X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

    Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
    You also have no excuse, in the age of Google ignorance is a choice.



    You don't need to recall, you need to google.

    ...Except when you vote, because then suddenly "my vote doesn't matter" and "it's in God's hands", right?
    I'll admit I didn't know that. Another reason why I'm Presbyterian and not Lutheran.

    Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
    I dunno, let's go see what the h*ll I was talking about:


    Ok, that's what the h*ll I was talking about.
    All I see is alarmism. No solid proof. No definite facts.

    Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
    Prove that's not just a cheap cop-out by giving me your credit card number. Don't worry, it's in God's hands, oh ye of little faith.

    ...Because the last time I heard the "God's Hands" excuse it was by a drunk driver. And before that if was someone who let his kid hand out with drug dealers. Do you agree with them that their irresponsibility is OK because it's in God's hands? If not, why are you suddenly saying that we get to be completely and utterly irresponsible when it comes to nuclear war?
    So you're saying you don't trust God?

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

      All I see is alarmism. No solid proof. No definite facts.
      Solid proof is needed to make you believe that Trump and Clinton don't have the same temperament, professionalism, and mental stability? What sort of proof do you need?

      If you think I'm being alarmist about Hillary Clinton, all I can say is: what source of information did you use to learn about her?

      So you're saying you don't trust God?
      I drive sober and don't let my kids near drug dealers. What would you call that?

      As for you, you still haven't trusted God enough to tell us your credit card number.
      Last edited by Jeb Stuart Thurmond; 10-12-2016, 01:00 PM.
      Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
      Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
      Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

        .
        Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
        Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
        Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

          I didn't put that last video there just for a cheap laugh, I'm seriously thinking democrats watched that and used to to claim they saw the real debate. Look how delusional they getting:
          Put yourself in Hillary’s shoes for a moment. You’re 68 years old. You have spent decades—decades—in the public eye, absorbing criticism from every possible angle. Your opponent is an impulsive, amoral ignoramus with a long history of humiliating women. He has made it his strategy during this debate to dredge up what are probably the darkest moments of your personal life—your husband’s affairs and alleged sexual assaults—as evidence of your failures as a wife and as a woman. He has brought three of these women to sit in the front row during the debate in an attempt to throw you off guard and cow you into submission. He literally tells you to your face that he will imprison you if he wins the election.

          What would you do? If I were Hillary, I would blubber incomprehensibly through my rage-tears for the duration of the debate, if I lasted onstage that long. What did Hillary do? She stood tall and looked comfortable. She listened carefully to the voters who were asking her questions and offered them empathetic, intelligent, and articulate answers.
          ...
          she deserves credit for showing up and getting the job done while a psychopath invaded her personal space, lied repeatedly, attempted to degrade her in the basest and vilest terms, and threatened to jail her...Not all of us have the guts and, yes, stamina to endure and overcome what Hillary is enduring and overcoming in this election. But that’s the point: Hillary has displayed superhuman strength in the face of disgusting, unfair, and false attacks on her character and judgment. If that’s not inspiring, I don’t know what is.
          It's like such a total reversal of the truth, I'm thinking, Hillary for prison, her voters for insane asylums.
          Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
          Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
          Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

            TRUMP BUMP!
            Attached Files
            sigpic

            Tweet me Here
            My GODLY Bio Here

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

              Donald showing his mad rhetorical skillz: "No, you're the puppet". Poor Hillary left dumbfounded. Sad!

              Comment

              Working...
              X