Greetings and Salutations.
My background is not of much significance. I am an Anti theist from Europe, if you're very curious. One metaphysical concept I value above all others is logic; I believe it, alongside evidence, is the only way of finding out Truth. I think many people on these forums would agree with that.
I have explored these forums, and in some places have found them lacking logic. I think logic is imperative to all discussion, statements and beliefs, and if you disagree I should like to tackle any misconceptions first.
So, here I present to you The Three Laws of Logic:
The Law of Identity
If a statement is true, it is indeed true.
That is to say, if the statement "God exists" is true, the statement "God exists" is true.
Or, as a formula: P = P
The Law of Non-Contradiction
If a statement is true, it is not false in the same sense, and vice verse.
That is to say, if the statement "God exists" is true, it cannot be false in the same sense. It could be false in another reality or a thought experiment, but not in the same place and time.
Or, as a formula: P ≠ not P
The Law of Excluded Middle
A statement can either be true or false, there is no alternative.
That is to say, the statement "God exists" is either true or false; It cannot be both, neither or something else.
Or as a formula: Either P or not P
Indirectly from these follow several logical fallacies, which, if used in an argument, make the argument fallacious (illogical, invalid). There are too many to list here, so instead I present a link to a somewhat complete list of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
With that being stated, I hope you will agree that these rules are imperative to all discussion, and that disobeying them leads to anarchy. If you do not, please explain why you reject them.
Next I present the potentially outrageous statement that even God must be subject to these laws. If he wasn't, he would simultaneously exist, not exist, create this world, destroy this world, give this world logical laws, not give this world logical laws. This is the second point that I would like to settle in discussion.
Finally, on this thread I would like to correct one enormous error I have seen in your discussions. I have several times seen a statement similar to "Where in the Bible does is say that the Bible isn't true?". This sort of statement is fallacious as it commits the Circular Reasoning fallacy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning) by using the Bible to confirm the Bible. The argument, broken down, is as follows:
Premise 1: The Bible is fact.
Premise 2: The Bible states that the Bible is fact.
Conclusion: The Bible is fact.
This argument is fallacious, as its first premise relies on its conclusion. Please realise that that doesn't mean that the conclusion is invalid - it just means that this argument is not a valid means of reaching said conclusion. This is the final thing I would like to discuss on this thread.
Beyond that, I want to go and correct the logical fallacies and non-sequetors in other arguments on this forum. I believe that through this, we can all get closer to the Truth, whatever that may be. (About specific topics as well as general ones)
T.L.D.R. (Summary): Logic is important. Some arguments on this forum are not wholly logical. I would like to help correct them.
My background is not of much significance. I am an Anti theist from Europe, if you're very curious. One metaphysical concept I value above all others is logic; I believe it, alongside evidence, is the only way of finding out Truth. I think many people on these forums would agree with that.
I have explored these forums, and in some places have found them lacking logic. I think logic is imperative to all discussion, statements and beliefs, and if you disagree I should like to tackle any misconceptions first.
So, here I present to you The Three Laws of Logic:
The Law of Identity
If a statement is true, it is indeed true.
That is to say, if the statement "God exists" is true, the statement "God exists" is true.
Or, as a formula: P = P
The Law of Non-Contradiction
If a statement is true, it is not false in the same sense, and vice verse.
That is to say, if the statement "God exists" is true, it cannot be false in the same sense. It could be false in another reality or a thought experiment, but not in the same place and time.
Or, as a formula: P ≠ not P
The Law of Excluded Middle
A statement can either be true or false, there is no alternative.
That is to say, the statement "God exists" is either true or false; It cannot be both, neither or something else.
Or as a formula: Either P or not P
Indirectly from these follow several logical fallacies, which, if used in an argument, make the argument fallacious (illogical, invalid). There are too many to list here, so instead I present a link to a somewhat complete list of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
With that being stated, I hope you will agree that these rules are imperative to all discussion, and that disobeying them leads to anarchy. If you do not, please explain why you reject them.
Next I present the potentially outrageous statement that even God must be subject to these laws. If he wasn't, he would simultaneously exist, not exist, create this world, destroy this world, give this world logical laws, not give this world logical laws. This is the second point that I would like to settle in discussion.
Finally, on this thread I would like to correct one enormous error I have seen in your discussions. I have several times seen a statement similar to "Where in the Bible does is say that the Bible isn't true?". This sort of statement is fallacious as it commits the Circular Reasoning fallacy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning) by using the Bible to confirm the Bible. The argument, broken down, is as follows:
Premise 1: The Bible is fact.
Premise 2: The Bible states that the Bible is fact.
Conclusion: The Bible is fact.
This argument is fallacious, as its first premise relies on its conclusion. Please realise that that doesn't mean that the conclusion is invalid - it just means that this argument is not a valid means of reaching said conclusion. This is the final thing I would like to discuss on this thread.
Beyond that, I want to go and correct the logical fallacies and non-sequetors in other arguments on this forum. I believe that through this, we can all get closer to the Truth, whatever that may be. (About specific topics as well as general ones)
T.L.D.R. (Summary): Logic is important. Some arguments on this forum are not wholly logical. I would like to help correct them.



for all of eternity. And why is that, you may well ask? Well, it's because you are ignoring the plain black & white truths that are contained within the blessed
. If you think you are smarter than
Almighty, then you still have a lot to learn, but your pride is standing in your way. Why don't you just admit that you are wrong, and open up your
IF you confess your sins, turn your life over completely to the
, and repent of your sinful ways, and live the rest of your life serving the
of
Comment