[Brother John]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

So that seems like a satisfactory account of how to get from non-life to life to you? How peculiar.

I never said it didn't sound hard to grasp, if not false.

Doesn't make up for their inability to master any machinery more complex than the sporks at KFC.

Never said that either

So you admit that science is bunkum?

Out of a non-ethical perspective, yes. In accord with natural selection we should throw our deformed off cliffs. But then again, the Bible instills us with values and morals, doesn't it?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

No, because it takes long to do so.. Scientist gave their lives to discover that, they passed it trought to their sons and doughters..
So you admit you have no actual proof for your ideas and you're just repeating superstitions passed down from generation to generation?

I'm glad I don't have a father in haven, which I would never see..
What about the Holy Ghost? Do you deny the Holy Ghost, too?

I'm Belgian.. old
But you admitted yourself you were quoting Dutch Catholic lies! You despicable Belgians can't even come up with your own falsehoods, you have to steal them from your nether neighbours!

Keep on going like that, I like your Christian compassion .. old
You are lucky that we are filled with the infinite lovingkindness of God, that's all I have to say.
Doesn't the bible say that god gave us brains to evolve further and further and to use those brains in your life? Well, we did and we found out that science is the one and only way to explain why we're here.. That Jew who wrote the bible of course didn't expect that science would overrun religion.
No. The Bible doesn't say that. And God is NOT a Jew! That would make Him suicidal!
Evolution, my friend, evolution.. old
No. Even according to evilution, organisms have to evolve from other organisms. Where did the first organism come from?

'nother racistical remark, I think THAT more deserves infraction points..
Thank you for your input. Seeing as you're a moderator on these boards, I'll certainly take your opinion into consideration. Oh, what's that you're saying, Sooty? G-Baby isn't a moderator on these boards? He's a backwards Belgican who denies Christ and seeks to barge into other people's forums and tell them how to run them? Really? Well, he can go to hell in that case. Or Belgium, I'm assured they're very similar.
No you can't.. 'cause science is something about life itself and the bible is HOW to live a life..

You silly little boy. The Bible is about God. Life is about God, so since the Bible is about God, it clearly stands to reason that the Bible is about Life, the Universe and Everything. And vice versa!

First of all: evolution and the creation of organisms are unrelated. Whether a bacteria was created by God and allowed to evolve, everything was created by God individually, or we're a product of chance and time, both things are not related.
Now, on the matter of things springing out of rocks: that is indeed preposterous. The Urey-Miller experiment, however, proved that the basic molecules that we consist of can easily be made out of CO2, CH4, N2 and H2 plus heat and lightning, all of which were present in the early stages of Earth (3.5 billion years ago). It provides an indication that we are the product of those gases mentioned earlier. The reason that it doesn't happen now is that the conditions aren't met nowadays.

So that seems like a satisfactory account of how to get from non-life to life to you? How peculiar.
[quote=ApollyonThey are physically superior though... Jesse Owens in his day blew away Aryan theories, or at least those based on physical strength.
[/quote]
Doesn't make up for their inability to master any machinery more complex than the sporks at KFC.

Oh, and one more things: we humans don't evolve anymore. Because healthcare and medicine have developed so strongly the last couple centuries and decades, we are artificially keeping our genetically weaker individuals alive. By scientific law, I shouldn't be typing this here.

So you admit that science is bunkum?

[Brother John]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Oh, and one more things: we humans don't evolve anymore. Because healthcare and medicine have developed so strongly the last couple centuries and decades, we are artificially keeping our genetically weaker individuals alive. By scientific law, I shouldn't be typing this here.

[Brother John]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Prove this one... I have studies religions over half my life, and I remember no mention of a great meteor. In Viking mythos, the fire giant Sutur will defeat Frey and his fire will devour the nine worlds. This is after Skoll devours the sun of course. It's called the Ragnarok.

You really need to research facts before you open your mouth, or in this case, before you try to type.

It's only part of Ragnarok and not everything burns up, as a certain patch (Idavoll) in Asgard survives, as well as part of the world tree Yggdrasil and various non-described worlds. (Yes, I just finished reading the Edda ^^)
Anyhow, point is that people mightn't have been able explain what they saw then, but they knew it happened. A great flood, an eclipse, meteors, they were all things that were out of order. Most possibly a reason to include them in their writings as doomsday scenarios.

Well, rocks are where you evilutionists claim that life came from. But I restate my question: Ever seen a soup turn into a dog? A dog turn into a monkey? A monkey into a man?

