[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: hey

Let's assume he is actually observing this site in a formal way. He would need a research methodology (otherwise he's just trolling). The research method of Participant is a valid scientific method for acquiring answers (vis a vis the Research Auestion; which could be 'are Christians pompous windbags?

Enjoy.

The good reverend is in the possession of more knowledge than a little girl who has just started to be inculcated into atheistical Satanism 'methods' could ever be.

If you could put your so called preconcieved a priori assumptions about the nature of reality to one side and accept Jesus Christ into your life you may just learn something.

Idiot.

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: hey

When have we had any discussions about research methods?

And it shows that you have just started your degree if you think joining a forum and complaining and antagonizing people for not sharing your beliefs is "Participant Observation". Go look it up and find out what it really is.

Maybe YOU understand what "argument" CountertoPotato is yammering about.

Let's assume he is actually observing this site in a formal way. He would need a research methodology (otherwise he's just trolling). The research method of Participant is a valid scientific method for acquiring answers (vis a vis the Research Auestion; which could be 'are Christians pompous windbags?

Enjoy.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: hey

If that's the case, then so far, he's guided me to atheism. What does that tell you?

It tells me you hate God, like all atheists, and prefer a life of sin.

That's not an argument. An argument is an attempt to persuade someone of a position.

No wonder I couldn't find your argument; you don't have one.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: hey

I've yet to see anyone on this forum who knows anything about research methods or any actual science. I've just started my degree and I bet I know more science than anyone here.

When have we had any discussions about research methods?

And it shows that you have just started your degree if you think joining a forum and complaining and antagonizing people for not sharing your beliefs is "Participant Observation". Go look it up and find out what it really is.

Maybe YOU understand what "argument" CountertoPotato is yammering about.

[counter345]

Re: hey

What argument? Seriously, what is your point? SPIT IT OUT.

If that's the case, then so far, he's guided me to Atheism. What does that tell you?

I've yet to see anyone on this forum who knows anything about research methods or any actual science. I've just started my degree and I bet I know more science than anyone here.

They think creationism is Science, which is laughable.

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: hey

What argument? Seriously, what is your point? SPIT IT OUT.

Maybe he just enjoys knowing he's smarter than the average brainwashed Christian.

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: hey

No, he's antagonizing and whining. That's not "gaining an intimate familiarity" by participating in our lives.

While you're stupid enough to reject God, you're not as stupid as CounterToPotato. You know better than to think he's following any sort of Participant Observation method.

Do you just think we're too stupid to know what that is?

I've yet to see anyone on this forum who knows anything about research methods or any actual science. I've just started my degree and I bet I know more science than anyone here.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: hey

Still avoiding the argument. That's cute.

What argument? Seriously, what is your point? SPIT IT OUT.

[counter345]

Re: hey

I didn't know you had a point. You are supposed to be "observing". Observers don't have a point, they observe.

Still avoiding the argument. That's cute.

No, he's antagonizing and whining.

In denial.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: hey

He's actually doing Participant Observation.

No, he's antagonizing and whining. That's not "gaining an intimate familiarity" by participating in our lives.

While you're stupid enough to reject God, you're not as stupid as CounterToPotato. You know better than to think he's following any sort of Participant Observation method.

Do you just think we're too stupid to know what that is?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: hey

He's actually doing Participant Observation.

Badly.

Yet another example of the habit of atheists in locking arms about things as long as they against God.

No doubt two teenaged perverts working together: how predictable.

YIC

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: hey

I didn't know you had a point. You are supposed to be "observing". Observers don't have a point, they observe.

He's actually doing Participant Observation.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: hey

And by the looks of things, you still haven't learned how to actually reply to the point of the argument.

I didn't know you had a point. You are supposed to be "observing". Observers don't have a point, they observe.

[counter345]

Re: hey

just have your rant.

I was answering someone's question with complete honesty.

That you still haven't learned that "atheist" is not a proper noun?

And by the looks of things, you still haven't learned how to actually reply to the point of the argument.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: hey

because I oppose the bible's morals (especially the Old Testament) with quite a contradiction, but most of all, I despise indoctrination.



You're making Jesus sound like a paedophile.



If that's the case, then so far, he's guided me to Atheism. What does that tell you?

Keep going. Your observations are fascinating, as always. I feel my faith tremble every time the mask slips. Let it go, friend, just have your rant.