I wear pants and I'm a girl...I don't think it's wrong unless they look like men's pants
Deuteronomy 22:5The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God
God makes it very clear that women are not to be in pants or any type of clothing that is for a man.
I truly Suggest that you Pick up a Copy of the King James v1611 and read it!
It sounds like you are on a path to Eternal Damnation!
It has nothing to do with what you think is "OK", It has everything to do with WHAT GOD SAYS IS OK.
What is wrong with wearing pants? I have no qualms about wearing my power suit with shoulder pads when I'm going up against some would-be male oppressor in a debate. This is just more evidence that the Bible was created by a bunch of sexist pigs who wanted to provide authority for their bigoted ways.
Personally, I don't mind spying a young woman in tight jeans that shows off her curves. <---racist smiley, should be brown-skinned
Oh, deary me. Young black woman, you are doomed to burn in hell. Are you not aware that shoulder pads are a total faux pas - that style went out in the late 80's.
What is wrong with wearing pants? I have no qualms about wearing my power suit with shoulder pads when I'm going up against some would-be male oppressor in a debate.
Latrina, what's wrong with your wearing pants is that God hates it. You admit that it fits perfectly with your lifestyle choice of backtalking to men instead of submitting to them, so how good can it be?
What is wrong with wearing pants? I have no qualms about wearing my power suit with shoulder pads when I'm going up against some would-be male oppressor in a debate. This is just more evidence that the Bible was created by a bunch of sexist pigs who wanted to provide authority for their bigoted ways.
Personally, I don't mind spying a young woman in tight jeans that shows off her curves. <---racist smiley, should be brown-skinned
You have to understand, this Dawkins person is a empty headed brit who spent what little time he was in school on hanging around around the boys showers. As I understand it, he is in an apprentice program, learning how to shovel coal. I spoke with his mentor, who said in another nine years or so, the kid might have it. Way to go!
Originally posted by richard dawkins idiot sonView Post
ok first of all its where, not were, and second of all...i have used facts...words written in a bible, as much as you may want it to be are just that, ink on paper, nothing more...
First of all, it's "Okay, first of all, it's where, not were. And second of all, I have used facts,". If you're going to criticize someone, young man, I would think that you would at least do it with proper punctuation and sentence structure.
Originally posted by richard dawkins idiot sonView Post
if being out of favour with god is unforgivable then you using an internet forum bought to you by the art of science, then you, and by definition all who use this thread...are unforgivably out of favour wit god...thats what you call inescable logic
unless of course god created the internet, wirse, web based programming, software for web browing, graphical user interfaces, modems, fibre optics...shall i go on???
And who created man???
May I ask you young man, how old are you?
And why do you insist that this forum is "backward"?
Just because your new age morals are as they are, the world is on a path, or should I shall say highway to Doom.
Originally posted by richard dawkins idiot sonView Post
ok first of all its where, not were, and second of all...i have used facts...words written in a bible, as much as you may want it to be are just that, ink on paper, nothing more...
Those words are key to Christian doctrine are they not? By your logic one does not need to understand Newton of Ptolemy to understand planetary motion.
ok first of all its where, not were, and second of all...i have used facts...words written in a bible, as much as you may want it to be are just that, ink on paper, nothing more...
Originally posted by richard dawkins idiot sonView Post
never actually played it nobar king, and its actually quite interesting to see a self professed intelligent man quail before a reasoned argument based on fact
Leave a comment: