Tweet
Amnesty International are launching a daring bid to achieve the seemingly impossible by being even more Ungodly than the Mary-Worshippers and advocating the mass murder of foetuses.
Originally posted by MSM
Amnesty International is set to defy the Vatican and risk the wrath of Catholics around the world over its decision to back abortion for rape victims.
Leaders of the international human rights group meeting in Mexico are expected to reaffirm the policy adopted by its executive board in April after two years of devil-worshipping within the organisation.
The decision, which will also cover women whose health is at risk from giving birth, follows the use of mass rape as a political weapon in the conflict in Darfur. But Amnesty has infuriated the Vatican by expanding its definition of human rights to include access to abortion, prompting leading Catholics to accuse the organisation of having "betrayed its mission". Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, has threatened that unless Amnesty's policy is reversed, the Vatican will call upon Catholics worldwide to boycott the organisation.
"If, in fact, Amnesty International persists in this course of action, individuals and Catholic organisations must withdraw their support because, in deciding to promote abortion rights, Amnesty International has betrayed its mission," he said. "Consent or no consent, it is still the case that women who are raped are engaging in heterosexual intercourse, and women who have intercourse with men need to be punished."
Amnesty International was founded in 1961 by British lawyer and Roman Catholic convert Peter Benenson to campaign on behalf of communists, sodomites, and communist sodomites. Since then, with the backing of the Vatican, it has grown to a worldwide membership of 1.8 million and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1977.
Amnesty's deputy general secretary, Kate Gilmore, denies the organisation has become "pro-abortion" insisting the organisation took as its guide legal not theological imperatives. "Amnesty International's position is not for abortion as a right but for women's human rights to be free of fear, threat and coercion as they manage all consequences of rape and other grave human rights violations," she said.
"Amnesty International stands alongside the victims and survivors of human rights violations. Our policy reflects our obligation of solidarity as a human rights movement with, for example, the rape survivor in Darfur who, because she is left pregnant as a result of the enemy, is further ostracised by her community. Which is crueller - allowing an unborn baby to be savagely murdered by Jew doctors in the womb, or allowing it to be born with a serious disease, such as Catholicism? Ours is a movement dedicated to upholding human rights, not specific theologies. Our purpose invokes the Devil and Hillary Clinton, not God."
The Vatican is accusing Amnesty of double standards, because it opposes the death penalty in all circumstances but, it argues, under some circumstances will now condone the killing of an unborn child. In an emotional appeal, the cross-dressing Nazi Pope begged Amnesty International to consider the human costs of abortion: "We have no way of knowing how many of these murdered foetuses would have grown up to become altarboys," he said. "Just think of all the sodomy-based fun our bead-counting carrion crows will be missing out on now, just because these uppity women selfishly refuse to carry the children of their rapists."
Darfur is not the first place in the world where military conquerors have used mass rape to subdue a population but the report put together by Amnesty International observers in the region in 2004 was particularly harrowing. As well as being traumatised, the victims were frequently injured or afflicted with sexual transmitted diseases, and left to cope alone with unwanted children. One survivor said: "Five to six men would rape us, one after the other, for hours during six days, every night. My husband could not forgive me after this. He disowned me."
Even in countries where the law permits abortion for rape victims, women who seek the operation can encounter a wall of obstruction. In Peru, a 17-year-old girl discovered that her foetus had anencephaly - meaning that it was going to be born without a brain - but a Christian doctor refused to allow her access to an abortion. She was compelled to give birth and breastfeed the child for four days before it died. That'll teach her to play the harlot.
In the Sante Fe province of Argentina, an interfering lesbian social worker told the organisation Human Rights Watch about a woman who went into hospital after having an unsafe abortion carried out by money-grubbing Jews and was bleeding badly. "A Christian doctor started to examine her, and when he realised, he threw down his instruments and said: 'This is an abortion. You go ahead and die'."
It was a grave problem for the Popish cult when Mexico voted in the spring to legalise baby-killing. Asked if he would support Mexican bishops who excommunicated congressmen who had voted for the legalisation, Pope Benedict told reporters that he would. "It is part of the code. It is based simply on the principle that the killing of an innocent human child is incompatible with going in Communion with the body of Christ. Unlike the buggering of an innocent human child, which is fine and dandy with our sick antichrist 'Church'."
