X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Learning Retardation Girl to have baby taken away! Praise Jesus!

    THIS story brings tears of joy to my face! Praise Jesus!

    First this filthy Godless retard was prevented from getting married - NOW she's going to have her child taken away from her - BECAUSE OF HER RETARDATIONS ! Glory!

    See, even in the Godless cesspool of the UK, they know what REAL rights retards have - NONE WHATSOEVER!!!

    Social services 'to take baby from teenager deemed too stupid to marry'

    A mother-to-be, who was banned from marrying after social workers said she is not intelligent enough, is to have her baby taken away immediately after giving birth.

    Kerry Robertson, 17, who has mild learning difficulties, has been told that she will not be allowed to bring up her own child, who she has already named Ben.

    Last month Miss Robertson was prevented from marrying her fiancé Mark McDougall, 25, after council officials claimed that she “did not understand the implications of getting married”.

    She has now been warned that she will only be allowed a few hours with her baby, which is due in January, before it is taken into foster care.
    After hearing the news, Miss Robertson, of Dunfermline, Fife, who is 26 weeks pregnant, said: “I couldn't believe it. I am so upset – I can't stop crying.”

    Mr McDougall, an artist, said he wants to take on full responsibility for his son but claims that he is powerless because he is not married to Miss Robertson.

    He added: “Social Services are ruining our lives. As we are not married – because social workers would not let us marry – it seems I have no rights as a dad at all.

    “Kerry's gran is trying to apply for custody of Ben but social services have already told us it is unlikely she will be successful. We feel helpless.”
    The extraordinary case first came to light last month when the couple’s wedding was halted 48 hours before Miss Robertson was due to walk up the aisle.

    Under Scottish law, a registrar may refuse to marry a couple if they believe one or both the parties lack the mental capacity to understand what the institution of marriage is about.

    In a highly unusual step, Dunfermline Register Office refused to sanction the marriage after Fife council wrote a letter of objection.

    Miss Robertson was brought up by her grandmother from the age of nine months because her parents were unable to look after her and her welfare has since been overseen by the council’s social workers.

    She met Mr McDougall, from Arbroath, in January and the couple planned to get married after Miss Robertson became pregnant.

    Two days before the ceremony, two social workers visited their flat and told them that the marriage was illegal because of Miss Robertson’s learning difficulties.

    The service and reception for 20 guests had to be called off despite the couple having already bought rings and a wedding dress.

    At the time, Miss Robertson said: “I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together. I love Mark and I want to get married to him.”

    Mr McDougall added: “Despite arguing that we loved one another and didn't want our baby to be born to unwed parents, they would not budge. It's a nightmare.”

    He claims that social services have exaggerated the extent of Miss Robertson’s learning difficulties and that she is hoping to go back to college to catch up academically.

    The council said it does not comment on individual cases. But Stephen Moore, the council's executive director of social services, said: “Much of the work we do is governed by legislation. Complex decisions are made that balance risk and welfare while supporting people at times of personal or family need.

    "We will always work with people for the best outcome for all involved.”
    In May it was disclosed that Rachel Pullen, 24, had her three-year-old daughter taken away from her by social services when she was six months old after Nottingham City Council officials deemed her too stupid to look after the child
    Carefully notice where it says :

    "council officials claimed that she “did not understand the implications of getting married”."

    At the time, Miss Robertson said: “I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together.”

    WRONG, RETARD! Marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman BEFORE AND IN THE EYES OF GOD. It is a Christian union, and as such you should be a Bible believing Jesus loving True Christian to be allowed to enter into it.

    It is NOT just 'two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together'. Here's a hint, not one word mentioned about God or Jesus in her braindead illiterate babblings. Too DUMB to believe in God? Too stupid to understand the Bible? Too retarded to accept Jesus as your Lord and personal Savior, and comprehend what it actually means?? Then you shouldn't be able to get married. Praise Jesus for Social Services actions!

    I can't wait for this fornicating 'tard to have her babies taken away from her. Hopefully they are given to a good Christian home, where there are given a REAL mother. One who doesn't spit-up and drool all over them like some pathetic gimp. Glory to Heaven!

  • #2
    Re: Learning Retardation Girl to have baby taken away! Praise Jes

    Originally posted by Rachel_Pierce View Post
    At the time, Miss Robertson said: “I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together.”

    WRONG, RETARD! Marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman BEFORE AND IN THE EYES OF GOD. It is a Christian union, and as such you should be a Bible believing Jesus loving True Christian to be allowed to enter into it.
    If that's what she thinks, then she really is learning-disabled, as well as salvation-disabled. Let's review some things that God says about marriage. Do these two sound as though they want to spend the rest of their lives together?

    Deut. 22:28-29: If a man find a damsel [that is] a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

    How about the woman in the following situation?

    Exodus 21:7-8: And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her.

    What the two people want is not the deciding factor, and what the woman wants is not a consideration at all, since she's just a woman. The council correctly understands something that we True Conservatives™ have been saying all along, namely, that the government is a better judge of who should get married than are the couple themselves. In fact, Mr. McDougall needs to pay up to the tard's father, or in this case, since the tard's father has abdicated his responsibility, to the council in loco parentis:

    Exodus 22:16-17: And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife. If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.
    This church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.

    Questions to ask liberal "Christians"Things that the Bible doesn't sayTolerance

    sigpic

    Comment

    Working...
    X