Baptists decide against database

[A Mad Dog]

Southern Baptists decide against pedophilia database



Facing calls to curb child sex abuse within its churches, in June the Southern Baptist Convention — the largest U.S. religious body after the Catholic Church — urged local hiring committees to conduct federal background checks but rejected a proposal to create a central database of staff and clergy who have been either convicted of or indicted on charges of molesting minors. The SBC decided against such a database in part because its principle of local autonomy means it cannot compel individual churches to report any information. And while the headlines regarding churches and pedophilia remain largely focused on Catholic parishes, the lack of hierarchical structure and systematized record-keeping in most Protestant churches makes it harder not only for church leaders to impose standards, but for interested parties to track allegations of abuse.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2008/top10/article/0,30583,1855948_1861760_1862212,00.html

This should be an interesting discussion.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Well that's the SBC for you. We broke off with them years ago. They coddle queers.

Are you trying to start trouble, boy? Because God hates those who sew seeds of dissent.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Baptists decide against database

I have just done a search on our Godly LBC database to check our situation.

 
SELECT * FROM TRUECHRISTIANS TC
WHERE 
TC.SEXOFFENDER = 'Y'
OR
TC.CHILDMOLESTER = 'Y'
ORDER BY
TC.NAME, TC.FIRSTNAME
 
Result :  0 rows affected.

Case closed I'd say.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Baptists decide against database

I say the only database we need is a list of all the little harlots and twinks that have been dressing immodestly and seducing all those innocent clergymen.

With photos. And addresses.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Baptists decide against database

And while the headlines regarding churches and pedophilia remain largely focused on Catholic parishes, the lack of hierarchical structure and systematized record-keeping in most Protestant churches makes it harder not only for church leaders to impose standards, but for interested parties to track allegations of abuse.

How difficult is it to impose a standard of, "Thou shalt not rape children"?

The SBC is a bunch of hypocrites and perverts.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2008/top10/article/0,30583,1855948_1861760_1862212,00.html

I say the only database we need is a list of all the little harlots and twinks that have been dressing immodestly and seducing all those innocent clergymen.

With photos. And addresses.

And bedtimes.

We need to make sure they are safely tucked in at bedtime, not out running about where perverts and atheists lurk.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Ezekial wrote,

Well that's the SBC for you.

Maybe so.

We broke off with them years ago.

Did you break off of them because of their gay agenda?

Are you trying to start trouble, boy?

No. I'm just trying to get to the truth of the matter. That also means that I'm a truth seeker in Faith as well.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Did you break off of them because of their gay agenda?

Landover and other Independent Fundamentalist Baptists (like my church in North Salem, IN) broke with the SBC years ago over alcohol. They declared consuming alcohol of any amount to be a sin . . . Jesus turned water into wine and drank it Himself, for Heaven's sake! That's tantamount to calling Jesus a sinner!

The gay agenda of the SBC came to light long after.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Landover and other Independent Fundamentalist Baptists (like my church in North Salem, IN) broke with the SBC years ago over alcohol. They declared consuming alcohol of any amount to be a sin . . . Jesus turned water into wine and drank it Himself, for Heaven's sake! That's tantamount to calling Jesus a sinner!

The gay agenda of the SBC came to light long after.

I agree with you. It is not a sin to consume alcohol. Just getting drunk is a sin.

[Hymie Goldberg]

Re: Baptists decide against database

I agree with you. It is not a sin to consume alcohol. Just getting drunk is a sin.

So is getting an altar-boy drunk a sin, or do you have to shtupp him as well?

Hymie

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Baptists decide against database

So is getting an altar-boy drunk a sin, or do you have to shtupp him as well?

Hymie

Yes, it is a sin. What does the word "shtupp" mean? Thanks

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Baptists decide against database

What does the word "shtupp" mean?

Probably something to do with killing Jesus.

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Probably something to do with killing Jesus.

Maybe but would you say that we are all responsible for the death of Our Savior since He died for our sins and we are all sinners?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Baptists decide against database

Maybe but would you say that we are all responsible for the death of Our Savior since He died for our sins and we are all sinners?

The joos killed Him. Don't try and blame True Christians(tm).

[A Mad Dog]

Re: Baptists decide against database

But would you or would you not say that He was crucified because of our sins?