First of all: evolution and the creation of organisms are unrelated. Whether a bacteria was created by God and allowed to evolve, everything was created by God individually, or we're a product of chance and time, both things are not related.
Now, on the matter of things springing out of rocks: that is indeed preposterous. The Urey-Miller experiment, however, proved that the basic molecules that we consist of can easily be made out of CO2, CH4, N2 and H2 plus heat and lightning, all of which were present in the early stages of Earth (3.5 billion years ago). It provides an indication that we are the product of those gases mentioned earlier. The reason that it doesn't happen now is that the conditions aren't met nowadays.

But, as been shown before, carbon dating only goes back to 60,000 years. So where do the numbers for 3.5 billion, 65 million, 10 million come from, when they can't place anything older than what they claim is 60,000 years?

Geological dating does not rely upon carbon dating. Carbon dating is used for the dating back of organic material (anything that is or was alive), and thus contains carbon. The dating of Earth and other planets relies on the analysis of magnetic fiels, the concentrations of iron, nickel, and trace elements as cobalt, ... (to a lesser degree). What can be used is the presence of carbon (as a whole, not only the radioactive isotopes) in higher concentrations as an indication for life, by analysing the immediate surroundings one could then guess when those organisms lived.

Exactly! If evilution were true, the inferior primates would have died out by now. There is no way Darwinism can explain the continuing existence of inferior primates such as this one:

They are physically superior though... Jesse Owens in his day blew away Aryan theories, or at least those based on physical strength.

Sorry for the unstructured reply, I scrolled down a couple times and copied some stuff on which my gaze fell.

[Enobarbus]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Found another contradiction:..




Make up your mind, buddy, I'm not going to listen to someone who argues with hisself..

And you stop being a pedantic fool or you risk being deleted. The word wrote is used in the first example in the sense of authored -- this is obvious. In the second example Pastor Ezekiel is also stating the obvious -- that God didn't literally inscribe the words on the parchment.

Are you going to tell us that it is incorrect to say that J K Rowling wrote the Harry Potter books because she actually dictated them into a tape recorder and had them typed-up later by a secretary?

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Found another contradiction:..

God wrote the KJV1611 Bible

No of course it wasn't written by God. It was DICTATED by God.

Make up your mind, buddy, I'm not going to listen to someone who argues with hisself..

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Booby means a woman's breast. The only possible thing "booby hatch" could mean is you are sitting on a woman's chest. That is just plane retarded.
Well, let's see, I looked it up in an english dictionary and found "Booby Hatch" Extend your vocabulary, my friend..

They spoke Aramaic and Greek in the 1st Century Palestine in Jesus time. The Romans spoke Latin but then again Jesus and His disciples were hardly Roman. For all your carping about how we TRUE Christians need to read a book maybe you should follow your own advice, loser.
How do you explain that a large part of later (not much later of course..)
were in Latin?

Well, rocks are where you evilutionists claim that life came from. But I restate my question: Ever seen a soup turn into a dog? A dog turn into a monkey? A monkey into a man?
No, because it takes long to do so.. Scientist gave their lives to discover that, they passed it trought to their sons and doughters..

And I think that your father must have done something terrible for God to have cursed him like this.
I'm glad I don't have a father in haven, which I would never see..

No, that proves that Dutch Catholics are a bunch of lying scumdogs.
I'm Belgian..

You do know that I have the power to ban you from this site, right? It is only my Christian compassion that stops me doing just that.
Keep on going like that, I like your Christian compassion ..

You are clearly a retard. God works in mysterious ways, and it is not our place to try to understand them. Doesn't the bible say that god gave us brains to evolve further and further and to use those brains in your life? Well, we did and we found out that science is the one and only way to explain why we're here.. That Jew who wrote the bible of course didn't expect that science would overrun religion.

When we do, we end up producing incomprensible jibber-jabber like that piece of writing. So where do you think life comes from, if not God?
Evolution, my friend, evolution..

Speak English or die, you accursed foreigner!
'nother racistical remark, I think THAT more deserves infraction points..

I'll try and prove God to you with the jawbone of an ass in a minute if you don't stop flapping your unholy yap! Can you prove science with the Bible?No you can't.. 'cause science is something about life itself and the bible is HOW to live a life..

Exactly! If evilution were true, the inferior primates would have died out by now. There is no way Darwinism can explain the continuing existence of inferior primates such as this one:

Euhm.. Natural selection..

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

why not the viking tales of the killer meteor?

Prove this one... I have studies religions over half my life, and I remember no mention of a great meteor. In Viking mythos, the fire giant Sutur will defeat Frey and his fire will devour the nine worlds. This is after Skoll devours the sun of course. It's called the Ragnarok.

