and you'll see what I mean

I don't want to research Calvinism. I don't care what the Calvinists believe. I just care about what the Bible says.

I just debunked infant damnation several times already

That's a lie, you only copied a text authored by someone else, and I have properly rebuked it with Scripture.

Infant damnation isnt even believed by most baptists.

It's not even a Baptist belief

Dear, adult baptism (and, by extension, damnation of dead babies) it is the fundamental belief which separates Baptists from non-Baptists.

From Wikipedia:

Baptists are Christians distinguished by baptizing professing believers only (believer's baptism, as opposed to infant baptism),

For your reference, I'm copying the relevant verses again:

Romans 5:12 - Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: -> That means, we are all born sinners.

John 3:5 - Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. -> That means, only the baptized people can go to Heaven, because baptism cleanses us of our sins (including the original sin we inherit from Adam and Eve). Babies and fetuses which died unbaptized go to Hell.

Acts 2:41 - Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls. -> That means you have to accept Jesus as your Savior first before you are baptized. That means child baptism does not work, which means babies who died after being baptized in their infancy also go to Hell.

You'll have no idea how many baptists I have seen on internet forums or even videos say that they would comfort parents who have lost a child or a brother who has lost a baby sister and they believd that babies are in heaven

And they will burn in Hell for believing against what the Bible says.

Yes I did debunk the belief I've shown all the evidence their is

Well, since there is no evidence in the Bible, the "evidence" you provided is meaningless.