[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Baby names?

I am sorry to "bump" this very unremarkable thread, but what do True Christian™ ladies and gentlemen think of the names given by the British prince and his dubious wife to their** new son?

I don't recall seeing either Archie or Harrison mentioned in the KJV (1611), do you?

My first impression upon hearing the name (by accident of course, I don't go seeking out information about these inbred, self-important Nazi mongrels on purpose) was "Gay, gay, GAY!!!" Assuming all Hell breaks loose and the old hag Elizabeth, Horseface Charlie, Prince Willy, his three whelps, and that negro-loving ginger boy Harry are all taken out by ISIS or the Irish or something, you poor English will be shackled with an uppity octoroon called King Archie. Can you imagine the indignity?



"Get on yo knees crackaz, Ize yo kang now."

My thoughts are, if you don't want to give your child a sensible name out of the KJV 1611 (like Mahershalalhashbaz), then at least name your child after a righteous Christian. That's why I named my second son George Bush Lukes after the man, the myth, the legend George W. Bush. Surely there are a few worthy, God-fearing Britons they could've named the boy after. Oswald Mosley, for example, or Jack the Ripper. But "Archie?" Really?

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Baby names?

Thank you, dear Sister Joanna, for bringing this to our attention. I had similar thoughts after I had read of the names of the baby, particularly Archie. Archie?!! What type of name is that for a so-called prince? Why not Jughead? He's the one who is wearing the crown!

Well quite. And if they wanted a stupid abbreviated name, they could have gone for Alfie. This would have satisfied both British history (Alfred the Great) and the comic-book brigade (Prince Harry lookalike Alfred E. Neuman).

[Isabella White]

Re: Baby names?

Well quite. And if they wanted a stupid abbreviated name, they could have gone for Alfie. This would have satisfied both British history (Alfred the Great) and the comic-book brigade (Prince Harry lookalike Alfred E. Neuman).

Exactly, dear Sister, exactly!!

[Phil Ander]

Re: Baby names?

I am sorry to "bump" this very unremarkable thread, but what do True Christian™ ladies and gentlemen think of the names given by the British prince and his dubious wife to their** new son?

I don't recall seeing either Archie or Harrison mentioned in the KJV (1611), do you? My dear maternal grandfather remembers a comic book from his childhood called Archie. If "Ms" Markle was reading boys' comic books that far back, the rumors are probably true. Is Archie even a real name, or is it like Spiderman? As for Harrison, they might as well have called him Indiana!

By the way, has anyone any suggestions for my impending baby/babies, due either at the end of next month or in July or maybe the beginning of August - math is not my strong point, but it doesn't matter as God will decide. We are praying for another son, or possibly two if we are blessed with a fourth set of boy twins. So far, God has only decided otherwise once, and I thank Him for that kindness every day as Hannah (10) is a useful help meet and will make an excellent wife one day.

** if indeed it is theirs - rumor suggests otherwise.

I hope that God blesses you with another twinset. My humble name suggestion would be Zeke and Elmer, or perhaps Phil (snr) and Phil (jnr) if nothing else comes to mind.


Phil

[Isabella White]

Re: Baby names?

My first impression upon hearing the name (by accident of course, I don't go seeking out information about these inbred, self-important Nazi mongrels on purpose) was "Gay, gay, GAY!!!" Assuming all Hell breaks loose and the old hag Elizabeth, Horseface Charlie, Prince Willy, his three whelps, and that negro-loving ginger boy Harry are all taken out by ISIS or the Irish or something, you poor English will be shackled with an uppity octoroon called King Archie. Can you imagine the indignity?


"Get on yo knees crackaz, Ize yo kang now."

My thoughts are, if you don't want to give your child a sensible name out of the KJV 1611 (like Mahershalalhashbaz), then at least name your child after a righteous Christian. That's why I named my second son George Bush Lukes after the man, the myth, the legend George W. Bush. Surely there are a few worthy, God-fearing Britons they could've named the boy after. Oswald Mosley, for example, or Jack the Ripper. But "Archie?" Really?

Very true, dear Brother Lukes, and I thank you for bringing that to our attention. Your statement reminds me of another fact: we can be so glad of our freedom of speech here in the blessed . Over in England, a journalist with the BBC has been fired for something he shared, about the new royal baby. I'm surprised the old Queen didn't send him to the Tower to have his head chopped off! Below, you will see the "offensive" message that resulted in the termination of the journalist. A blessed day to you, dear Brother. Sincerely, Isabella W.

[handmaiden]

Re: Baby names?

I do wish that the man wouldn't apologize like that. We KNOW that he wouldn't have used that photo to mark any other Royal birth, because he had a chance to do so just last year. (Also, a couple of years before that, and a couple of years before that that.)

There was simply no need to use the chimpy photo before this latest royal birth because William and Kate's children are fully white. Mr. Baker knows that this royal baby is different and he chose to mark the event in a significant way.