You really need to research facts before you open your mouth, or in this case, before you try to type.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

you and billybob with the racist avatar have got to be the dumbest people on this site...actually Brother V is the only one on here who doesnt sound like a lunatic...but you with the name Temperance, you would think you would have some temperance....

dogs came from wolves....man came from a breed of primate....you want to see the one we came from? you cant because it changed to us...if it changed to us WHY would there still be some?

Exactly! If evilution were true, the inferior primates would have died out by now. There is no way Darwinism can explain the continuing existence of inferior primates such as this one:

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

or a volcano or any catastrophic event...why jump to the conclusion of noahs flood...why not the viking tales of the killer meteor? what makes your stories any more valid then any other religions??

Becuase friend God wrote them down in The Bible. If it was a viking killer meteor then God would have said something about Him smiting the Sweds with one of His rocks.

[15.3IQ]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

Well, rocks are where you evilutionists claim that life came from. But I restate my question: Ever seen a soup turn into a dog? A dog turn into a monkey? A monkey into a man?


And I think that your father must have done something terrible for God to have cursed him like this.

No, that proves that Dutch Catholics are a bunch of lying scumdogs.

Possibly in your dreams.

You do know that I have the power to ban you from this site, right? It is only my Christian compassion that stops me doing just that.


You are clearly a retard. God works in mysterious ways, and it is not our place to try to understand them. When we do, we end up producing incomprensible jibber-jabber like that piece of writing. So where do you think life comes from, if not God?

Speak English or die, you accursed foreigner!

No, I can handle the Holy Bible just fine, thank you very much. If I came into your drug den and started shouting about Christ, you wouldn't tolerate it for long, so why should we have to put up with your heresies in our Church forum?

I'll try and prove God to you with the jawbone of an ass in a minute if you don't stop flapping your unholy yap! Can you prove science with the Bible?

you and billybob with the racist avatar have got to be the dumbest people on this site...actually Brother V is the only one on here who doesnt sound like a lunatic...but you with the name Temperance, you would think you would have some temperance....

dogs came from wolves....man came from a breed of primate....you want to see the one we came from? you cant because it changed to us...if it changed to us WHY would there still be some? stop being a ****in idiot and looking in a book of lies for truth.....its so simple...you cant say the bible is true because god says it is IN THE BIBLE...if god spoke to us all and said "yea i wrote that" then you could believe it

but i have book that says unicorns exist...because they wrote it....see how that doesnt make sense....i have a book that leprechauns wrote...and i know that because it says so....do you see how stupid that is!??!??!

[15.3IQ]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

But, as been shown before, carbon dating only goes back to 60,000 years. So where do the numbers for 3.5 billion, 65 million, 10 million come from, when they can't place anything older than what they claim is 60,000 years?

It comes from the geological record, right?

But what if all of this was lies?

Saying it takes millions of years to make a fossil, what if there was an event that changed the world.

Read this article.

Secular news source

How did a bunch of eggs (more than 100) all become fossils at once? How were there also dinosaur prints that were captured at the same time? If we put together these 2 things, we see a SUDDEN, VIOLENT change in something (the earth).

This one moment in time, of a dinosaur laying eggs and walking away was captured forever (until ScIeNtists uncovered it). What does it show to you? 2 separate events, or one?

What could have caused all these eggs to have suddenly stopped working? What could have caused the prints to be suddenly captured?

The answer is simple.

Noah's Flood.

YIC
V

or a volcano or any catastrophic event...why jump to the conclusion of noahs flood...why not the viking tales of the killer meteor? what makes your stories any more valid then any other religions??

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

No, because a rock isn't a living organism.. (baha, you have to come with a better argument.. old )

Well, rocks are where you evilutionists claim that life came from. But I restate my question: Ever seen a soup turn into a dog? A dog turn into a monkey? A monkey into a man?

I think you're more cursed than I will be in my entire life..

And I think that your father must have done something terrible for God to have cursed him like this.

Jep, it was.. old
I quote a dutch catholic site:
"After that Kanaän was back in hands of the Jews, it was devided under twelve 'tribes'. Around 772 B.C. the land of the Jews was invaded by the Assyrians.
The Assyrians were relieved by the Babylonians. Babylonia was so strong that it captured Juda (israël) without any resistance. Nebukadnesar II (an example for Saddam Hoessein anyway) let Jeruzalem burn to the ground and carry off the inhabitants to Babylonia.
!!! In THAT Babylonian Captivity, the first Biblical books arised. The Jews tried to endure their history by writing those old stories down.!!!

