Roman Polanski innocent: framed by Manson cult satanists!

[Jeb Thurmond]

Please pray for Roman Polanski, the documentary director who was first to introduce the world to satanic witchcraft cults with the 1968 docu-drama Rosemary's Baby.

If it were not for Roman Polanski, the anti-satanic-cult movement would never have been started. Satanic Ritual Abuse would have gone unnoticed, and sources of satanism like Harry Potter and Dungeons and Dragons would be corrupting Christian children with impunity.

Satanic Cults have tried to silence Roman Polanski before - the Charles Manson Family even tried to assasinate him, but only succeeded in murdering his wife, Sharon Tate, and their unborn child.

The Manson Family and his allies in the International Satanist Movement have struck again, framing Roman Polanski for the "statutory rape" of a 13-year old girl. This is a lie. ROMAN POLANSKI IS INNOCENT.

The incident began when Roman Polanski met Samantha Gailey. When he heard her name, pronounced "Samantha, Gay-ly" he would have concluded that she was a lesbian recruit, who needed to be recruited back to heterosexuality.

Samantha Gaily, 13. In the 70's only lesbians wore jeans.

Of course, to recruit her into hetrosexuality, he would have to lay with her. Yes, this is technically against secular law, however, THERE IS NO AGE OF CONSENT IN BIBLICAL LAW.

This is the Biblical Law that applies to Roman Polanski:

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (King James Version)

28If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

The just punishment for Roman Polanski is for him to pay Samantha Gailey's father, and then to marry her, with no option of divorce.

In fact, Roman Polanski has reportedly already paid half a million dollars in an out-of-court settlement. I'm not certain of the exact numbers for inflation and exchange rates, but that has to be worth more than 50 shekels. I for one am happy to see the Free Market at work in the justice system, I'm sure the judgement of the Free Market is better than that of a government-run (socialist) court case.

This leaves one last accusation, that of sodomy. If Roman Polansky purposely sodomized Samantha Gailey, he is guilty of lust and sperm-murder. However, before we jump to judgement, let's remember that a woman's two holes are very close together and easily confused, and this is especially true on a tiny little 13-year old.

And let's not forget the sole witness in this entire case: that of a drunken, drugged-up 13-year old harlot. Yes, harlot, read the Bible for yourself:

Deuteronomy 22:23-24

23If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her;

24Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not

Samantha Gailey did not cry out loud enough for anyone to hear her. This makes her complict in the hymen-vandalism.

I don't believe Samantha should be executed, as she was not married at the time. With no husband, it's a victimless crime. The only victim is her father, and he's already been paid more than 50 shekels.

Dear Friends, we already know that Satanic Cults are in day-care centers, the recording industry, and the government. We know this because of the risk Roman Polanski took when he produced the docu-drama Rosemary's baby. It has been proven that Satanic Cults, led by Charles Manson, have tried to silence Roman Polanski by any means necessary.

STOP THE SATANIST AGENDA! FREE ROMAN POLANSKI!

[Bobby-Joe]

When I read of the reports of Polanski sodomizing this girl I judged it an open and shut case of homosexuality. While you report that Gailey was lesbian your point that Polanski was just trying to heroically save Gailey from a life time of rug munching has opened my eyes. I think I have rushed to judgment here.

I also agree that the interference of the government's clumsy socialist justice systems is quite unwanted in this matter.

[WWJDnow]

I blame that whore's parents. If they had any decency, they would have sold her into concubinage with Polanski, thus saving all of the embarrasment that resulted from her harlotry.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Leave it to the Democrats to persecute an innocent man. It's always "blame the victim" with those liberals.

[Don Bozo el Guapo]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

Leave it to the Democrats to persecute an innocent man. It's always "blame the victim" with those liberals.

Verdad muy Verdad mi amigo, maybe some of you generation Xer slackers dont remember those 13 yr. old drunkin quailude infused pink nippled harlots but believe me THEY WERTE ALL OVER THE PLACE !!! Judge not lest you be jugged.

[WWJDnow]

I have to admit I'm a little uncertain about this thread. There's no question about it, Polanski was lured into this by the little harlot, so he should be freed immediately, but what kind of name is Roman, anyway? Is he some kind of closet Catholic?

[Nobar King]

I don't understand why the justice dept can't just leave Polanski alone. He paid that little slut 500,000$. Isn't that enough to settle a case of consensual sexual relations?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Nobar King

I don't understand why the justice dept can't just leave Polanski alone. He paid that little slut 500,000$. Isn't that enough to settle a case of consensual sexual relations?

I'd say, Biblically speaking, that 500 big is more than enough shekels.

[Robert Hutchins]

As we all know, Polanski is being prosecuted for this "crime." This little harlot isn't having her life, reputation, and freedom interrupted, and as we all know, it's almost always the girls' fault. Also, I believe it was consentual, and she was "underage." She was 13! Plenty old enough to marry Polanski.

[satan's False Word]

Originally Posted by Robert Hutchins

As we all know, Polanski is being prosecuted for this "crime." This little harlot isn't having her life, reputation, and freedom interrupted, and as we all know, it's almost always the girls' fault. Also, I believe it was consentual, and she was "underage." She was 13! Plenty old enough to marry Polanski.

I agree that the girl may not be as innocent as is the general consensus, but Roman is a perverted pig and as the adult should accept the consequences he is now faced with. 13 is not adult, and therefore he is wrong, not the child.