Scientists Confirm What We Already Knew

[Des]

Scientists are always inventing studies in order to obtain trillions of our hard earned tax dollars. More often than not, these 'studies' are either pointless (Mating Habits of the East Nile Dung Beetle) or common sense (Peanut Butter as Lubricant for Anal Sex?). So I was not surprised to read that scientists have once again spent trillions on a study to confirm a fact any one of us could have told them for a nickel. Namely, all lesbians are ugly and undesirable.

Thank you, Mister scientist. We were all well aware of this simple fact, but thank you all the same for dipping into our pockets in order to confirm it. Enjoy the gravy train while you can, you pocket protector wearing geeks, because The Trump will put an end to your socialist money stealing shenanigans once and for all when he is in office.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Scientists Confirm What We Already Knew

Scientists are always inventing studies in order to obtain trillions of our hard earned tax dollars. More often than not, these 'studies' are either pointless (Mating Habits of the East Nile Dung Beetle) or common sense (Peanut Butter as Lubricant for Anal Sex?). So I was not surprised to read that scientists have once again spent trillions on a study to confirm a fact any one of us could have told them for a nickel. Namely, all lesbians are ugly and undesirable.

Thank you, Mister scientist. We were all well aware of this simple fact, but thank you all the same for dipping into our pockets in order to confirm it. Enjoy the gravy train while you can, you pocket protector wearing geeks, because The Trump will put an end to your socialist money stealing shenanigans once and for all when he is in office.

Indeed, Brother Des!

Atheist science always needs to produce "results" and "peer-reviewed papers" to secure future funding to mock Jesus even further. That is why they come up with research ideas that are so simple that the results are inevitable and - Lo! - they have their hypotheses confirmed.

This is very different from Creation Science where we start with facts (Jesus and the Bible) and try to uncover how this is reflected in the Created world. For instance, in this case the atheist scholars have missed a crucial auxiliary hypothesis that should also be tested.

• All homersexual women are ugly and undesirable (the known fact, thus, redundant as a hypothesis)
• Are there non-lesbian women who are also ugly and undesirable and what does this mean for begetting? *

The Bible is ambiguous. We have the Shulamite who was perhaps less than perfect regarding her outlook:

Song of Solomon 6:6
Thy teeth are as a flock of sheep which go up from the washing, whereof every one beareth twins, and there is not one barren among them.




That does not seem to comely. Thus, ugly (perhaps) but NOT undesirable. Hence, a study in Creation Science would be required. I urge all Brethren to come forth with their personal experiences and after gathering some personal data we can conclude the issue.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

* Yes, there are, as I can testify during the time of the month when our household is ovulating and conjugal relations have to take place. For begetting it means that you just have to work harder to please Jesus and achieve the penetration required.