So, that proves that it's not more than a fancy fairy tale which teaches you something about old stories. And later they were modified to teach you how to live a good life.

No, that proves that Dutch Catholics are a bunch of lying scumdogs.

I think I just gave one above..
Did I saw something of you, by the way?

Possibly in your dreams.

Try to stop me..

You do know that I have the power to ban you from this site, right? It is only my Christian compassion that stops me doing just that.

U mama is Genesis 1!
So, I would start MY research in YOUR paperworks? Act normal, I'm trying to give you a prouf that that's not how it happened.
Anyway: How did god actually made light? Did he switched a button or something? (How did he made the stars, the sun, the moon?old )
How did he made water? Did he turned on faucet?

Saying that all those suddenly appeared when he wanted to is kind'a ridiculous.. Whe, evolutionists have a realistic "theorie" (I'm just quoting you, guys.. old ): Many rocks accumulated (by the affinity) --> The pressure became to hard --> BANG! --> all those rocks were spread again, back into the universe and were developping themselves into planets (with every planet, with his own chemical constructions)
THAT's how the sun and the planets developped.
The stars: the stars are small pieces of rock, but really small pieces, which send light because they all heve fotons which swap from shell to shell (in an atom of course.. old :p) The superfluous energy is send outside the very little rock and travelles to the earth (the place where you see that star) with the speed of light.

You are clearly a retard. God works in mysterious ways, and it is not our place to try to understand them. When we do, we end up producing incomprensible jibber-jabber like that piece of writing. So where do you think life comes from, if not God?

Boeie..

Speak English or die, you accursed foreigner!

Because you can't handle the true truth? Yeah right

No, I can handle the Holy Bible just fine, thank you very much. If I came into your drug den and started shouting about Christ, you wouldn't tolerate it for long, so why should we have to put up with your heresies in our Church forum?

How can I explane SCIENCE without SCIENCE kind'a riciculous (yeah yeah, now you're going to say "How can I explane GOD without the BIBLE? " Yeej, maybe I'm kind of a god too.. ) The point is: try to prove God with science: prove it with DNA, prove it with Skull etc..
THEN I'm prepared to believe you..

I'll try and prove God to you with the jawbone of an ass in a minute if you don't stop flapping your unholy yap! Can you prove science with the Bible?

[Brother V]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

n whichever way life developed, we have fossil traces of it that have been reliably dated at 3.5 billion years old. And there are suggestions from carbon deposit analyses (looking at percentages of the kinds of isotopes that we know are produced by life) that hint at an even earlier animation. The fossil remains, of bacteria, look similar to a modern variety, the Cyanobacteria, which are actually thought of as the most advanced.We are looking at some two to three hundred million years for the appearance of a form of life on Earth.
Evolutionary/Geological Timeline
Studies of early Earth environments and the evolution of microbial life

But, as been shown before, carbon dating only goes back to 60,000 years. So where do the numbers for 3.5 billion, 65 million, 10 million come from, when they can't place anything older than what they claim is 60,000 years?

It comes from the geological record, right?

But what if all of this was lies?

Saying it takes millions of years to make a fossil, what if there was an event that changed the world.

Read this article.

Secular news source

How did a bunch of eggs (more than 100) all become fossils at once? How were there also dinosaur prints that were captured at the same time? If we put together these 2 things, we see a SUDDEN, VIOLENT change in something (the earth).

This one moment in time, of a dinosaur laying eggs and walking away was captured forever (until ScIeNtists uncovered it). What does it show to you? 2 separate events, or one?

What could have caused all these eggs to have suddenly stopped working? What could have caused the prints to be suddenly captured?

The answer is simple.

Noah's Flood.

YIC
V

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions for Evolutionist to answer

n whichever way life developed, we have fossil traces of it that have been reliably dated at 3.5 billion years old. And there are suggestions from carbon deposit analyses (looking at percentages of the kinds of isotopes that we know are produced by life) that hint at an even earlier animation. The fossil remains, of bacteria, look similar to a modern variety, the Cyanobacteria, which are actually thought of as the most advanced.We are looking at some two to three hundred million years for the appearance of a form of life on Earth.
Evolutionary/Geological Timeline
Studies of early Earth environments and the evolution of microbial life

Have you ever considered friend that God may have just permited Satan to plant all this evidence to missled you? I mean that is a lot easier to accept than we are all just pond scum that got lucky. With your thinking calling someone a "scumbag" is not an insult.