X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dr. Zaius
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Check out these amazing bat pictures:
    Stunning shots of thirsty bats swooping down for a drink from garden pond

    Swooping low over a garden pond in Surrey, these are the stunning pictures of bats enjoying an evening drink at their favourite watering hole. They are so detailed you can even see the night creatures slurping from the pool with their little pink tongues.

    The amazing shots were taken after months of painstaking planning by wildlife photographer Kim Taylor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turdhead
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Yup alright I made an error at least I can admit it, technically the second part of what I said is celluar biology but it's all linked rather closely and it's all herecy so what does it matter?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Isaac Peters
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    Microbiology is dealing with all microscopic life and it's function, sorry I'm not dependant on scripture, just don't see the point when I already know what something means.
    Yet again, not even your fellow Christ-denying, pointy-headed intellectuals will back you up. Since you lot are so enamored of Wickedpedophile.org, I'll quote that site's definition for you (and may Jesus forgive me for doing so, even to rebuke a sinner):

    Microbiology (from Wickedpedophile, the Jesus-free encyclopedia):

    Microbiology (from Greek μῑκρος, mīkros, "small"; βίος, bios, "life"; and -λογία, -logia) is the study of microorganisms, which are unicellular or cell-cluster microscopic organisms.
    That's quite different from your definition, isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    Microbiology is dealing with all microscopic life and it's function, sorry I'm not dependant on scripture
    Apparently you are not dependent on the dictionary either.

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    just don't see the point when I already know what something means.
    If you knew what "microbiology" meant, you wouldn't have claimed that "microbiological means all things living that can't be seen without a microscope including components of macroscopic organisms such as cells and organelles." (emphasis mine)

    You were doing pretty well up until you got to the bolded part.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    Consider the platypus
    Well said.
    Consider the platypus, who was once handsome and as tall as you.
    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    What proof of this truth is there? Technically bacteria and cells don't exist as they are not written about in the bible, yet you look under a microscope and they are there, and before you say this liberal cultivated lies I have seen these things myself so has virtually everyone.
    If they're so real, why can't you see them without using special machines?
    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    It's not a theory, it's proven microrganisms exist, and explain things such as medicines work without there being anything to act on.
    I'm pretty sure we have a thread somewhere about how micro-organisms are a gateway sin.
    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    Microbiology is dealing with all microscopic life and it's function.
    Yes. Macro-organisms are not microscopic. If they were, they'd be micro-organisms.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turdhead
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Microbiology is dealing with all microscopic life and it's function, sorry I'm not dependant on scripture, just don't see the point when I already know what something means.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    Macroscopic: All objects that can be with the human eye without the need for magnification.
    That's great, but we were concerned about your redefining of "microbiology".

    Outside of your home-brewed dictionary, microbiology is about the study of microorganisms only, and does not include the microscopic parts of macroscopic organisms.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Turdhead
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Pastor Billy-Reuben View Post
    It sounds like you are writing your own home-grown dictionary. I think I'll stick with Websters.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben
    Macroscopic: All objects that can be with the human eye without the need for magnification.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    Nope, microbiological means all things living that can't be seen without a microscope including components of macroscopic organisms such as cells and organelles.
    It sounds like you are writing your own home-grown dictionary. I think I'll stick with Websters.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Turdhead
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Nope, microbiological means all things living that can't be seen without a microscope including components of macroscopic organisms such as cells and organelles.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Isaac Peters
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    I said microbiological, that doesn't just mean 'germs' ....
    Then you admit that you're backpedaling.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turdmion View Post
    ...we now know the cause of virtually all illness to be microbiological in some way or another...
    Hey friend, if you can back that ridiculous statement up with proof, then you can make a little money.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turmion View Post
    [secular scientific hypotheses deleted] killing anyway so why oppose the destruction of abominations in the eyes of the lord before they can be fully fledged satanists, they'll go to hell either way.
    It is not for us to bring others to the Judgment of The Lord, that is His Job (and He does it well.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Turdhead
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Pastor Isaac Peters View Post
    We do? Which germ causes Tay-Sachs disease? How about prostate cancer?
    I said microbiological, that doesn't just mean 'germs' cancer is caused by number of factors usually due to bad diet or exposure to chemical or hereditary back ground, this leads to mutations in the dna of cells and causes growths which lead to tumours which are what a cancer is. Tay-Sachs disease is a genetic disease and caused by gene mutation during meiosis or fertilisation which results in certain genes being coded and therefore expressed wrong, I've no doubt you'll say it's god that causes these mutations and therefore the children are satanists, which that if a foetus is screened and found to have the condidtion then aborted surely this is a good thing as it is ridding the world of satanist and you lot sure like killing anyway so why oppose the destruction of abominations in the eyes of the lord before they can be fully fledged satanists, they'll go to hell either way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Isaac Peters
    replied
    Re: BATS AREN'T BIRDS!

    Originally posted by Turmion View Post
    ...we now know the cause of virtually all illness to be microbiological in some way or another....
    We do? Which germ causes Tay-Sachs disease? How about prostate cancer?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X