[Didymus Much]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Donald showing his mad rhetorical skillz: "No, you're the puppet". Poor Hillary left dumbfounded. Sad!

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

TRUMP BUMP!

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

I didn't put that last video there just for a cheap laugh, I'm seriously thinking democrats watched that and used to to claim they saw the real debate. Look how delusional they getting:

Put yourself in Hillary’s shoes for a moment. You’re 68 years old. You have spent decades—decades—in the public eye, absorbing criticism from every possible angle. Your opponent is an impulsive, amoral ignoramus with a long history of humiliating women. He has made it his strategy during this debate to dredge up what are probably the darkest moments of your personal life—your husband’s affairs and alleged sexual assaults—as evidence of your failures as a wife and as a woman. He has brought three of these women to sit in the front row during the debate in an attempt to throw you off guard and cow you into submission. He literally tells you to your face that he will imprison you if he wins the election.

What would you do? If I were Hillary, I would blubber incomprehensibly through my rage-tears for the duration of the debate, if I lasted onstage that long. What did Hillary do? She stood tall and looked comfortable. She listened carefully to the voters who were asking her questions and offered them empathetic, intelligent, and articulate answers.
...
she deserves credit for showing up and getting the job done while a psychopath invaded her personal space, lied repeatedly, attempted to degrade her in the basest and vilest terms, and threatened to jail her...Not all of us have the guts and, yes, stamina to endure and overcome what Hillary is enduring and overcoming in this election. But that’s the point: Hillary has displayed superhuman strength in the face of disgusting, unfair, and false attacks on her character and judgment. If that’s not inspiring, I don’t know what is.

It's like such a total reversal of the truth, I'm thinking, Hillary for prison, her voters for insane asylums.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

All I see is alarmism. No solid proof. No definite facts.

Solid proof is needed to make you believe that Trump and Clinton don't have the same temperament, professionalism, and mental stability? What sort of proof do you need?

If you think I'm being alarmist about Hillary Clinton, all I can say is: what source of information did you use to learn about her?

So you're saying you don't trust God?

I drive sober and don't let my kids near drug dealers. What would you call that?

As for you, you still haven't trusted God enough to tell us your credit card number.

[Princess L]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

You also have no excuse, in the age of Google ignorance is a choice.



You don't need to recall, you need to google.

...Except when you vote, because then suddenly "my vote doesn't matter" and "it's in God's hands", right?

I'll admit I didn't know that. Another reason why I'm Presbyterian and not Lutheran.

I dunno, let's go see what the h*ll I was talking about:


Ok, that's what the h*ll I was talking about.

All I see is alarmism. No solid proof. No definite facts.

Prove that's not just a cheap cop-out by giving me your credit card number. Don't worry, it's in God's hands, oh ye of little faith.

...Because the last time I heard the "God's Hands" excuse it was by a drunk driver. And before that if was someone who let his kid hand out with drug dealers. Do you agree with them that their irresponsibility is OK because it's in God's hands? If not, why are you suddenly saying that we get to be completely and utterly irresponsible when it comes to nuclear war?

So you're saying you don't trust God?

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

I have no clue

You also have no excuse:

Luther denounced the Jewish people and urged for their harsh persecution and destruction. In a paragraph from his On the Jews and Their Lies he deplores Christendom's failure to expel them.[1] Moreover, he proposed "What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews":[1]

• "First, to set fire to their synagogues or schools … This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians …"
• "Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed."
• "Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing, and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them."
• "Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb …"
• "Fifth, I advise that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside …"
• "Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them …"
• "Seventh, I recommend putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow … But if we are afraid that they might harm us or our wives, children, servants, cattle, etc., … then let us emulate the common sense of other nations such as France, Spain, Bohemia, etc., … then eject them forever from the country …"

Luther's followers sacked Berlin in 1572 and the following year the Jews were banned from the entire country.[28][which?] Throughout the 1580s riots saw the expulsion of Jews from several German Lutheran states.[9]
...

Vincenz Fettmilch, a Calvinist, reprinted On the Jews and Their Lies in 1612 to stir up hatred against the Jews of Frankfurt. Two years later, riots in Frankfurt saw the deaths of 3,000 Jews and the expulsion of the rest.
...

The prevailing view[31] among historians is that Luther's anti-Jewish rhetoric contributed significantly to the development of antisemitism in Germany,[32]and in the 1930s and 1940s provided an ideal foundation for the Nazi Party's attacks on Jews.

I don't recall Martin Luther being a mass murderer.

You don't need to recall, you need to google.

Yes. Of course results matter.

...Except when you vote, because then suddenly "my vote doesn't matter" and "it's in God's hands", right?

What the hell are you even talking about? That if Hillary was elected we'd have nuclear war?

I dunno, let's go see what the h*ll I was talking about:

Hillary does not have the temperament to control nuclear weapons - she's a loose cannon, unpredictable, easily provoked, constantly sending mixed messages to other nuclear powers, causing all sorts of instability worldwide - just as a candidate mind you, she hasn't even taken office yet.

If President Trump faces a nuclear crisis, he will listen to the best experts, follow the established best practices, and use his proven professionalism and self-control to get things back to normal. Can you say that with 100% certainty about ALL the candidates?

Ok, that's what the h*ll I was talking about.

