What I'd like to know is why the brits waited until now to announce the codgers death. Didn't he die years ago and they just kept him propped up on a broom stick like a mannequin?
Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. TooleView Post
This was not enough for conservative pundit Ben Harris-Quinney, probably Baron or Viscount, who accused the BBC of "prompting a response" by having a complaints form.
Did he use the complaints form to complain about the complaints form?
After solid 24/7 coverage following the death of celebrity husband and hospital regular Prince Philip, the BBC was inundated with complaints about interrupted programming. Their solution? Take down the complaint form.
Ratings plummeted after decision to axe Friday night favourites following announcement of duke’s death
This was not enough for conservative pundit Ben Harris-Quinney, probably Baron or Viscount, who accused the BBC of "prompting a response" by having a complaints form. The BBC responded by whimpering to itself quietly and promising not to be such a bad broadcaster and to fly more Union Jacks.
her maths math skills weren't entirely up to scratch
It's rather fortunate that she made a prosperous marriage then. Because as a rule, women who are unable to understand the sort of simple arithmetic one teaches to the under-8s end up as hairdressers or worse. And apparently she couldn't do that either.
Still, at least she wasn't reduced to whoring herself around cable TV networks. Her husband isn't ginger, and her future employment prospects as a state-funded smiler and waver are promising. All in all she has done pretty well.
Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. TooleView Post
SPOILER: it's a car.
In addition to being completely droll, this story fails to make the most important point. Nobody should try to ease the burdens of childbirth, because that is contrary to God's plan!
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. Genesis 3:16
This one's not the BBC but close (The Guardian). The "news" report:
It's been a strange trip. Four years ago, who would've thought Biden might win Iowa? In 2016, Trump won the state by nine percentage points. Now it is in play – and a bellwether for the country
The facts:
Donald Trump 53.2%
Joe Biden 45%
It's proof all the liberal stream media are liars. Now back to the BBC.
I mean, it's well-meaning but you have forgotten to account for ethnic status. I'm thinking of how many Mexicans live in a 1bed studio compared to decent white folk. There ought to be a cap based on Mexicans per square foot.
Are believers even allowed in their Bible Colleges, training for their clergy?
I made it a minute and a half. Once he said the virus was indeed of Chinese origin and she said she'd like to pay more taxes instead of saying, "Yes dear," it was all over.
UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE - AN IDEA
Why not determine how many voters are in a household, sons, domestic staff, chauffeurs, menial workers, their sons, wives, daughters and so on then allocate the property owner that many votes?
EXAMPLE ..4 SONS ..1 DOMESTIC m ..2 DOMESTIC f ..1 CHAUFFEUR ..1 MENIAL m ..1 MENIAL f ..3 THEIR SONS ..4 WIVES (aggregate) ..2 DAUGHTERS (aggregate) 19= weighting ..1 OWNER 20TOTAL VOTES ALLOCATED
This avoids the possibility of a communist wife or homosexual gardener saying that yes, they'll vote as directed but then doing something else, something likely to bring down ruin on everyone. It happened in France and they didn't have suffrage at all!
A weighted ballot of this type also avoids the problem of employees more generally. If they run their own establishment (a factory manager, say) then they get a weighted ballot. If they're a starving artist living in a garret, they don't own property and would be covered by the garret owner. If you have someone who comes in (cleaner, maybe) they can't claim not to belong in your weighting calculation. Does this make sense or have I got it all wrong?
Leave a comment: