I agree with you Brother! Your um seed needs to be planted in your wife if you had one God wants lots of little soldiers for his army, if your a catlic your just wasting those special "seeds"
You must not understand the meaning of 'common sense.' The most common of sense I can think of is that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior... and thats straight from the Bible. Keep trying to spread your lies harlot. God's men will not stagger. Maybe you should learn to judge ideas correctly, such as, by their accordance with the Holy Bible.
Brother Bob, it is rare to find a gentleman who arrives here with such love for Jesus. I pray that you will stay with us for a long time!
Well, that scripture from the New Testament certainly contradicts Prune's claim that divorce is not forbidden anywhere in the OLD Testament, doesn't it? I've got a question for you: where in either Testament does it forbid the clergy to marry? Check out 1 Timothy 3, you disgusting pervert.
I agree with you Brother! Your um seed needs to be planted in your wife if you had one God wants lots of little soldiers for his army, if your a catlic your just wasting those special "seeds"
Re: DEUTERONOMY 22:28 If a woman is raped, she MUST marry her rap
I have this question ( you unsaved scum stay out of this!) As all you Godly men and woman know I was rapped when I was younger which I know was God punishing me because I was a sinner anyways I married my high school sweetheart, the rapist was my cousin my marriage so what would God say about this? Your response is every so important!
No, I judge a good idea as one that employs the use of common sense. Something which, of course, your bible seemingly forbids.
You must not understand the meaning of 'common sense.' The most common of sense I can think of is that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior... and thats straight from the Bible. Keep trying to spread your lies harlot. God's men will not stagger. Maybe you should learn to judge ideas correctly, such as, by their accordance with the Holy Bible.
And if you talked to some victims sometime, you'd find that many of them were not wearing skimpy clothes when attacked. In fact, many of them would have been simply out walking the dog or getting out of a train. Or are innocent children who live too close to pedophiles!
And it doesn't matter if a woman's wearing skimpy clothes. NO man has any right to force himself onto a woman who doesn't consent. It is a CRIME.
And remember, men can get raped too, by other men and even (though much less common) women. Anyone who forces themselves upon anyone else, whether man, woman, or animal, is a criminal. End of story.
That's not relevant to this argument, however the foetus is inside the woman's body. Woman's body, woman's choice.
It does matter if the women are wearing skimpy clothes. Thats because we all know that women are satans tools, and a cute girl in a revealing outfit will make a boys blood boil. How many good Christian males have had there lives destroyed by one of Satan's temptresses.
And of course you would bring up the innocent children and the pedophiles.
But in this age of 10 year olds looking like a 18 year old, how do we know that the children are so innocent. I have seen many a young girl run around town in the skimpyist of bikini's. The one's that show there just budding breasts, the long,smooth skin of there long legs that goes all the way up to there cute, round little bottoms. How can you denigh that some of these girls, even if they are young, are not just wanting someone to show them the ways of adult love. Some now have even started little groups in middle schools. They get points on how many older boys and men they can get into trouble for giving into the lust that these "little" girls create. Then one day there in trouble. Thats when they learn Jesus's words " reap what you sow. But our feminazi controlled world, she is always the "victim"
I can be proud to say this has never happened to any of our church's little girls. As the youth pastor there, I tend to teach them right from the start.
I support abortion in the first trimester, which is ample time for the woman to make the choice for herself. During that time it is less a baby than a bunch of cells. From the second trimester onwards, well, I don't think that's a good idea.
But the first trimester is plenty of time for a woman to decide if she wants to have the baby or not.
So then you are 2/3 pro-life and 1/3 baby murderer. Is that a tenable position?
Jesus wants us to protect 100% of human life, not just 2/3 of it.
Praise God, but it does seem that VanHellbound is scooting closer to Christ's love every day. I guess 2/3 is better than nothing.
I support abortion in the first trimester, which is ample time for the woman to make the choice for herself. During that time it is less a baby than a bunch of cells. From the second trimester onwards, well, I don't think that's a good idea.
But the first trimester is plenty of time for a woman to decide if she wants to have the baby or not.
So basically, your earlier argument was nothing but an excuse, and not a real argument.
And I can SEE that you support baby-murder, but can you try to give me a reason based in any notion of sense why? No, of course not...
Though, you are welcome to try so go ahead, post whatever "argument" you may have so the light of Jesus Christ may dissect them all.
PS.
According to what do you judge it a good or a bad idea?
Your own ideas?
So you support abortion even in the ninth month then?
Or is this your latest argument simply an illogical excuse of an argument?
So what is it:
Are you either completely amoral and without respect for human life?
Or are you simply unable to make a coherent and intelligent argument?
In any case, it sounds like it'd be best if you don't make any decisions whatsover..
I support abortion in the first trimester, which is ample time for the woman to make the choice for herself. During that time it is less a baby than a bunch of cells. From the second trimester onwards, well, I don't think that's a good idea.
But the first trimester is plenty of time for a woman to decide if she wants to have the baby or not.
That's not relevant to this argument, however the foetus is inside the woman's body. Woman's body, woman's choice.
So you support abortion even in the ninth month then?
Or is this your latest argument simply an illogical excuse of an argument?
So what is it:
Are you either completely amoral and without respect for human life?
Or are you simply unable to make a coherent and intelligent argument?
In any case, it sounds like it'd be best if you don't make any decisions whatsover..
And if you talked to some victims sometime, you'd find that many of them were not wearing skimpy clothes when attacked. In fact, many of them would have been simply out walking the dog or getting out of a train. Or are innocent children who live too close to pedophiles!
And it doesn't matter if a woman's wearing skimpy clothes. NO man has any right to force himself onto a woman who doesn't consent. It is a CRIME.
And remember, men can get raped too, by other men and even (though much less common) women. Anyone who forces themselves upon anyone else, whether man, woman, or animal, is a criminal. End of story.
That's not relevant to this argument, however the foetus is inside the woman's body. Woman's body, woman's choice.
Okay, the woman has a right to do what she wants with her body...But that right stops when it affects another person's (in that case, the fetus')
And? One in every three women wear skimpy clothes. More in Muslim countries. JESUS wins again.
And if you talked to some victims sometime, you'd find that many of them were not wearing skimpy clothes when attacked. In fact, many of them would have been simply out walking the dog or getting out of a train. Or are innocent children who live too close to pedophiles!
And it doesn't matter if a woman's wearing skimpy clothes. NO man has any right to force himself onto a woman who doesn't consent. It is a CRIME.
And remember, men can get raped too, by other men and even (though much less common) women. Anyone who forces themselves upon anyone else, whether man, woman, or animal, is a criminal. End of story.
And I ask again: were you aborted as a foetus? If not, what give you the right to say that other babies should be murdered? Eh?
That's not relevant to this argument, however the foetus is inside the woman's body. Woman's body, woman's choice.
Leave a comment: