X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Victoria's Secret Denied

    The sex Victoria's Secret was trying to sell when it wanted to corrupt the women of Freehold has not been working. So, the company is switching it marketing. It's wants women to buy its underwear because it makes them "powerful."

    If there is anything worse than selling sex it is selling women as equals to men. This new marketing by Victoria's Secret is just another of Satan's bag of tricks.

    Here is what I have to say to Victoria's Secret: Don't renew your attempt to sell sin in Freehold. The answer is still NO.

    Victoria’s Secret Swaps Angels for ‘What Women Want.’ Will They Buy It? - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
    Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Victoria's Secret Denied

      Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
      The sex Victoria's Secret was trying to sell when it wanted to corrupt the women of Freehold has not been working. So, the company is switching it marketing. It's wants women to buy its underwear because it makes them "powerful."

      If there is anything worse than selling sex it is selling women as equals to men. This new marketing by Victoria's Secret is just another of Satan's bag of tricks.

      Here is what I have to say to Victoria's Secret: Don't renew your attempt to sell sin in Freehold. The answer is still NO.

      Victoria’s Secret Swaps Angels for ‘What Women Want.’ Will They Buy It? - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
      Well, we all know who is behind anything that they sell in their sinful shops: SATAN. I must say: in my day, we did not talk about such personal things. Unmentionables remained either in the lady's dresser drawer, or on her person, but never to be seen in shop windows, for all the world to see! As for Victoria trying to sell her seductive secrets in Freehold, she might as well know this, and know it now: The will not stand for this! He will not tolerate it!

      I John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world."
      (Mrs.) Isabella White

      Hebrews 10:19 " Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the of "

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Isabella White View Post
        Re: Victoria's Secret Denied
        Well, we all know who is behind anything that they sell in their sinful shops: SATAN. I must say: in my day, we did not talk about such personal things. Unmentionables remained either in the lady's dresser drawer, or on her person, but never to be seen in shop windows, for all the world to see! As for Victoria trying to sell her seductive secrets in Freehold, she might as well know this, and know it now:

        I John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world."
        The celebration of Baby Jesus is a perfect time to bring up the most important of forces facing mankind. That is SIN. We all like to buy gifts for our friends and family. Satan knows this and tempts us with items of the flesh.

        We have faced numerous attempts from the lingerie chain, Victoria's Secret, to open a store in Freehold. So far, I have been able to turn back each attempt. Yet, women in Freehold quietly buy from Victoria's Secret in other cities and their ZIP codes tell the company it should locate here. No, stop buying this enticing merchandise that causes sin and pleases Satan.

        Shop Bras & Bralettes in Every Style - PINK
        Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
          I can see no justification for the US taxpayer being expected to support . .
          Huh? Taxpayer support?

          . . mixed-fabric, nylon-lace tat. If hand-tailored pure silk undergarments are good enough f
          There's one or two Italian quite heavy silk fabrics available in this respect. London suppliers tend to use the Italian silk or maybe French double weave attempts at decorum [FAIL] but mostly

          Comment

          Working...
          X