[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

So by your logic, no-one lies, ever?

Because you show no sign of being able to tell your head from a hole in the ground, that's why!

No, I didn't say that nobody lies, I say that it would be kind of stupid to erase the truth and replace it by a lie.

My motherlanguage is Dutch. I have a proposal: try to answer on a DUTCH forum, in DUTCH whole the time, wont work either he.. So don't judge me on my spelling (that would be kind of lame), judge me on my opinion, no problem with that..

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

I'm not talking about google itself, i'm talking about the THINGS YOU CAN FIND on google: images, text, etc.. And don't come up with an excuse lik: "You can photoshop this!" or "you can modify that!" People wont modify something true into something untrue.

So by your logic, no-one lies, ever?

Why couldn't I correct a mistake if i see one, there's no problem with it..

Because you show no sign of being able to tell your head from a hole in the ground, that's why!

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Google is a search engine, not a knowledge database. Go Google "alien abductions" or "the moon landing was a hoax" and see what you get. It's definitely not a source of "indisbutable (sic)" evidence. And anyone can edit Wikipedia. There's a reason it's not widely viewed as anything more than a start to research.

PS: I don't think anyone who wrote "Did you saw what god did? Did you saw The Creation?" should be commenting on someone else's mistakes.

I'm not talking about google itself, i'm talking about the THINGS YOU CAN FIND on google: images, text, etc.. And don't come up with an excuse lik: "You can photoshop this!" or "you can modify that!" People wont modify something true into something untrue.. And if you don't want to search with google, go to your (former) biologyteacher and ask him, he will have some nice stuff to prove what I'm telling you here..

Why couldn't I correct a mistake if i see one, there's no problem with it..

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Do you want evidence? Google, wikipedia, etc.. perfect places to find indisbutable evidence and references. If you want to denie the truth of evolution, your problem..

PS: isn't it "someone WHO is typing.." instead of "someone what is typing". I'm not an object, you see?..

Google is a search engine, not a knowledge database. Go Google "alien abductions" or "the moon landing was a hoax" and see what you get. It's definitely not a source of "indisbutable (sic)" evidence. And anyone can edit Wikipedia. There's a reason it's not widely viewed as anything more than a start to research.

PS: I don't think anyone who wrote "Did you saw what god did? Did you saw The Creation?" should be commenting on someone else's mistakes.

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

What I see is either someone that is typing way too fast, or someone that can't spell. I'll tell you what. You write a dissertation, with supporting evidence, and references. I'll read it, and comment.

What you've written above is, "Neener neener. I know more than you because I read something once." That's not the proper way to argue.

P.S. Thanks for changing your font.

Do you want evidence? Google, wikipedia, etc.. perfect places to find indisbutable evidence and references. If you want to denie the truth of evolution, your problem..

For example: you want to have a kid, so: you search a wife and you reproduce yourself. Normal, not? When you reproduce yourself, you give DNA from yourself to your child, your "descendant". The DNA, which is in the one and only cell you dropped, will split, and split, and split, till you have a grown descendant. In your DNA, there are hereditarily DNA-cords, which your possible descendents get when you want to reproduce your kind. If those DNA-cords are strong and if they will be usefull in a next lifeform, they will be cept and past trough to the next descendant. Only strong "capabilities" will be cept, because the weak ones wont survive. THAT is what I call evolution: your descendants will become stronger and stronger by every generation. And no I will speak forward in time: WE are not complete, we stil can change, and we are changing! In the middleages, people only were 30, maximum 40, years old. Now, the average human lifetime is 70-80 years, and you say that there isn't something like evolution?

Ow yeah, I think it's better that you come up with some proof, I already did.. Prove me that The Creation is a fact, that it really happened. Prove it..
Then I could think about my meaning over again and MAYBE reform my opinion.. (but I'm not convinced that you will come with evidence, because there is no.. )

I didn't read it once, I'm studying that kind of stuff for almost three year.
I didn't say I know more than you, I'm saying that I'm more realistic than you..

BDW: no problem..
PS: isn't it "someone WHO is typing.." instead of "someone what is typing". I'm not an object, you see?..

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

But it IS definitive, the facts speak for themself...
Everything I mentioned has been proven and something that is proven is definitive, because you can't change it..
Can you proof that God created the world? Can you? NO you can't..
Can scienentist proof that evolutionism was and stil is the whole idee behind "life"? Can they? YES they can.. They have enough evidence: fossiles, DNA, other genetics, chemicals, etc..
What do you guys have? A Holy Bible.. oooooooh, nice..
Did you saw what god did? Did you saw The Creation? (i'd like an answer on that..)

And are you one of those tree people?
I didn't spoke to god, I don't know how to, I did once and he didn't answer..
All this desipience gives ME a headache..

What I see is either someone that is typing way too fast, or someone that can't spell. I'll tell you what. You write a dissertation, with supporting evidence, and references. I'll read it, and comment.

What you've written above is, "Neener neener. I know more than you because I read something once." That's not the proper way to argue.

P.S. Thanks for changing your font.

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Once I desipher the rest, I'll adress your argument, if I remember.

You say proven as if that's definitive. For every theory, there are at least three that say something different. After you've spoken with god on the subject, please feel free to come on back and discuss it.

For the sake of our eyesight though, could you please drop the italics(or whatever fancy script you're using)? It gave me a headache trying to read it.