Oh ye of little faith. Regardless of who gets elected, God is still in control; as people who claim to be Christians, you should know that.

Prove that's not just a cheap cop-out by giving me your credit card number. Don't worry, it's in God's hands, oh ye of little faith.

...Because the last time I heard the "God's Hands" excuse it was by a drunk driver. And before that if was someone who let his kid hand out with drug dealers. Do you agree with them that their irresponsibility is OK because it's in God's hands? If not, why are you suddenly saying that we get to be completely and utterly irresponsible when it comes to nuclear war?

[Princess L]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Don't give me "just saying". Do you or do you not deny the antisemitic massacres in question?

I have no clue what massacres you're talking about. I don't recall Martin Luther being a mass murderer.

You brought up the subject. Now tell me: do results matter?

Yes. Of course results matter.

I'm glad you agree that women become loudmouths when they think they can talk like men. We're making progress here. But why are you treating the two electable candidates as equivalents when you obviously don't believe that they are?

Don't put words in my mouth. I have the highest respect for women, and would never make such a generalization. I was referring to Hillary alone.

I don't understand what you mean. I think they are equivalent in their wickedness, just in different ways.

You know that if we're lucky, a nuclear war would only kill 6,000,000,000 of us. So voting for nuclear war is like voting for the holocaust, and then voting for the holocaust again, and so on until you've voted for the holocaust 1,000 times.
1,000 holocausts is equivalent to WHAT again?





If there's 60 people in this pile, I'll have to copy and paste it 100 million times to show you what a nuclear war would look like. Equivalent to WHAT again?

What the hell are you even talking about? That if Hillary was elected we'd have nuclear war?

Oh ye of little faith. Regardless of who gets elected, God is still in control; as people who claim to be Christians, you should know that.

[Princess L]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Jeb is the one talking about nuclear winters, you'll have to discuss this with him.

How'd you go from me telling you about when I'll make a formal apology to you to nuclear winters? What the hell are you even talking about?

I don't claim to the world authority on electoral systems, but I think your "it doesn't matter" thesis does not give you the right to declare I know nothing about whether election winners actually, you know, win.

As I stated already, that isn't my thesis.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Let me put it this way: we are going to vote if we want Pizza or Chinese food. You're allergic to MSG and/or cats, so you can't have Chinese. Also the Pizza delivery guy is a rapist who will rape you. 2 of us voted for Chinese, 3 of us voted for the rapist. If you vote for Ken Bone, the Pizzaria will have some interesting locker room talk for a while.

Your vote is....


*Drumroll*

KBone of course. I looooove me some Bone. He's such a fine example of a true American!

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

That is clearly Michele Obama attacking a harmless white man. To think Hillary is criticizing Donald for a little young man's fun when the First Lady commits violent acts like this is hypocritical.

It's worse than mere hypocrisy, it confirms a clear pattern where she has reveled in the joy of abusing power with impunity. She knows it's wrong, but she believes power means impunity and she loves that.

Remember that in 2020 when she runs for president. When someone has proven time and time again that they love to abuse power with impunity, are you 100% certain they can be trusted to rule a nuclear-armed power?

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Now tell me: do results matter?

I'm going to guess that she actually does believe that results matter, after all, if conscience were everything, simply staying at home on election day and thinking nice thoughts about Paul Ryan would be enough. God would know how she feels, her conscience would know, and there would be no need to keep result-based voters waiting in line at the polling booth.

Did you know who Hitler's political rival was? A lesser of two evils, that's who. Paul von Hindenburg was a disaster, and the blimp named after him wasn't much good either. I'm sure in the ruins of 1945 lots of people were saying "Well, I wasn't going to vote for the lesser of two evils, and my conscience is clean thanks to my write-in vote for Mickey Mouse..." I'm not sure they got a lot of sympathy then, and I'm not sure the same excuse will work after a slaughter 1,000 as bad.

There's a difference between "typical politician who I disagree with" and "one insult away from having to organize a closed-casket funeral for 6,000,000,000."

[Trent Harvey, Jr.]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

And you'll get it when Hell freezes over

Jeb is the one talking about nuclear winters, you'll have to discuss this with him.

I don't claim to the world authority on electoral systems, but I think your "it doesn't matter" thesis does not give you the right to declare I know nothing about whether election winners actually, you know, win.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

I simply used quotation marks to denote that I was quoting you.

Don't give me "just saying". Do you or do you not deny the antisemitic massacres in question?

And somehow you're now getting reformation and election voting mixed up.

You brought up the subject. Now tell me: do results matter?

Trump's the rapist at worst, and a sexual assaulter at the least. Hillary is just a lying liberal loudmouth.

I'm glad you agree that women become loudmouths when they think they can talk like men. We're making progress here. But why are you treating the two electable candidates as equivalents when you obviously don't believe that they are?

You know that if we're lucky, a nuclear war would only kill 6,000,000,000 of us. So voting for nuclear war is like voting for the holocaust, and then voting for the holocaust again, and so on until you've voted for the holocaust 1,000 times.
1,000 holocausts is equivalent to WHAT again?





If there's 60 people in this pile, I'll have to copy and paste it 100 million times to show you what a nuclear war would look like. Equivalent to WHAT again?

[Princess L]

Re: Second 2016 Debate Liveblog

Still waiting for your apology for this.

And you'll get it when Hell freezes over