Baker knew full well what he was doing and apologizing by saying that it was somehow not intentional is a falsehood. The Lord does not appreciate lies. He does appreciate keeping the various races of His creation clearly marked and separate, as He has chosen to illustrate through many, many Bible commands that are too numerous to enumerate here.

So, Danny Baker, in the future, Do Not Lie. You must own up to your beliefs and stand firm with them. That is certainly what a True Christian™ would do.


P.S. If the baby begins walking and climbing about in the next few days, you know fully well that the press will never be allowed to hear of it.


P.S.S. Do you think that a picture of an orangutan might have been more appropriate?

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Baby names?

I'm just wondering who that couple are - the ones leaving the maternity hospital with their chimp baby. They look like QE2's late parents, but they didn't (officially) have any sons. Maybe he was kept in the attic, or put in an asylum like the Queen's first cousins Nerissa and Katherine?

I hope that God blesses you with another twinset. My humble name suggestion would be Zeke and Elmer, or perhaps Phil (snr) and Phil (jnr) if nothing else comes to mind.

Thank you, Brother. We already have a Zeke (Ezekiel, obviously). Sadly there is no Elmer in the KJV (1611), but Philip is a definite possibility. The trouble is, Phil the Greek is likely to stagger off on his plunge into any day now, and I would hate any suspicion to arise that we had named a child in his honor.

One thing I will not be doing again is allowing the children's brothers to have any input. Poor little Eliphelet! I still can't believe that his father allowed it.

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Baby names?

Over in England, a journalist with the BBC has been fired for something he shared, about the new royal baby. I'm surprised the old Queen didn't send him to the Tower to have his head chopped off! Below, you will see the "offensive" message that resulted in the termination of the journalist.

I highly doubt that a fake news journalist working for a leftist propaganda network with the unbelievably cuckish name of "BBC" would dare say anything even remotely negative about a colored, ever. However, if he did, it wouldn't shock me in the least that his racist attack would take such an anti-Christian, EVILutionist form as comparing a negro to a chimp. We True Christians know that the Hamites are simply normal people who have been cursed by God to be ugly, smelly, criminals, NOT some kind of lesser evolved monkeys like all Darwinists think because they're so racist and hate-filled.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Baby names?

Over in England, a journalist with the BBC has been fired for something he shared, about the new royal baby.

Not so much a journalist, dear Sister Issy, more what they call a "presenter". That means he hosts the type of phone-in radio show where lunatics call up to complain that the local Indian and Chinese restaurants are serving foreign food, or that their neighbor (or his dog) is an alien.


One of my boys (Nathanael, 6, or as he insists "7 in August" ) called him up recently to point out that these so-called aliens were almost certainly demons. Nate did well to make absolutely no comment on Baker's weight or his vulgar, lower-class accent. In fact, it was all going swimmingly until Baker mispronounced hyperbole as hyper-bowl. Nate (quite reasonably and politely) corrected him and was immediately cut off. So disappointing for him.

[Isabella White]

Re: Baby names?

I'm just wondering who that couple are - the ones leaving the maternity hospital with their chimp baby. They look like QE2's late parents, but they didn't (officially) have any sons. Maybe he was kept in the attic, or put in an asylum like the Queen's first cousins Nerissa and Katherine?

Goodness gracious, Sister Joanna! I had the same thought. That couple does look somewhat like King George VI & Queen Elizabeth, and I wouldn't be surprised if it IS the King & Queen, in disguise. As for the chimp baby, wasn't Princess Margaret a bit of a hand full at times? Considering how her name kept popping up in the news years ago, due to one scandal and another, I wouldn't be surprised if she was difficult from Day One and that the couple had to keep her (and themselves) under wraps from the prying cameras! A blessed day to you, Dear Sister. Sincerely, Isabella W.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Baby names?

The child really does not matter. I'd call him 'It'.

While it is born to an American female, she is a lowly negress. She is married to a souless ginger.

The little bastard is so unwanted they did not give it a title. I expect to see headlines in the Sun talking about his rectal romps in the seedy back alleys of London.

Maybe it can be put to service in the military to look for land mines.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Baby names?

Maybe it can be put to service in the military to look for land mines.

It's in the blood - the kid's paternal grandmother was very keen on looking for landmines.

[BrotherLarry]

Re: Baby names?

I don’t have any opinion about the baby born to Harry and what’s her name. I just long for days to return when names were special and oh so pretty. For instance my great great grandmother on daddy’s side was Garnet Jewel Mary Pureheart. Her sister was Chrysanthemum Rose Elizabeth Pureheart Jones. My mother’s grandmother on her father’s side was Manahawkin Hilton Esther Carrington. She was named for where she was conceived. Our maid’s name after we fired Ol Essie for stealing peanuts was Ol Hattie. Both were old. Hattie didn’t steal but she got fired for being uppity. Always trying to learn how to read.

[DolliMoans]

Re: Baby names?

I am thinking of a new name for my soon-to-be, yet belated unborn son. I am thinking: Cock
Yes, Cock Moans. Like the roster, only this little buster is determined to be late, rather than set for an early rise! One cocky little fellow.