But it IS definitive, the facts speak for themself...
Everything I mentioned has been proven and something that is proven is definitive, because you can't change it..
Can you proof that God created the world? Can you? NO you can't..
Can scienentist proof that evolutionism was and stil is the whole idee behind "life"? Can they? YES they can.. They have enough evidence: fossiles, DNA, other genetics, chemicals, etc..
What do you guys have? A Holy Bible.. oooooooh, nice..
Did you saw what god did? Did you saw The Creation? (i'd like an answer on that..)

And are you one of those tree people?
I didn't spoke to god, I don't know how to, I did once and he didn't answer..
All this desipience gives ME a headache..

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Well, this is the whole idee behind the evolution:

Once I desipher the rest, I'll adress your argument, if I remember.

You say proven as if that's definitive. For every theory, there are at least three that say something different. After you've spoken with god on the subject, please feel free to come on back and discuss it.

For the sake of our eyesight though, could you please drop the italics(or whatever fancy script you're using)? It gave me a headache trying to read it.

[Appelfap.]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Why would anyone believe someone who can't even spell?

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Well, this is the whole idee behind the evolution:

• All organisms want to reproduce themselves, that's what their after.
• Some of the descendants are different from each other.
• Some of the descendants have larger chances of survival.
• Some of this descendants get more descendants because the have larger chances of survival (it all makes sense..)
• Some qualities, which cause a larger chance of survival, are hereditary.
• Trough the time, here on earth, other kinds are arised.
• The history of the life on earth (how all kinds are arised) is proven by fossils...

And that is what MY biologyteacher says, that's what ALL biologyteacher say (I don't know what yours says..), that is what ALL scientist say and that is what is proven by fossils (like I mentioned..)

So you guys want to denie something that's proven conclusively and believe that 1 guy, ONE GUY, created everything on 6 days, knowing that te evolution itself took 4.75 billion years (it started right after the big bang..) to complete..

Well, you may believe that, but I believe the truth. And the truth is proven...
Do you have any indisputable proof of The Creation by God? Something that is worth believing, something to which you can't say "No!" and not something you guys believe that is dictated by God himself (I never heard him speaking..)... I have never seen something, which has been discribed in the Ho ly Bible, being proved by someone. So my conclusion: I will only believe that what you guys say, if there is hard proof. And if there's not: start convincing me..

Start being realistic..

[mister A.H. (On Moderation)]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Oh, so we should believe like you do; that humans are just nothing more than highly specialized sponges. That is what you Darwinists believe right? All animals are descendants of sponges. I'll take talking snakes over being a sponge fine thank you.

You're putting it very literly, but yes, that's basically what's happened, but it didn't happened in 6 days, no, it happened in 4.75 bllion years.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

yes every major religion has had a flood story, and there were massive floods were those religions were....but not the entire earth....so you believe in noahs ark...he got 2 of every 50 million some odd specie on ONE boat then when it was all over he distributed them throughout the earth in their corresponding geological areas?? like all the marsupials in australia? wow your right...how couldnt i believe such an obvious truth!!!

Two words friend; “undocumented miracle” That is how all those creatures survived The Flood. God covered them with bubbles of protection like He covers the United States of America. Except maybe the penguins. Christians scientists suspect the Devil created penguins to mock God.

yes i can say with 100% certainty there was no adam and eve...theoretically there was a genetic adam. a male that we all share the same Y chromosome with. thats genetic science....DNA....i know you will say scientists lie but wouldnt it make their job easier to say we found the answer...god did it. then all you people would be happy. but no they want TRUTH so they take the evidence and put it together...try it some day

Oh, so we should believe like you do; that humans are just nothing more than highly specialized sponges. That is what you Darwinists believe right? All animals are descendants of sponges. I'll take talking snakes over being a sponge fine thank you.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

that is STEPHEN HAWKINGS your thinking about and he is the smartest man in the world. the video i gave you which you obviously didnt look at is Richard Dawkins...big difference.

So you agree that you believe that hawkings is the "smartest man in the world?" Or has he lost the title?
(You seculars keep changing your minds all the time as to what's fact and not.)
You did say the "smartest man in the world" had made those videos.. So can you try making some sense?
I thought that was what I said: that if he (the so called "smartest man in the world") was so smart he would fear God?

Besides, if this dawkins is an atheist then he is as stupid and evil as hawkings.
You're right, I didn't look at your videos.

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

and "DR" davidson...im not going to put footnotes and refrences on the website...that is for my professor....but thanks for the hint there Tips.

Well, if I were you, I'd put them there. That would add some weight to your arguments. I would also add a copyright notice. Instead of persecuting Christians, you should be watching your own a**.

[15.3IQ (On Moderation)]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

wow salvationseeker you are the dumbest one here....that is STEPHEN HAWKINGS your thinking about and he is the smartest man in the world. the video i gave you which you obviously didnt look at is Richard Dawkins...big difference.

and "DR" davidson...im not going to put footnotes and refrences on the website...that is for my professor....but thanks for the hint there Tips.

"adam" was a male in a tribe that was stronger and smarter then the other males and in turn got all the women....aswell as the other men having SOME of the women....well his kids mix with their kids and there are more of his then theirs....its simple mathematics.....

lol and i love how simply you come to the conclusion "god did it" when i ask you about noahs ark....how simple!