[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

Now you're just playing games. A flying thing with four people inside it (who obviously have faces, what with them being people and all) is not the same thing as a four-faced flying thing with wings.

[Adam Fag]

Re: Mars

Four-faced flying thing with wings, please. Man-made.

Ezekiel 1:4 like this


Ezekiel 1:5 like this




FIRMAMENT

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Mars

I don't want to waste space

If space is such a bountiful resource as you atheists insist, what are you afraid of wasting it for?

[Adam Fag]

Re: Mars

No, not what I call a pod. What they call a pod.

So, basically, anything you define as a "pod" is a pod.

Where are the faces? Where are the wings?

You wrote Can you point to even one space mission, from NASA, the USSR, the Chinese Space Agency, or anywhere else, that has employed "pods" as a means of landing? and so I did.

Physically, the GlobalFlyer aircraft somewhat resembles an enlarged, slender WWII airplane, the P-38, with twin tail booms mounted outboard of a smaller, central nacelle. The pressurized cockpit is mounted on the leading edge of the center pod and provides seven feet of space in which the pilot sits. Unlike the P-38, or similar twin-tail designs, the solitary turbofan engine is mounted atop the manned central fuselage, several feet behind the cockpit. The outboard tail booms instead contain fuel, and end in control surfaces which are not cross-connected.

I don't want to waste space but would you like to see some more?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Mars

Four-faced flying thing with wings, please. Man-made.

Still waiting.

[Adam Fag]

Re: Mars

Is this some sort of elaborate extended point of the ilk that science fiction is equally valid as the Bible? Because if it is, Adam, it's making you look like a bit of a jackass.
Posted via Mobile Device

No, not at all. One is made up, the other true.

We don't know what they saw but we can tell what it must have been and even they knew it was not God. They said so.

"God" and "not God" they were quite plain which was which and it's the "not God" bit that tells us what we want to know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSSUqbR0IA

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

Here's one >> link

So, basically, anything you define as a "pod" is a pod.

Where are the faces? Where are the wings?

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

The bottom line is that the moon landings were a cynical hoax, designed to support a view of the cosmos which completely contradicts Biblical facts. If you doubt that, you have only to look at the following series of images for proof:



And if you're too dense to make sense of what you're seeing, I suggest you educate yourself:

Who moved the mountain?

Looking at some of the 'LM and flag' images photographed near the end of one of the Apollo 17 EVAs, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (ALSJ) states:

AS17-134-20508-13 170:26:44 "This is one of several pictures that Jack took of the LM and flag on his way back from the ALSEP site for close-out at the end of EVA-3. The East Massif provides a backdrop."

As we examined these photos more closely (AS17-134-20511, 20512, and 20513) we noticed, to our utter amazement, that the US flag appeared to have been relocated between pictures.

Then, no doubt as part of an illusion to produce a convincing perspective change consistent with three different camera positions, the mountain backdrop moves even more drastically from shot to shot.

However, the LM stays in virtually the same orientation in all three pictures, as does a row of 10 or so little rocks located between the LM's feet and left of frame. In reality, such a minimal orientation change of the LM would require the distant mountain to change far less than the LM itself – not more...

[Adam Fag]

Re: Mars

There you go again with your talk of pods. Can you point to even one space mission, from NASA, the USSR, the Chinese Space Agency, or anywhere else, that has employed "pods" as a means of landing?

No, you can not.

Here's one >> link

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

Heck, I'll settle for a pod with one face, of any species.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Mars

Hi Faith Thanks for that, it was a help

"In the sky" as Job might have it there would be the main ship, for deep space use.

You can't fly these in air but you could push one off to the Moon or to Mars, or to a star like the Sun but you'd need pods to get down to earth. When seen in days of yore they'd get called all sorts of things but we know what they were, now. We make them too.

I'm still waiting for the 'pod' we make with four faces (only one of which is human, the other 3 being of animals) and wings.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

There you go again with your talk of pods. Can you point to even one space mission, from NASA, the USSR, the Chinese Space Agency, or anywhere else, that has employed "pods" as a means of landing?

No, you can not.

[Adam Fag]

Re: Mars

Virgin Galactic's Spaceship Two is quite real, but you'll note that it is not designed to voyage to the moon, and only travels in the upper reaches of the firmament. I suspect it's the first spaceship in history that wasn't a big, fat hoax.

Hi Faith Thanks for that, it was a help

"In the sky" as Job might have it there would be the main ship, for deep space use.

Here's one of ours.

You can't fly these in air but you could push one off to the Moon or to Mars, or to a star like the Sun but you'd need pods to get down to earth. When seen in days of yore they'd get called all sorts of things but we know what they were, now. We make them too.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Mars

This particular individual has extremely disturbing hair. You chose him intentionally to instill mindless fear in others.

He's also Greek. I'm more afraid of his Greekness than his hair. Greeks are really, really, really into sodomy.

[John Scopes]

Re: Mars

Right. Because only one of the four men per pod has a human face.

Do tell, where can I find a "pod" with four faces, only one of which is human, the other three being of animals, and with wings?

Admit it, all you can come up with is, "the Bible described something that flies, and now we have made things that fly, so that must be what the Bible meant!"



You need to stop watching the "History" channel's "Ancient Aliens" crap and get right with God instead of engaging in ridiculous fantasies.

This particular individual has extremely disturbing hair. You chose him intentionally to instill mindless fear in others.