X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    When is this avalanche of wishy washy pompous personal opinions going to end so we can get back to praising Jesus for dying so as to highlight a glowing path to Heaven for us so we don't burn like we are born deserving?
    Posted via Mobile Device

    Leave a comment:


  • ryan000smith, queerboy
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Your argument is very anti-motivational and works counter productive for me, YOU have your own thoughts, your husband wants to tell me something? He can tell me himself, not tell you what to say and when to say it... Furthermore I don't care how intelligent your husband is, it doesn't change the fact that I don't think hes a very good person. I never spread a single word of current self hate for myself.
    And on a different note, I am asking your husband (since I have no better way to talk to him than through you) that if he wasn't a Jesus freak, would he be able to have sex with a man? No I didn't think so, so one can assume that it is not so easy for me with a woman... and as for the little boys comment, that is another, extremely narrow minded comment that is generalized because I'm gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sister Blister
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    Third, to the lady who can't think for herself because she has no free will, Is your husband gay? No? Then how does he know that being gay is a choice... Being gay is as much of a choice to me as being straight is a choice to you... snorting coke is a habit, being gay is a sexual attraction which is a synopsis in your brain which triggers your sex drive in ways that only your sex drive can control. I cannot control what my biological mind wants... You people really need to learn how to read for information... I have said it more than once and I'll say it again, being gay has never been a decision, any one who tells you it is, is either bisexual, straight and thinks they know everything, or retarded.
    My husband chooses to be a man of God and be straight just like he chooses not to do drugs, drink, or participate in any of Satan's other favorite activities. (to include dancing) You are proving my very intelligent husband's point by being so angry over your being gay. You don't have to be angry and hate yourself. Just stop engaging in abhorrent acts of sin with other men and little boys; accept Jesus and follow him and your life will be joyful. Also, my husband says if you do accept Jesus and stop fellating other men, you also have to man up because being effeminate is a sin. I'm going to pray that you do these things. Praise be to Jesus!

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Anglican "bibles" have expiration dates? Who knew!


    Posted via Mobile Device

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Waynetta Kerr
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    This poor boy is crying out for the Lord and you are being so scary to him.

    Teenagers are often so confused. I feel your pain, Ryan. Imagine what we women have gone through to become ordained. But we won through and the church marches on into the 21st century with a sensible approach to ancient and outmoded scripture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    you guys can't do shit to me lol, and yet again redeemed, as soon as I bring up something that is negative about you guys, you specifically, y'all dodge around it like a frigging like poles magnet, I never even inquired about leaving again, your just too much of a puss to admit you were wrong. Like all bible freaks...
    It's more that nobody can make head nor tail of your deranged ramblings and we've pretty much run the full spectrum of whining teenagers pouting about "God isn't fair cos he won't let me do as I damn well please without burning me forever" a hundred times already.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    Hmmm, the majority of those people are bat shit crazy... your argument is invalid and don't call me names, I'll get creative with that.
    You're going to get creative with "Sparky"? OK, Sparky.

    So you think 78% of Americans are crazy, eh? Guess that makes you special.

    As for the whole AIDS things... people piffle monkeys yea, but what is the US governments most common testing animal?
    Considering God first distributed AIDS in Africa, I'll guess you're going to say Negroes.

    Outside of the Tuskeegee experiments, there's no evidence the US government used Negroes for experimentation with sexually-transmitted diseases.

    And nobody, except retards, thinks that humans got AIDS by having sex with monkeys. From a monkey bite, maybe, or from eating raw monkey brains (a delicacy in parts of Africa), but not from sex.

    Bestiality-obsessed freak. Once you "do" another man, your perverse lusts know no bounds, huh?

    Leave a comment:


  • ryan000smith, queerboy
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Hmmm, the majority of those people are bat shit crazy... your argument is invalid and don't call me names, I'll get creative with that.
    As for the whole AIDS things... people fuck monkeys yea, but what is the US governments most common testing animal?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    and 100% of Christians are Bat shit crazy... seems legit.
    78% of the American public identifies as Christian, including President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Kelli Clarkson.

    Wanna try that again, Sparky?

    At least we're not fantasizing about ridiculous AIDS conspiracy theories.

    Leave a comment:


  • ryan000smith, queerboy
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    and 100% of Christians (or "True Christians") are Bat shit crazy... seems legit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by Didymus Much View Post
    I thought you weren't quite as crazy as these people. I was wrong. Huh.
    I think this one's a special case, my God-hating friend.

    He thinks that HIS 'boyfriend' is going to be 100% monogamous forever, even though statistically, half of homosex relationships are 'open' and the rest are probably lying to their partners.

    Leave a comment:


  • ryan000smith, queerboy
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Duh, something like that doesn't just appear with no viral connection at all that it could have mutated from...

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Zaius
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    Plus we all know AIDS is man made...
    As much as I hate to disparage our primate cousins, I have to dispute this statement. We all know how man got the AIDS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Originally posted by ryan000smith View Post
    ...Plus we all know AIDS is man made...
    I thought you weren't quite as crazy as these people. I was wrong. Huh.

    Leave a comment:


  • ryan000smith, queerboy
    replied
    Re: not to argue, but to debate

    Oh so you are mentally retarded and have in fact, scored less than a double digit number on your IQ test? Because that would explain alot on why you all seem to people who assume everything... you know what they say about assumptions.
    But on a more serious and less childish note, my boyfriend and I have known each other for quite some time.. see the funny thing is, I have had two blood test for illnesses that I have contracted (pneumonia& a heavy flu) since he and I have started having any sexual interactions and I know he doesn't screw around because unlike you, I can trust my significant other. Unlike you I can trust mine to make good decisions, for I wouldn't go out with someone I didn't know better than that.
    On top of that, if almost every gay guy had AIDS and was so hell bent on spreading it, don't you think that AIDS numbers would still be sky rocketing?
    Plus we all know AIDS is man made...

    Leave a comment:

Working...