[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

What proof of this truth is there? Technically bacteria and cells don't exist as they are not written about in the bible, yet you look under a microscope and they are there, and before you say this liberal cultivated lies I have seen these things myself so has virtually everyone.

Bicycles did not exist in The Holy Land at the time of Our Lord but we cannot deny them.

Bacteria are over-rated and they may just be bits of dirt floating about (OK, bits of dirt with patterns on them but, bits of dirt all the same.)

Did not Our Dear Lord dismiss any potential effects, in the following passage:
M't:15:20: These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

Whatever they are, or if they are, is of no consequence to the Faith of a Believer and True Christian. So rather than derail a thread, could you just let this one drop? Thank you.

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

We accept that not everything written 2000 years ago is true. Plenty of secular nonsense was written back then, and certainly not all of it is true. The Bible, on the other hand, is true.

What proof of this truth is there? Technically bacteria and cells don't exist as they are not written about in the bible, yet you look under a microscope and they are there, and before you say this liberal cultivated lies I have seen these things myself so has virtually everyone.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

You class the others as cults because they're able to accept that not everything written 2000 years ago is true?

We accept that not everything written 2000 years ago is true. Plenty of secular nonsense was written back then, and certainly not all of it is true. The Bible, on the other hand, is true.

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

So nearly all other "Christian" cults are in apostasy on this point. What else is new?

You class the others as cults because they're able to accept that not everything written 2000 years ago is true?

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

...nearly all other christian sects accept evolution (also there's only 200 odd 'true christians')

So nearly all other "Christian" cults are in apostasy on this point. What else is new?

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

God's Word is timeless, absolutely timeless. Praise! Imagine, as you are being stoned to death, would you consider rocks as birds merely because they fly? God is clear on insects and made millions of them. If He had said they were birds, they would have been.

Hmmm... let me see, do I believe some idiot unsaved trash,... or do I believe God... Hard one eh?

Cretin!

What's cretinous about scientific fact, nearly all other christian sects accept evolution (also there's only 200 odd 'true christians') and I can't accept gods words as timeless when you take the technological advancements that have happened between then and now into account

[TC Patriot]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

Bats are so birds. They fly. God says they are birds. What other proof do you need.

Science is a tool of Satan!

Science Science Science

Read the Bible

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

How?, you're entire lives are based on 2000 year out of date book,

God's Word is timeless, absolutely timeless. Praise!

also if you go by the fact that bats are birds soley because they fly,

Imagine, as you are being stoned to death, would you consider rocks as birds merely because they fly?

surely many insects are also classed as birds, you have no argument...

God is clear on insects and made millions of them. If He had said they were birds, they would have been.

in fact bats are more closely related to primates than birds or rodents. google it if you don't believe me

Hmmm... let me see, do I believe some idiot unsaved trash,... or do I believe God... Hard one eh?

Cretin!

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

in fact bats are more closely related to primates than birds or rodents. google it if you don't believe me

How dare you mention bats as primates >.<, That implies you believe in the lies of evolution, bats are biirds and so are insects and planes for that matter, they havewings so they must be.

[imanothertool]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

in fact bats are more closely related to primates than birds or rodents. google it if you don't believe me

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

How?, you're entire lives are based on 2000 year out of date book, also if you go by the fact that bats are birds soley because they flt, surely many insects are also classed as birds, you have no argument...

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

That's not entirely true, not all bats can fly there are a couple of species in new zealand and its' outlying islands that have lost the ability to fly yet, stil have the leathery wing membranes commonly known as mouse bats as they spend their time on the ground.

Bats are not birds, they have teeth, they do't have beaks or feathers, and also another fact not many people know is birds do not have penises whereas male bats do, .

If you can find walking bats, I can find birds with tallywhackers

another fact is bats have live young, birds lay eggs

Consider the platypus

and bats urinate which birds do not do their urea is realised with the faeces in the solid form of ureic acid

This is vile potty talk and an obsession with animal rude bits.

I realize you see all this as a debating point, to be addressed with logic and applied secular science – herein lies you fault, which is grievous. The Bible says bats are birds, God dictated the Bible, God made everything, therefore God knows what’s what. Case closed.

You can squeal all you want, but God trumps taxonomy.

[Turdhead (On Moderation)]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

Different birds have different characteristics. Penguins can't fly, so it seems to me that bats have more in common with most other birds than do penguins. So, unless you're prepared to acknowledge that penguins are not birds, you have to accept that bats ARE birds.

That's not entirely true, not all bats can fly there are a couple of species in new zealand and its' outlying islands that have lost the ability to fly yet, stil have the leathery wing membranes commonly known as mouse bats as they spend their time on the ground.

Bats are not birds, they have teeth, they do't have beaks or feathers, and also another fact not many people know is birds do not have penises whereas male bats do, another fact is bats have live young birds lay eggs and bats urinate which birds do not do their urea is realised with the faeces in the solid form of ureic acid.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

I guess not having feathers and reproducing like mammals instead of making eggs isn't enough for you

Different birds have different characteristics. Penguins can't fly, so it seems to me that bats have more in common with most other birds than do penguins. So, unless you're prepared to acknowledge that penguins are not birds, you have to accept that bats ARE birds.

[Fandago]

Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

I guess not having feathers and reproducing like mammals instead of making eggs isn't enough for you

Sure, they may be creepy birds that don't taste real good, but they're still birds.

So, you have eaten bats eh?