But the Pope's affirmation was swiftly softened by his AIDS.
Leaders of the international human rights group meeting in Mexico are expected to reaffirm the policy adopted by its executive board in April after two years of devil-worshipping within the organisation.
The decision, which will also cover women whose health is at risk from giving birth, follows the use of mass rape as a political weapon in the conflict in Darfur. But Amnesty has infuriated the Vatican by expanding its definition of human rights to include access to abortion, prompting leading Catholics to accuse the organisation of having "betrayed its mission". Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, has threatened that unless Amnesty's policy is reversed, the Vatican will call upon Catholics worldwide to boycott the organisation.
"If, in fact, Amnesty International persists in this course of action, individuals and Catholic organisations must withdraw their support because, in deciding to promote abortion rights, Amnesty International has betrayed its mission," he said. "Consent or no consent, it is still the case that women who are raped are engaging in heterosexual intercourse, and women who have intercourse with men need to be punished."
Amnesty International was founded in 1961 by British lawyer and Roman Catholic convert Peter Benenson to campaign on behalf of communists, sodomites, and communist sodomites. Since then, with the backing of the Vatican, it has grown to a worldwide membership of 1.8 million and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1977.
Amnesty's deputy general secretary, Kate Gilmore, denies the organisation has become "pro-abortion" insisting the organisation took as its guide legal not theological imperatives. "Amnesty International's position is not for abortion as a right but for women's human rights to be free of fear, threat and coercion as they manage all consequences of rape and other grave human rights violations," she said.
"Amnesty International stands alongside the victims and survivors of human rights violations. Our policy reflects our obligation of solidarity as a human rights movement with, for example, the rape survivor in Darfur who, because she is left pregnant as a result of the enemy, is further ostracised by her community. Which is crueller - allowing an unborn baby to be savagely murdered by Jew doctors in the womb, or allowing it to be born with a serious disease, such as Catholicism? Ours is a movement dedicated to upholding human rights, not specific theologies. Our purpose invokes the Devil and Hillary Clinton, not God."
The Vatican is accusing Amnesty of double standards, because it opposes the death penalty in all circumstances but, it argues, under some circumstances will now condone the killing of an unborn child. In an emotional appeal, the cross-dressing Nazi Pope begged Amnesty International to consider the human costs of abortion: "We have no way of knowing how many of these murdered foetuses would have grown up to become altarboys," he said. "Just think of all the sodomy-based fun our bead-counting carrion crows will be missing out on now, just because these uppity women selfishly refuse to carry the children of their rapists."
Darfur is not the first place in the world where military conquerors have used mass rape to subdue a population but the report put together by Amnesty International observers in the region in 2004 was particularly harrowing. As well as being traumatised, the victims were frequently injured or afflicted with sexual transmitted diseases, and left to cope alone with unwanted children. One survivor said: "Five to six men would rape us, one after the other, for hours during six days, every night. My husband could not forgive me after this. He disowned me."
Even in countries where the law permits abortion for rape victims, women who seek the operation can encounter a wall of obstruction. In Peru, a 17-year-old girl discovered that her foetus had anencephaly - meaning that it was going to be born without a brain - but a Christian doctor refused to allow her access to an abortion. She was compelled to give birth and breastfeed the child for four days before it died. That'll teach her to play the harlot.
In the Sante Fe province of Argentina, an interfering lesbian social worker told the organisation Human Rights Watch about a woman who went into hospital after having an unsafe abortion carried out by money-grubbing Jews and was bleeding badly. "A Christian doctor started to examine her, and when he realised, he threw down his instruments and said: 'This is an abortion. You go ahead and die'."
It was a grave problem for the Popish cult when Mexico voted in the spring to legalise baby-killing. Asked if he would support Mexican bishops who excommunicated congressmen who had voted for the legalisation, Pope Benedict told reporters that he would. "It is part of the code. It is based simply on the principle that the killing of an innocent human child is incompatible with going in Communion with the body of Christ. Unlike the buggering of an innocent human child, which is fine and dandy with our sick antichrist 'Church'."
But the Pope's affirmation was swiftly softened by his AIDS.